similar to: [PDB] Error "DIA is not installed on the system" occured in `llvm::pdb::loadDataForExe()`.

Thanks Krzysztof. That's very helpful - I was missing the distinction between a register containing an undefined value and a register marked as containing an undefined value. Cheers! On 1/23/18, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Send llvm-dev mailing list submissions to > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,

I was just trying to build lldb-6.0 from source (and had previously successfully build llvm-6.0, clang-6.0, and lld-6.0 from source), but received a compile error while using both just cmake and cmake+ninja Does this look familiar to anyone? In file included from llvm/lldb-6.0.0.src/source/API/SystemInitializerFull.cpp:89: In file included from

+ Jonas who hit the same bug recently. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Eric Gorr via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I was just trying to build lldb-6.0 from source (and had previously > successfully build llvm-6.0, clang-6.0, and lld-6.0 from source), but > received a compile error while using both just cmake and cmake+ninja > > Does this look familiar to

I'm still trying to figure this out. On one of my machines it went away after a clean install even though my configuration is exactly the same. I'll let you know once I know more. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:28 PM Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> wrote: > + Jonas who hit the same bug recently. > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Eric Gorr via llvm-dev >

Sounds like we have an issue in the CodeView headers related to a duplicate symbol. While this doesn't entirely surprise me after seeing the error, I'm also not sure why this problem is only just happening now. Ultimately what's happening is we have this enumeration: enum class RegisterId : uint16_t { ... CR3, ... }; But your termios.h file also has a #define for CR3. I guess one

Op 1/3/2018 om 8:31 AM schreef Daniel Kenzelmann: > 3. Januar 2018 00:49, "Stephan Bosch" <stephan at rename-it.nl> schrieb: > >> Op 1/2/2018 om 10:48 PM schreef Daniel Kenzelmann: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm not entirely sure whether this issue is with exim or with dovecot. >>> >>> First some background: >>>

Hi Rithik, CodeMoverUtils is not aimed for only loop transformations, it can be used by any transformation which want to move code or check if code is safe to be moved. It can currently do both hoist and sink but require control flow equivalent between the original location and the intended to be moved location. I would like to keep the API decoupled from loop, so other transformation can use it.

Op 1/3/2018 om 10:58 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: > Op 1/3/2018 om 8:31 AM schreef Daniel Kenzelmann: >> 3. Januar 2018 00:49, "Stephan Bosch" <stephan at rename-it.nl> schrieb: >> >>> Op 1/2/2018 om 10:48 PM schreef Daniel Kenzelmann: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm not entirely sure whether this issue is with exim

Np, good luck! :) - Stefanos Στις Τρί, 24 Μαρ 2020 στις 8:55 μ.μ., ο/η RITHIK SHARMA < rithiksh02 at gmail.com> έγραψε: > Many thanks, Stefanos! I really appreciate your help :) I heard from > Whitney. > > Best, > Rithik > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 23:08, Stefanos Baziotis < > stefanos.baziotis at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Rithik, >> >> I

Greetings, As of LLVM 5.0.1, LLVM generates a dependency on diaguids.lib if it finds DIA SDK available. This is ok, however llvm-config.exe does not expose the path to the library, so it results in these link errors: LLVMDebugInfoPDB.lib(DIASession.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "long __cdecl NoRegCoCreate(wchar_t const *,struct _GUID const &,struct _GUID const

Hi, I'm not entirely sure whether this issue is with exim or with dovecot. First some background: I'm using exim with dovecot-auth which in turn is using LDAP for authentication. When using AUTH PLAIN with the optional initial response argument, everything is fine. However when using AUTH PLAIN without the optional response argument, instead of getting an empty challenge ("334

Hi, While dogfooding our lldb based IDE on Linux, I am seeing a lot of variable evaluation errors related to DW_TAG_member which prevents us from release the IDE. Can anyone help to confirm if they are known issues? If not, any information you need to troubleshoot this issue? Here is one example: (lldb) fr v *error: biggrep_master_server_async 0x10b9a91a: DW_TAG_member '_M_pod_data'

If you're going to use clang built binaries with lldb, you'll want to pass -fstandalone-debug - this is the default on platforms where lldb is the primary debugger (Darwin and freebsd) Not sure if that is the problem you are seeing, but will be a problem sooner or later On Mar 26, 2016 4:16 PM, "Jeffrey Tan via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, >

Thanks David. I meant to send to lldb maillist, but glad to hear response here. Our binary is built from gcc: String dump of section '.comment': [ 1] GCC: (GNU) 4.9.x-google 20150123 (prerelease) Is there any similar flags we should use? By doing "strings -a [binary] | grep -i gcc", I found the following flags being used: GNU C++ 4.9.x-google 20150123 (prerelease)

Hi, I've just tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc3. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. This will be the last release candidate unless there is a major problem. I'm planning to tag the final release on Dec 19. -Tom

Hello again, 9.0.0-rc4 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371490. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc4 Binaries will be added as they become available. There are not a lot of changes from rc3 to rc4, and there are again no open release blockers, so I'm hoping this will be the last

Hi, I've just tagged the 9.0.1-final release. Testers can begin uploading binaries. -Tom

Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc5 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371837. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc5 Binaries will be added as they become available. There is only a single change from rc4 to rc5. Once more, the hope is that this will be the last release candidate and that we can

Hello, for reasons I want to know the return value of TYPEOF(R_NilValue), I expect it to be NILSXP, but I can't find this documented anywhere. Ideally, I'd like to see the source definition of R_NilValue, but after fair bit of searching I cannot find an obviously location for this. Would someone please point me in the right direction? thanks -- CRICOS provider code 00123M

Hi, I've tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc2. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. If all goes well, this will be the last -rc. -Tom