similar to: [RFC HACK] Make clang hate percpu.h less in 32-bit mode

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:55 AM Christopher Lameter <cl at linux.com> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:59:24PM -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > @@ -1576,7 +1578,9 @@ first_nmi: > > > addq $8, (%rsp) /* Fix up RSP */ > > > pushfq /* RFLAGS */ > > > pushq

From: "Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith at ieee.org>" > You are indeed correct (I must have been looking at the RHEL3 dir**) First off, that's now 2 strikes for me. Small ones considering the context well outside of the points, but still it hurts my credibility. This is one of the things I hate about meta-discussions, at least how I approach them. Sometimes I just need to learn

On Feb 14, 2019, at 1:47 PM, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > Any suggestions? Do a text install: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/361935/138

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 15:48, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > I've got an old server, that I'm *trying* to rebuild from C6. Our regular > key, with the kickstarts, etc, simply won't boot. Just a blank screen, and > it never goes anywhere. > > So I'm trying to build it from a year-old regular installer. > > 100% of the time, the graphical screen

On Feb 15, 2019, at 11:08 AM, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > To say "spend $20..." does not relate to "have to find a workaround to do > it *today*", nor to "this is a work system, I'm not driving out to > Microcenter to buy one?. What?s your hourly rate? How much did *not* driving out to Microcenter cost your employer? If you?re salaried,

> os level=## > into your smb.conf file and replace the ## with the level. > In my experience, samba needs an os level in the high 20's to show up > consistently for win95 machines. A level of 32 will make it the 'browse > master' which means that it will hold information about all other > win95/NT/3.11 machines in that workgroup. > yeah, i did it.. I still

> jeff at ntcor.com [SMTP:jeff at ntcor.com] wrote: > > I have a ssh enabled server and client machine (we'll call them "server" > and "client" respectively...) OK :-) > They both have proper RSA and DSA keys,using protocol version 2 works > fine between them. (so ssh itself and the network is working fine) OK. > However, I want to get something that

Until a couple of days ago, I could look in the AppDB like in a tree from category to category and I had the name of the application IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER. Now there is some field to click, search by rating .etc but if I want to find my application, I have to go through 200 applications rated by last entries. I seriously don't find anything anymore? Is it a change to make use of the google

Andrew Morton commented out some stuff to make lguest compile. This should actually make it work (in the latest -mm). Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> --- drivers/lguest/lguest.c | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) =================================================================== --- a/drivers/lguest/lguest.c +++

Andrew Morton commented out some stuff to make lguest compile. This should actually make it work (in the latest -mm). Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> --- drivers/lguest/lguest.c | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) =================================================================== --- a/drivers/lguest/lguest.c +++

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:23:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:53:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > > > + while (1) { > > > > + spin_lock(&pool->lock); > > > > + > > > > + /* > > > > + * prepare_to_wait() must come before steal_tags(), in case > > > >

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback: > > Looks reasonable. > > > lib/idr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > I still don't think it should be in this file.

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:44:54 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > > > > What guarantees that this wait will terminate? > > > > > > > > It seems fairly clear to me from the break statement a couple lines up; > > > > if we were passed __GFP_WAIT we

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:10:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:00:10 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Fixup patch, addressing

On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:23:58 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > I found things to be quite the opposite - it took 5 minutes of staring, > > head-scratching, double-checking and penny-dropping before I was > > confident that the newly-added code actually has nothing at all to do > > with the current code. Putting it in the same file was

On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:23:58 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > I found things to be quite the opposite - it took 5 minutes of staring, > > head-scratching, double-checking and penny-dropping before I was > > confident that the newly-added code actually has nothing at all to do > > with the current code. Putting it in the same file was

I have a ssh enabled server and client machine (we'll call them "server" and "client" respectively...) They both have proper RSA and DSA keys,using protocol version 2 works fine between them. (so ssh itself and the network is working fine) However, I want to get something that will work with rsync without having to manually enter passwords, passphrases, or enter such

On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > + spinlock_t lock; Remove the spinlock. > + unsigned nr_free; > + unsigned freelist[]; > +}; > + > +static inline void move_tags(unsigned *dst, unsigned *dst_nr, > + unsigned *src, unsigned *src_nr, > + unsigned nr) > +{ > + *src_nr -= nr; > + memcpy(dst + *dst_nr, src + *src_nr,

On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > + spinlock_t lock; Remove the spinlock. > + unsigned nr_free; > + unsigned freelist[]; > +}; > + > +static inline void move_tags(unsigned *dst, unsigned *dst_nr, > + unsigned *src, unsigned *src_nr, > + unsigned nr) > +{ > + *src_nr -= nr; > + memcpy(dst + *dst_nr, src + *src_nr,

Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback: Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> --- include/linux/idr.h | 2 +- lib/idr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/idr.h b/include/linux/idr.h index f0db12b..cdf39be 100644 --- a/include/linux/idr.h +++