similar to: can't extract diffs from llvm svn any more

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "can't extract diffs from llvm svn any more"

2009 Aug 10
3
[LLVMdev] svn down?
I've been getting this on svn update all day: svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': 403 Forbidden (http://llvm.org) Is this related to the server problems that have been going on for a while? -Dave
2011 Apr 22
3
[LLVMdev] svn server permissions for top-level svn update
Hi, My svn working copy mirrors the layout of the whole svn repository, from llvm-project downwards, so I have: ~/svn/llvm-project/ ~/svn/llvm-project/llvm/ ~/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/ # lots of stuff in here ~/svn/llvm-project/cfe/ ~/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/ # and lots of stuff in here (and likewise for test-suite, llvm-gcc-4.2 and dragonegg) This is nice because I can do "svn
2009 Aug 10
0
[LLVMdev] svn down?
On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:59 PM, David Greene wrote: > I've been getting this on svn update all day: > > svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' > svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': 403 Forbidden > (http://llvm.org) > > Is this related to the server problems that have been going on for a > while? > svn is
2009 Aug 11
1
[LLVMdev] svn down?
On Monday 10 August 2009 17:42, Tanya Lattner wrote: > On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:59 PM, David Greene wrote: > > I've been getting this on svn update all day: > > > > svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' > > svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': 403 Forbidden > > (http://llvm.org) > > > > Is
2007 Jul 25
0
[LLVMdev] svn issues
Hi David, On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:38 -0500, David A. Greene wrote: > I'm getting a lot of errors from svn like this: > > svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' > svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read response > body: Secure connection truncated (https://llvm.org) What is
2007 Jul 25
3
[LLVMdev] svn issues
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:06, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi David, > > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:38 -0500, David A. Greene wrote: > > I'm getting a lot of errors from svn like this: > > > > svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' > > svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read > > response
2007 Jul 25
3
[LLVMdev] svn issues
I'm getting a lot of errors from svn like this: svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read response body: Secure connection truncated (https://llvm.org) I've now been checking out llvm-gcc for two days. Is there a problem with the server? I don't have this issue with other
2007 Jul 25
0
[LLVMdev] svn issues
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:45, David Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:06, Reid Spencer wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:38 -0500, David A. Greene wrote: > > > I'm getting a lot of errors from svn like this: > > > > > > svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' > > > svn:
2017 Jun 25
2
IMPORTANT: LLVM.org server move complete (SVN impact please read)
Adding +Eric Liu <ioeric at google.com> who helps with Phabricator.... On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 3:15 PM Davide Italiano via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Anton Korobeynikov > <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > Thanks, fixed. > > > > Also, FWIW, phabricator commit mails are broken. Example: > >
2006 Aug 16
1
Re: 400 Bad Request error from svn
It's nice to see that the OS where CentOS gets its sources from also experiments the same error! I have been very busy lately so I haven't had the time to deal with the problem, probably later this week or early next week. As soon as I find something Ill let you know. Hopefully you'll do the same if you come across the solution first. PS. Forwarding this message to the mailing
2011 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] type-system-rewrite branch near landing
>>  ~/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches$ svn up >>  svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response >> to REPORT request for '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' > > I think that explicitly returns Forbidden just to avoid the strain on > the server; if you have any write access, you should have write access > to everything. Off topic, but
2010 Mar 30
3
[LLVMdev] Need help fixing 2.7 release blockers
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 17:45:16 David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:09:03 Tanya Lattner wrote: > > Please take a look at all release blockers: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586 > > 5893 is not release-critical according to Doug. > > 6640 appears to be a test system problem with a patch available (one of the > ones you're working on?)
2010 Apr 01
7
Press release: Virtual Communication Clouds :: New feature in Asterisk 1.8
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Puerto Escondido, Mexico, April 1st, 2010: Digium launches Asterisk VCC (TM) - a new virtual communication platform for enterprises, the public sector and the home. =========================================================== Asterisk 1.8 will contain a stunning new technology for all Asterisk users world- wide - virtual communication clouds or VCC (TM). With this
2014 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] phabricator says "this commit is still importing"
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > It seems that we cannot execute svn commands against llvm-project any more: > $ svn diff -r 208457:208458 'http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project' > svn: access to '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' forbidden > > Tanja, any idea what changed? > (Tanya, sorry for messing up the name,
2011 Jul 07
7
[LLVMdev] type-system-rewrite branch near landing
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: >> 1. Clang - Jay, do you have a patch for this? > > Yes. It's good enough to build most of LLVM+Clang, except for a couple > of files. But I'm running out of time and expertise to be able to fix > the remaining bits. Some specific concerns: > > 1. Many Objective-C(++) tests fail, because
2014 May 19
2
[LLVMdev] phabricator says "this commit is still importing"
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org> wrote: > On 12 May 2014 08:35, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> > wrote: > >> > >> It seems that we cannot execute svn commands against llvm-project any > >> more: > >> $ svn
2010 Mar 27
4
[LLVMdev] [repository] Make LLVM repository Git-clonable
Hi, As a Linux package maintainer I tend to follow LLVM mostly towards the end of each release cycle; nevertheless, I sometimes need to keep track of multiple LLVM branches at the same time. It would be great if I could use Git's SVN to clone the repository once, and then have the full version history available locally in a compact format. As a bonus, this will reduce the load on the server
2007 Jul 12
2
[LLVMdev] Installing clang
Really happy to hear llvm has the brand-new front-end. But, unfortunately, I failed to install it. When I 'svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk clang' in llvm/tools folder, I got this message.. svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default' svn: REPORT of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/vcc/default': 400 Bad Request (http://llvm.org) Am I missing
2011 Jul 07
0
[LLVMdev] type-system-rewrite branch near landing
> 1. Clang - Jay, do you have a patch for this? Yes. It's good enough to build most of LLVM+Clang, except for a couple of files. But I'm running out of time and expertise to be able to fix the remaining bits. Some specific concerns: 1. Many Objective-C(++) tests fail, because they use implicitly defined structs for various ObjC runtime data structures; the ASTConsumer
2017 Jun 25
2
IMPORTANT: LLVM.org server move complete (SVN impact please read)
Thanks, fixed. On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> LLVMers, >> >> We have completed the move to the new server for LLVM.org. One casualty of >> this move was that svn.llvm.org was NOT enabled