similar to: RFC: Extending DISubrange count field

Regarding flags, I was just thinking that maybe we should invent a new DISubprogramFlags type. DISubprogram already has a few bitfields for subprogram-specific things, Fortran will want 3 more, and there's no reason to fill up the generic DIFlags with more bits that are used in only one class. I agree that the array stuff needs to be designed with an eye to handling how other languages do

*From:* flang-dev <flang-dev-bounces at lists.flang-compiler.org> *On Behalf Of *Eric Schweitz (PGI) *Sent:* Thursday, November 01, 2018 1:02 PM *To:* flang-dev at lists.flang-compiler.org *Subject:* [Flang-dev] RFC: Adding debug information to LLVM to support Fortran In order to support debugging in the Flang project, work has been done to extend LLVM debug information for the Fortran

Dear LLVM, Consider two loops with one interation - First with constant lower bound, second with usual non-constant lower bound: int main(int argc, char ** argv) { int numOfIterations= 1; int stride=1; int lowerBound = 1000; - 1st | int lowerBound = argc; - 2nd int upperBound = lowerBound + (numOfIterations - 1)*stride; int i = lowerBound;

On 27.02.2012, at 17:13, Николай Лихогруд wrote: > Dear LLVM, > > Consider two loops with one interation - > First with constant lower bound, second with usual non-constant lower bound: > > int main(int argc, char ** argv) > { > int numOfIterations= 1; > int stride=1; > int lowerBound = 1000; - 1st | int lowerBound =

On 27.02.2012, at 18:49, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Kramer > <benny.kra at googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> On 27.02.2012, at 17:13, Николай Лихогруд wrote: >> >>> Dear LLVM, >>> >>> Consider two loops with one interation - >>> First with constant lower bound, second with usual

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at googlemail.com> wrote: > > On 27.02.2012, at 17:13, Николай Лихогруд wrote: > >> Dear LLVM, >> >>     Consider two loops with one interation - >>     First with constant lower bound, second with usual non-constant lower bound: >> >>     int main(int argc, char ** argv) >>     {

Hi Kevin, Thanks for your interest and for your deep analysis. Unfortunately, your approach doesn't catch all bugs and is vulnerable to an attack. Consider the following case: ...................... | ----- obj --- | | end ^ ptr ^ ^ end-of-memory The scenario is as follows: - an object is allocated in the last page of the address space - obj is byte

Nuno, Inspired by this email thread, I spent a bit of time today looking through the implementation of BoundsChecking::instrument(..). Based on my reading of prior work, it should be possible to do these checks in two comparisons, or possibly even one if the right assumptions could be made. Could you provide a bit of background of the expected domains of Size and Offset? In particular,

Well, we are getting somewere...;) >It is probably 'greyed' out because no Windows tools use it or will add it. You will probably need to use Unix tools (ldb or ldap) to remove>them, but you can if you so wish ignore them. What you should never do is to rely on them being there, because they may or may not be there.Ok, I'll let it be there> You need to remove the gidNumber

I am investigating changing BoundsChecking to use address-based rather than size- & offset-based tests. To explain, here is a short code sample cribbed from one of the tests: %mem = tail call i8* @calloc(i64 1, i64 %elements) %memobj = bitcast i8* %mem to i64* %ptr = getelementptr inbounds i64* %memobj, i64 %index %4 = load i64* %ptr, align 8 Currently, the IR for bounds checking

>When you provision a new domain, it is set 3000000, but, seemingly, when you run the classicupgrade it gets sets to a lower number (never actually run a classicupgrade) based on what is in your old domain. > Not sure what to suggest here, do you feel up to sending me (offlist) a copy of your idmap.ldb ? > >Rowland Thank you again, Rowland, for your time. I think that different ID

Dear R-users I intend to create a function which calls some smaller other functions in return. Some of these smaller functions all call some functions. I do not know a good way to do this. I tried using the source() function to include the smaller functions within the main functions before they are called. This does not work, or maybe i am not doing the right thing. For example: the

Hi everyone, I have been using adaptIntegrate from the cubature package for a multidimensional integral that has infinite variance (and so not appropriate for Monte Carlo techniques). Most of the time it works but sometimes (though not always) when I slightly increase the accuracy I want, or increase the bounds of integration I get the following error: REAL() can only be applied to a

LLVM Weekly - #210, Jan 8th 2018 ================================ If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/210>. Welcome to the two hundred and tenth issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex

Hi, Getting straight to the point: /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/root/elara/samba/ --use-xattrs=yes --realm=mycompanyname.com.pl/root/elara.smb.conf After cleaning up all duplicate names and sutch I end up with: ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)->search ldb: ldb_trace_response: ENTRY dn: CN=CONFIG cn: CONFIG upperBound: 4000000 lowerBound: None xidNumber: None

The goal is to test a developed model against two sets of hypothetical data, where the relationship between on data set is linear whereas non-linear (e.g., polynomial) with another. However, the distributions of the v1 and v2 should not be other than normal or slightly positively skewed or slightly negatively skewed. In Oracle, random data is generated with packaged function

Rowland, Are (one) these not an option for him to correct this? --allocate-uid Get a new UID out of idmap --allocate-gid Get a new GID out of idmap --set-uid-mapping=UID,SID Create or modify uid to sid mapping in idmap --set-gid-mapping=GID,SID Create or modify gid

> On 09 Apr 2016, at 13:09 , Muhammad Bilal <Muhammad2.Bilal at live.uwe.ac.uk> wrote: > > The goal is to test a developed model against two sets of hypothetical data, where the relationship between on data set is linear whereas non-linear (e.g., polynomial) with another. However, the distributions of the v1 and v2 should not be other than normal or slightly positively skewed or

On 10/09/2016 12:14 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 11:50:42 -0600 > "Paul R. Ganci via samba"<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >On 10/09/2016 02:51 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> > >Have you by any chance got another 3001108 'xidNumber' in >>> > >idmap.ldb ? If you give a user a

I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, except for 300000. Below is an example. root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ total 16 drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 scripts root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/Policies total 16 drwxrws---+ 5 MEDARTS\reachfp