similar to: Parsing a bit code file

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > On 2017-Apr-04, at 12:12, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 3, 2017, at 7:08 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: >>

Hi, I am finding that my project that previously successfully built with versions 3.5 to 4.0 is now failing to link because of missing implementation for dump(). Errors I get are: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "llvm::Type::dump() const", referenced from: ravi::LuaLLVMTypes::dump() in ravi_llvmtypes.cpp.o dump_content(lua_State*) in ravi_llvmluaapi.cpp.o

On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 10:02 -0400, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > > - at 5 = internal global [10 x i8] c"\22\D0\12\F4!\00\15\F9\EC\E1" > - at 6 = internal global [10 x i8] c"\D0\19\FB+\FD\F8#\03\E2\11" > + at 5 = internal global [10 x i8] c"\22Ð\12ô!\00\15ùìá" > + at 6 = internal global [10 x i8] c"Ð\19û+ýø#\03â\11" > > The diff

I need help. I can't get it to work. I'm crying here, really, I'm balling my eyes out. Is there any way for a beginner to get support with using LLVM? All my queries are just ignored or disregarded on this mailing list. Why isn't there an llvm mailing list for novices? This is the only thing that can get my programming language, to be operation in a reasonable amount of time,

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1183 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org --- Comment #1 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2007-05-18 17:53:29 --- This

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1183 Summary: sshd fails to update utmp Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: aaw at rincewind.tv

Hi, I tried creating intrinsics which are to be placeholders for a set of instructions which should not be executed by the backend. I want to retain only intrinsic,phi and terminator instructions in a basic block. I have taken care of the external dependencies of basic block. How do I delete the rest of the instructions? Thank You Aditya P.S:

Hello: I've been tasked with trying to find a way to keep users from ever "permanently" deleting emails. The users are running Thunderbird and are using the "Archive" option for when emails are deleted. However, they are still able to delete emails from the Archive folders... I'm wondering if there's any way that I can configure Dovecot to make sure that

Hi, I tried creating intrinsics which are to be placeholders for a set of instructions which should not be executed by the backend. I want to retain only intrinsic,phi and terminator instructions in a basic block. I have taken care of the external dependencies of basic block. How do I delete the rest of the instructions? Thank You Aditya P.S:

On 07/14/2013 08:05 AM, Star Tan wrote: > I have found that the extremely expensive compile-time overhead comes from the string buffer operation for "INVALID" MACRO in the polly-detect pass. > Attached is a hack patch file that simply remove the string buffer operation. This patch file can significantly reduce compile-time overhead when compiling big source code. For example, for

I think one of the more interesting phenomena in the world of wine that has arisen in the past five years is the emergence of a group known as the American Association of Wine Economists. I must admit, when I first saw the announcement of their existence, I assumed it was just some economists having a good time and looking for an excuse to drink some more wine.http://chloehandbagsspring2011.com