similar to: Linker Option support for ELF

Hi. We''re testing the most recent ZFS version from OpenSolaris ported to FreeBSD. Kris (CCed) observed strange situation. In function arc_read() he had a panic on assertion that we try to unlock a lock which is not beeing held: rw_enter(&pbuf->b_hdr->b_datalock, RW_READER); err = arc_read_nolock(pio, spa, bp, done, private, priority, flags, arc_flags, zb);

Besides supporting newer version of xfs file system, this patch also does some code refactoring and fix completely broken listing and searching on v2-3 node directories. Cc: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Cc: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> Cc: Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr

Hello, I have been attempting to set up a lme and have looked at numerous posts including 'R's lmer cheat-sheet' as well as reading a number of papers and other resources including R help, but I am still a little confused on how to write my model (I thought I had it). I have asked a number of questions on different forums; most of which have been resolved. My main concern right now

Hello, I hope that you can bare with me. I am new to models, but I think I have a pretty godd understanding of how to run them now, including how to use AICc and Anova. The issue is that I have many factors that I wish to compare so doing each one at a time would take forever. I came across the MuMIn package and I was so excited, however I am getting an error message and i don't know why.

I have recently upgraded my firmware from v6.3 to v7.4. Now when the phone is booted or rebooted, the initial screen "Initializing Vlan" takes forever to initialize before it initializes IP. Any ideas/Thoughts? (Trying not to Revert back to v6.3). -C -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, today I was debugging some code (compiled by a 2 weeks old clang) on a PowerPC embedded system using the newest gdb (v7.4). I got a backtrace like this: (gdb) bt #0 0x0fe96314 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #1 0x1002c8ac in mli_poll ( fds=<error reading variable: Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0x1>, nfds=<optimized out>, timeout=<optimized out>) at

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:24:01PM +0200, Gabor Greif wrote: > Hi all, > > today I was debugging some code (compiled by a 2 weeks old clang) on a > PowerPC embedded system using the newest gdb (v7.4). > > I got a backtrace like this: > > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0fe96314 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #1 0x1002c8ac in mli_poll ( > fds=<error reading

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686 Summary: sshd dies by non-root account session Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p1 Platform: MIPS OS/Version: IRIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: yuki at

Does anyone know if version 3.1 is Call Manager or SIP? Thanks.

Regarding non-IEEE targets: yes, we definitely support those, so we do have to be careful about not breaking them. I know because I have broken them. :) See the discussion and related links here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19391 But having an exactly specified fneg op makes that easier, not harder, as I see it. Unfortunately, if a target doesn't support this op (always toggle the sign bit and

I'll give some data points from our OpenVMS Itanium (and Alpha) platforms where we support multiple IEEE modes and dynamic rounding in our C and Fortran compilers (we don't have actual FENV_ACCESS in our C product but you can come close). On the command line, you get to pick IEEE modes with:   /IEEE_MODE         /IEEE_MODE=option         /IEEE_MODE=DENORM_RESULTS (D)      Selects the

The Wine development release 1.7.20 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - X11 drag & drop fixes. - A few more C/C++ runtime functions. - Fixes for various memory issues found by Valgrind. - Some OLE storage fixes. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations:

I don't see any controversy for the preliminary requirement of removing BinaryOperator::isFNeg() and friends, so start with that? That work may reveal other potential regressions that we can patch in advance too. Other than that, I think there's really only a question of do we want 1 or both of fneg and fneg_constrained (and if we choose both, then I assume we'd also add

> > These numbers sound like a problem I has a while ago with the decoder. > > The VAD shouldn't take much CPU so I suspect there might be floating > > point underflows in some part, slowing down the Intel CPUs a lot (for > > some reason, the AMD CPUs seem to handle underflows faster). > > > > Hmm, How can I find that out? How much CPU would you expect

Hi all, While reviewing a recent clang documentation change, I became aware of an issue with the way that clang is handling FP denormals. There is currently some support for variations in the way denormals are handled, but it isn't consistent across architectures and generally feels kind of half-baked. I'd like to discuss possible solutions to this problem. First, there is a clang

I have no example side effects in hand. But LLVM targets a bunch of architectures, and who knows what the future holds. So it may be prudent to not promise too much so as to leave ourselves an escape hatch. Doesn’t LLVM target some chips that have floating point instruction sets that are not IEEE compliant? Can we be certain that no new LLVM target will ever have to jump through hoops to avoid

I am working on a reproducible computing platform for which I would like to be able to _exactly_ reproduce an R object. However, I am experiencing unexpected randomness in some calculations. I have a hard time finding out exactly how it occurs. The code below illustrates the issue. mylm1 <- lm(dist~speed, data=cars); mylm2 <- lm(dist~speed, data=cars); identical(mylm1, mylm2); #TRUE

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >>Reverberation suppression? >> >> > >Basically, it means that if you are in a room with lots of echo (long >decay), I can reduce it a bit. > > > >>I guess this would help reduce local source echoes? I've never >>_noticed_ that to be a problem in my use, but I would imagine that >>using a notebook's

It’s definitely one that would need some target hooks, and is probably not actually worth doing without analysing the producers and consumers of the value. If the source and destination values need to be in floating point registers, the cost of FPR<->GPR moves is likely to be a lot higher than the cost of the subtract, even if the xor is free. If the results are going to end up in integer