similar to: LLVM EH tables much larger than GCC's

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "LLVM EH tables much larger than GCC's"

2018 Jan 10
0
LLVM EH tables much larger than GCC's
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Ryan Prichard via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > 2. *Termination landing pads.* > > Clang sometimes uses a landing pad that calls __clang_call_terminate to > terminate the program. GCC instead leaves a gap in the call site table, > and the personality routine calls std::terminate. For the 4MB > libQt5Core.so sample I'm
2018 Jan 11
1
LLVM EH tables much larger than GCC's
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:21 AM, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Ryan Prichard via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> 2. *Termination landing pads.* >> >> Clang sometimes uses a landing pad that calls __clang_call_terminate to >> terminate the program. GCC instead leaves a gap in
2017 Mar 21
4
Resurrect Bug18710 (Only generate .ARM.exidx and ARM.extab when needed with EHABI)
Hello Everyone, This is my first attempt to getting used with the submission process. Trying to get the "good practice" with the coding standard, tools, mailing lists... and already a few questions: - Is it possible to "link" 2 related entries in Phabricator ? one for LLVM and one for CFE ? what's the best way of posting 2 related or dependent patches ? - I'd
2014 May 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Code generation for noexcept functions
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Stephan Tolksdorf <st at quanttec.com> wrote: > Hi, > > When clang/LLVM can't prove that a noexcept function only contains > non-throwing code, it seems to insert an explicit exception handler that > calls std::terminate. Why doesn't clang leave it to the eh personality > function to call std::terminate when an exception is thrown
2017 Aug 21
20
[Bug 102349] New: nv4x crashing with plasmashell - gdb log included
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102349 Bug ID: 102349 Summary: nv4x crashing with plasmashell - gdb log included Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau
2003 Dec 09
2
: global and local variables
Hi all I have a problem pertaining to local and global variables. Say I have a function defined as follows: a<-function(x) {y<x^2} i.e a(2) [1] 4 function b is now defined to take the value of y and do some manipulation with it. As it stands I dont know how to store the variable y such that other functions are able to reference its value. I know that I
2016 Oct 04
28
[Bug 98039] New: KMail crash on starting (nouveau-related)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98039 Bug ID: 98039 Summary: KMail crash on starting (nouveau-related) Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee:
2011 Feb 17
1
Integrate with an indicator function
Hi all, I have some some problem with regard to finding the integral of a function containing an indicator function. please see the code below: func1 <- function(x, mu){ (mu^2)*dnorm(x, mean = mu, sd = 1)*dgamma(x, shape=2)} m1star <- function(x){ integrate(func1, lower = 0, upper = Inf,x)$val} T <- function(x){ 0.3*dnorm(x)/(0.3*dnorm(x)+0.7*m1star(x))} func2 <-
2010 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question
2010/1/22 James Williams <junk at giantblob.com> > > > 2010/1/22 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > > Hi James, >> >> >> I've been trying to get a minimal test function to work, which simply >>> invokes _Unwind_RaiseException with a single clean-up landing pad. However. >>> when I run it my personality function is not getting
2010 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question
2010/1/22 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi James, > > > I've been trying to get a minimal test function to work, which simply >> invokes _Unwind_RaiseException with a single clean-up landing pad. However. >> when I run it my personality function is not getting called - >> _Unwind_RaiseException simply returns apparently doing nothing. Looking at
2010 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question
Hi James, > I've been trying to get a minimal test function to work, which simply > invokes _Unwind_RaiseException with a single clean-up landing pad. > However. when I run it my personality function is not getting called - > _Unwind_RaiseException simply returns apparently doing nothing. Looking > at the x86-64 assembly output from llc, I can see this is happening >
2013 Feb 04
2
[LLVMdev] ARM c++ exceptions handling not working with clang/llvm-3.2?
Hello, am I wrong or the ARM c++ exceptions handling does not work? See the difference between assembly generated by clang and gcc with the following test code: #include <stdio.h> #include <exception> # test.cpp int main() { try { throw 20; } catch (int e) { printf("Exception Nr %d occurred\n", e); } return 0; }
2011 Feb 17
1
Integration with an Indicator Function in R
Hi all, I have some some problem with regard to finding the integral of a function containing an indicator function. please see the code below: func1 <- function(x, mu){ (mu^2)*dnorm(x, mean = mu, sd = 1)*dgamma(x, shape=2)} m1star <- function(x){ integrate(func1, lower = 0, upper = Inf,x)$val} T <- function(x){ 0.3*dnorm(x)/(0.3*dnorm(x)+0.7*m1star(x))} func2 <-
2011 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] Exception Tables in latest LLVM
Hi Yiannis, > I have been using llvm 2.8 (i know ancient history!) for a backend that i was > implementing. I have been trying to port my patches to latest llvm (svn build) > lately but i have one problem as far as the Exception Handling mechanism is > concerned. It seems that there are no Exception Tables generated any more such > as the one below: got some example bitcode for
2009 Mar 13
2
[LLVMdev] how to reslove gcc_except_table?
hi: maybe this should not be here! the test code: eh3.cpp int main() { try { throw 34; } catch (int) { } catch (char) { } catch (bool) { } } compile with g++ -S -dA eh3.cpp -o eh3.s the except table of the eh3.s 106 .section .gcc_except_table,"a", at progbits 107 .align 4 108 .LLSDA2: 109
2011 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] Exception Tables in latest LLVM
Hey everybody! I have been using llvm 2.8 (i know ancient history!) for a backend that i was implementing. I have been trying to port my patches to latest llvm (svn build) lately but i have one problem as far as the Exception Handling mechanism is concerned. It seems that there are no Exception Tables generated any more such as the one below: .section .gcc_except_table,"a", at
2012 Sep 27
1
Is there a way to source from a specific Git repository without hardcoding the location everywhere?
Folks, A small group of us are working together to develop a set of R functions to support data management and analysis using Eclipse/StatET in a Windows environment. We are using Git/EGit for version control. We work within our own repository and occasionally push to a common remote location. I'd like to have the code source files from the 'local' git repository without
2020 May 07
2
libQt5Core.so ver 5.12
Hello, For the last few days, 'dnf upgrade' on my Centos 8 installation has been showing problems saying that it cannot install the best update candidates for packages (kf5-*) because nothing provides libQtCore.so.5(Qt_5.12). My system shows that it presently has libQtCore.so.5(Qt_5.11). I've been keeping the system up to date using the --nobest option in dnf. I could download
2011 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] Exception Tables in latest LLVM
On 09/02/2011 05:58 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Yiannis, > >> I have been using llvm 2.8 (i know ancient history!) for a backend that i was >> implementing. I have been trying to port my patches to latest llvm (svn build) >> lately but i have one problem as far as the Exception Handling mechanism is >> concerned. It seems that there are no Exception Tables generated
2011 Aug 05
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite
On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > Bill, > ooops, yes, I described the meaning of "throw(A)" backwards, I thought that might be the case. :) > but I still > think my example shows why you cannot merge LandingpadInst while > inlining because multiple filter-lists on a LandingpadInst don't make sense. > > Perhaps I'm reading your