similar to: Repo directory layout

The first layout is older, and the second is newer. Going forward, things are likely to move around. The second layout is more flexible because it doesn't put any repo inside another repo, so I would recommend adopting it. At the very least, using it will put you in a good position to adapt to any future layout changes. On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 1:36 AM Liad Mordekoviz via llvm-dev <

Hey Tim, thanks for the quick answer, this looks exactly like what I was trying to achieve, I was hoping there was something more clean, I was wondering how the community would accept a change in the TD, if the code at CallinvConvLower.cpp:138 would've passed the IsFixed flag to the AssignFn then all those workarounds wouldn't be needed, this example is only one of a few I can think of for

Hey Paul, first of all thank you for taking the time to answer me, if I understand you correctly, I need to modify the instruction it self so one of it's operands is a symbol, and then at MC layer handle that symbol and add an entry to the symtab for that label? What kind of symbol should I use doing such thing? external symbol or MCSymbol? I was trying to find where in the code during the MC

Hi Liad, I'm not an expert in MC, but what you describe doesn't sound any different from how you would handle a branch instruction. Create an MCSymbol that represents the address of the target instruction; use that symbol as an operand in the referencing instruction; emit the symbol as a label just prior to emitting the target instruction. The second and third steps can occur in either

Hey, I am working on a new back-end, in my back end, I require to pass every argument through a register when calling a function, unless the argument is part of the ellipsis (...) and then pass it through the stack, I've tried creating a CCCustom function to analyze the operands when a function has var args, however, the information whether the out val is fixed or not is not passed into the

Hi everyone, I am fairly new to LLVM, I'm working on a new backend. I am trying to add information to a specific instruction using the .symtab in the ELF format. I've been searching through the LLVM source code trying to find a way to do such a thing. Can anyone help me with some directions or point me to some documents in the matter. Thanks, Liad. -------------- next part --------------

Hi everyone, I'm faily new to LLVM, I'm working on a new backend. In my backend, one of the requirements is to split a BB on every call, I considered putting some kind of pseudo instruction using the TargetLowering::LowerCall function. Before going said path, I was wondering if there is some way to split the BB before the SelectionDAG is generated, this way the call instruction would be

How about fitting Android's repo? :D I have not used repo for llvm, but been using my synthesized repository (for my buildbot). https://github.com/chapuni/llvm-project https://github.com/chapuni/llvm-project-submodule ...Takumi

012/6/3 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>: >> Author: chapuni >> Date: Sat Jun  2 10:34:26 2012 >> New Revision: 157890 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=157890&view=rev >> Log: >> Revert r157819, "#ifdef out a broken test on win32" >> >> FYI, LLVM_ON_WIN32 is useless. > > Can you be more specific? I

Good morning. LLVM and clang can be built successfully on Fedora 12 PS3. On RC1, only one test failed. test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll On release_29 branch, all llvm tests can pass. (I don't mention clang tests :p ) ...Takumi Fedora release 12 (Constantine) Linux speedking.localdomain 2.6.32.23-170.fc12.ppc64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 27 17:09:35 UTC 2010 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux llvm

Chen, Teemu is asking "the official git mirror" and he oughta know where the svn repo is. ;) Teemu, I have created an unofficial one; https://github.com/chapuni/dragonegg Excuse me, I might not update it so frequently. Anton, please provide us the official dragonegg.git! ...Takumi

On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:15:09 +0900 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > 012/6/3 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>: > >> Author: chapuni > >> Date: Sat Jun  2 10:34:26 2012 > >> New Revision: 157890 > >> > >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=157890&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Revert r157819,

Yuri, on which host? 2011/8/17 Yuri <yuri at rawbw.com>: > In r134967 it still worked, and in r137742 it now doesn't. > I used such flags: --enable-assertions --enable-shared --enable-libffi > --enable-debug-runtime --enable-debug-symbols --disable-optimized > > Before build would create directory tools/llvm-shlib under the build > tree. Now it is missing. In my

In r134967 it still worked, and in r137742 it now doesn't. I used such flags: --enable-assertions --enable-shared --enable-libffi --enable-debug-runtime --enable-debug-symbols --disable-optimized Before build would create directory tools/llvm-shlib under the build tree. Now it is missing. Yuri

Hi, My New Year's resolution is to complain (constructively) whenever I get a spurious build failure email from a buildbot. For new or infrequent contributors especially, they can be extremely confusing and unnecessarily alarming. This one below is the first build ever attempted by the builder, so how on earth can it have come up with a meaningful blame list? And in any case, surely we

Good morning Jose, Thank you to send patches. - Please send patches to llvm-commits. - Please make patches with "--attach". You may add "format.attach" to git config. I have not seen yours yet, but I pushed yours to github; https://github.com/chapuni/LLVM/compare/ed4edf9e...jfonseca%2F20110316 (Excuse me I could not input accent) ...Takumi On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:15

On Mar 15, 2011, at 7:25 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: > Good morning. > Hi Nakamura, > LLVM and clang can be built successfully on Fedora 12 PS3. > Hooray! :-) > On RC1, only one test failed. > test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll > Eric commented that this should be fixed on the release branch right now. > On release_29 branch, all llvm tests can pass. Woo! :-) >

Hi Chris, llvm.org/perf gives again error 500s. I remember you had a look the last time. Would you mind looking again? Also, is there something which we could do to make LNT more robust. Do you have an idea what the last issue was about? Thanks, Tobias -------- Original Message -------- Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on polly-perf-O3-polly-scev-codegen-isl Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:08:44

Kimura san, You may ask committer of r153706. I wonder if it could be x86-independent. > /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/Release/bin/llc: > error auto-selecting target for module 'No available targets are > compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets.'. >  Please use the -march option to explicitly pick a target. ...Takumi as

Ping, NAKAMURA san, thank you. Bill san, can you comment this commit? r154798 still fails on ppc32-lnux b/c *only* for this test. Loving more minor arch, the world will be better... 2012/04/04 23:26 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>: > Kimura san, > > You may ask committer of r153706. I wonder if it could be x86-independent. > >>