similar to: address aliasing in llvm pass

Hello Everyone, I have written a llvm pass which will instrument load and store of annotated variables. Now I am looking to add address aliasing in my pass. Suppose if there are two variables and only of the them is annotated accessing the same memory then I want to instrument load and store for both variables instead of instrumenting only the annotated one. I am not sure where should I start,

Do you pull clang under llvm/tools and compile it as well? In theory, if `opt` recognize the option, so does `clang -mllvm`. 2018-01-12 8:47 GMT+08:00 sangeeta chowdhary <sangitachowdhary at gmail.com>: > Hello, > > I have tried giving this option like this > > clang -c -emit-llvm -mllvm -rdetector hello.c -c -o hello.bc > but I am getting error " Unknown command

Hello All, I am trying to write llvm pass to instrument function in external library. I am using clang to automatically load my pass. I have test.cpp which calls functions in library testlib.so. I have written llvm pass to instrument all reads and writes in test.cpp and call function(recordRW) in testlib.so. this is how my pass looks like - for (auto &BB : F) { for (auto &I : BB)

Hello, I have followed steps given in - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29910051/integrating-llvm-passes/48142693#48142693 <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29910051/integrating-llvm-passes/48142693#48142693>, to integrate my pass with pass manager and run it with clang. I am able to run my pass with opt - opt -mypass but when I try to run it with clang, I always get an error -

Clang doesn’t support adding passes from the command line the way opt does. Opt has special parsing in opt.cpp for this that clang doesn’t have. I’m not sure what the correct way to do this is. I think your plugin needs to do something to tell clang/llvm when to run the pass. I’ll try to look later when I’m back at a computer. On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:00 PM 陳韋任 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at

Hello All, I am trying to write llvm pass to instrument function in external library. I am using clang to automatically load my pass. I have test.cpp which calls functions in library testlib.so. I have written llvm pass to instrument all reads and writes in test.cpp and call function(recordRW) in testlib.so. this is how my pass looks like - for (auto &BB : F) { for (auto &I : BB)

`-mypass` should be only recognize by the backend part (i.e. llvm). You should add `-mllvm` to tell clang the following argument have to be passed to the backend part. 2018-01-08 8:02 GMT+08:00 sangeeta chowdhary via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hello, > > I have followed steps given in - https://stackoverflow.com/ >

On 14 Jan 2018, at 00:14, sangeeta chowdhary <sangitachowdhary at gmail.com> wrote: > > I have taken SimplePass and added in Transform directory, “libLLVMSimplePass.a” is built but I can not see this pass in opt —help. I don’t even see the name of pass while registering it in the example. The SimplePass example is intended to be built out of tree, so I’ve no idea what happens if you

(though, usual caveat: you /usually/ shouldn't be doing that - instead relying only on whatever semantics the IR actually carries, rather than implying extra semantics based on the demangled name) On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:48 PM Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I have not tried it but maybe > > `std::string llvm::demangle(const

I am sorry to not make my question clear. My question is how this value is calculated without having fadd and fsub in IR? On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Neither 1e16 or 1e16+1 can be accurately represented in a double. The > largest integer than be accurately represented is 2^53. As the number gets > larger floating sacrifices

Hello, I am doing some program analysis with C++ programs. I need to check if some particular function is called in the program, for that I need the name of the function being called in the call instruction. Since C++ mangles the name of the function, I need a way to demangle the function name in llvm IR. Is there any way to achieve that in llvm pass? Regards, Sangeeta -------------- next part

Hi, I have below code in C - int main() { double x,y; x = 1e16; y = (x + 1) - x; printf("y:%e\n", y); return 0; } llvm bitcode looks like this for this function - ; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable define dso_local i32 @main() local_unnamed_addr #0 { entry: %call = tail call i32 (i8*, ...) @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([4 x i8], [4 x i8]* @.str, i64 0, i64

Hello Everyone, I am trying to do what has been done for tsan. So, there is a run time library “tsan" to detect races. There is a llvm pass to instrument read and write in c program and call functions in run time library. I have all three things with me, but I don’t know how should I link all these three together. Basically I want to know how to implement same functionality as given below

I have taken SimplePass and added in Transform directory, “libLLVMSimplePass.a” is built but I can not see this pass in opt —help. I don’t even see the name of pass while registering it in the example. > On Jan 13, 2018, at 7:35 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 13 Jan 2018, at 03:45, Craig Topper via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

Hello All, I am instrumenting IR to pass addres of the function to runtime but I am getting error - Instruction does not dominate all uses. I used M.dump() to get below dump, not able to figure out what I am doing wrong. Any help would be much appreciated. define dso_local double @mysqrt(double %val1) local_unnamed_addr #0 { entry: %0 = bitcast double (double)* @mysqrt to i8* %1 = call

Hello, LLVM IR flattens out the structure with one integer element to i32. Is there any way to disable this? I want to preserve the type information of the structure. I tried compiling the program with O0, it maintains the type for most of the instructions but for all. Regards, Sangeeta -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Ahmed! Adventure wrote: > Hello everybody, I am a beginner in LLVM and need to know how to use > LLVM to instrument a C program and execute this instrumented program > with different test cases to determine the branch coverage information > for each test case. Any suggestion or help is more than welcomed. Thanks > in advance. Ahmed Raafat. (In the following instructions you

This is of course not homework. I am trying to understand how fast math optimizations work in llvm. When I compared IR for both the programs, the only thing I have noticed is that fdiv and fmul are replaced with fdiv fast and fmul fast. Not sure what happens in fdiv fast and fmul fast. I feel that its because d/max is really small number and fast-math does not care about small numbers and consider

Thanks. Just built clang and saw the meta data and annotations on the memory accesses -- is any opt pass consuming the information? By the way the build instruction in this page http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html needs to be updated -- it recommends config (with default settings) and build llvm in the source dir -- it leaves some 'sticky' generated files in the source dir leading to

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Xinliang David Li wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca >> <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: >> >> Xinliang David Li wrote: >> >> As simple as >> >> void foo (int n, double