similar to: [cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "[cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64"

2017 Feb 07
3
[cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64
> I’ve seen the same problem, but didn’t find solution back then. > I can give a hint that it is related to a thread local storage (notice TLS in the name). > > The same result can be reproduced by this simple program: > > thread_local int x = 0; > int main() { > return 0; > } > >When compiled into IR it produces similar error: > >LLVM ERROR:
2017 Feb 08
2
[cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64
What exactly do the compiler flags`-femulated-tls` and `tls-model` do ? Why does tls-emulation not solve the problem ? Looking at the generated IR, it seems not to remove thread_local variable declarations. What is the reasoning behind that ? 2017-02-07 16:27 GMT+00:00 Gaetano Checinski <gaetano.checinski at gmail.com>: > > got a minimal example now: > extern thread_local
2018 Apr 22
0
[cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64
Over one year passed now, did anybody made any progress regarding this issue? On 9 February 2017 at 16:33, Gaetano Checinski <gaetano.checinski at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm looking currently into a patch >
2017 Feb 09
1
[cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64
I'm looking currently into a patch <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/60b02baa5e1b3d7ffe6fbb428b343be17c58c583?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FJuliaLang%2Fllvm%2Fcommit%2Fa9e17b7f47f5afa9683fc8cfeff7020b2ff4a8b2%23diff-0fa8ca8690e36a8dfd05f6b751955164R339&signature=222c65b9d92c011f> which has been written for JuliaLang and is supposed to fix TLS for linux. Unfortunately it is based on
2017 Feb 08
0
[cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64
[Adding llvm-dev back to list] On 8 February 2017 at 11:12, Gaetano Checinski <gaetano.checinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for sharing your insights, > so in theory i could build an llvm pass that calls TargetLowering::LowerToTLSEmulatedModel for each llvm::Function and it should work if i link a runtime that provides __emultls_get_address. I'm afraid not, that function is
2017 Feb 08
3
[cfe-dev] lli: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64
> Unfortunately it doesn't look like lli has support for emulated TLS either, though that would be pretty simple to add. As an experiment I've `llvm::createLowerEmuTLSPass` into lli which added @__emutls_v.x and @__emutls_v.t. However i didn't have any __emultls_get_address calls in my IR. Is there a llvm pass or compiler-flag that replaces thread_locals with appropriate
2013 Aug 22
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC PATCH] X32 ABI support for Clang/compiler-rt
Ah, I've replied in a different thread already. What Dmitri says - If you're interesting in only building the Clang on x32 host, you may avoid checking out compiler-rt repo for now. On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Steven Newbury <steve at snewbury.org.uk> > wrote: > > I've
2013 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC PATCH] X32 ABI support for Clang/compiler-rt
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:29 +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > Ah, I've replied in a different thread already. What Dmitri says - If > you're interesting in only building the Clang on x32 host, you may avoid > checking out compiler-rt repo for now. > > compiler-rt does make a convenient compiler test though.. :) fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: 0x30ccf38: ch =
2020 Sep 22
3
EXTRAER MES EN LETRAS Y CASTELLANO
Buenas tardes, Estoy precisando generar una nueva variable que contenga el mes en tres letras, por ejemplo: ENE , FEB, MAR , ABR y así sucesivamente a partir de los valores que ahora tengo en el Dataset, que son 1, 2, 3, 4 y así sucesivamente. Entiendo que sería con mutate, pero consulto acerca del comando completo.. Gracias, Jesús _________________ *Jesús MARTÍN FRADE * Skype:
2020 Sep 13
3
CALCULAR SALDO DE CUENTA CORRIENTE
Pido ayuda para calcular el SALDO *DATAFRAME:* ASIENTO FECHA CUENTA CONCEPTO ARS_DEB ARS_HAB SALDO 1 1 2020-01-01 40100006 Asiento de Apertura 0 199517. -199517. 2 231 2020-01-13 40100006 15/01 CH53677071 GALICIA 14054. 0 14054. 3 231 2020-01-13 40100006 20/01 CH22406030 CREDICOO 9458. 0 23511. 4 231 2020-01-13
2020 Sep 23
2
ORDEN GRÁFICO POR MESES
Hola, Estoy haciendo un gráfico con: ############################################################################# ## GRAFICO BARRAS : VALORES AL DEBE MENSUALIZADO ggplot(Diario_S2, aes(x=mes_AAA, by = MES , y=ARS_DEB))+ # ASIGNAR VARIABLES geom_bar(stat="identity", width=0.7, # ANCHO BARRAS colour="grey", fill="darkgreen", #
2020 Sep 17
0
I wish to get actively involved in nouveau driver development
Hello everyone I'm a 2nd year Computer Science student in India. I'm proficient in C++, Data Structures and Algorithms, Linux and git. I've been using Linux for about 2 years now and shifted to Arch Linux with i3wm a year ago. I wish to get involved in nouveau driver development. Any kind of suggestions on how to get started with development would be great. Thank you. Regards -
2020 Sep 27
2
GRÁFICO DE BARRAS COMPARATIVO VARIOS AÑOS
Buenas noches, Tengo que preparar un gráfico de barras comparativo para varios años, en el que tenga agrupadas, 3 barras para enero, 3 barras para febrero, 3 barras para marzo y así sucesivamente para todos los meses, estando en cada mes, los años 2020, 2019 y 2018 (juntas), un pequeño espacio y luego las de febrero y así sucesivamente... Con el siguiente código, hago un año:
2010 Sep 22
0
[LLVMdev] r114523 (convert the last 4 X86ISD...) breaks clang
I will take a look in the next couple hours. Feel free to revert it in the meantime, thanks! -Chris On Sep 22, 2010, at 1:53 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote: > Hello, > > After commit r114523, I start to get crash when compiling with clang (Release+Asserts) for i386: > (I know I should fill a bug report instead of posting here, but I don't get
2010 Sep 22
2
[LLVMdev] r114523 (convert the last 4 X86ISD...) breaks clang
Hello, After commit r114523, I start to get crash when compiling with clang (Release+Asserts) for i386: (I know I should fill a bug report instead of posting here, but I don't get much time right now). Trying to compile the following simple code, clang asserts. ---------- round.c -------- #include <math.h> float test() { return llround(1); } -------------------- [MacPro:~/Desktop]
2017 Aug 15
3
How to debug instruction selection
Hi there, I try to JIT compile some bitcode and seeing the following error: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0x28ec830: ch,glue = X86ISD::CALL 0x28ec7c0, 0x28ef900, Register:i32 %EDI, Register:i8 %AL, RegisterMask:Untyped, 0x28ec7c0:1 0x28ef900: i32 = X86ISD::Wrapper TargetGlobalAddress:i32<void (i8*, ...)* @_ZN5FooBr7xprintfEPKcz> 0 0x28ec520: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<void (i8*, ...)*
2018 Sep 17
2
error about adding an trinsics
Hi,every one. This problem has been bothering me for several days.I really hope that you can help me. I want to add an trinsics in X86. This trinsics can compare two numbers and return the larger. There are the changes I do as fllowing. In /tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsX86.def : BUILTIN(__builtin_x86_max_qb, "iii", "") In include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsX86.td : let
2017 Jul 07
2
Error in v64i32 type in x86 backend
Have you read http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html and http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html ? http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html#instruction-selector describes how to define a store instruction. -Eli On 7/6/2017 6:51 PM, hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev wrote: > Please correct me i m stuck at this point. > > On Jul 6, 2017 5:18 PM, "hameeza ahmed"
2011 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] Long-Term ISel Design
On Mar 16, 2011, at 1:44 PM, David Greene wrote: > All, > > As I've done more integrating of AVX work upstream and more tuning here, > I've run across several things which are clunky in the current isel > design. A couple examples I can remember offhand: > > 1. We have special target-specific operators for certain shuffles in X86, > such as X86unpckl. I
2011 Mar 16
3
[LLVMdev] Long-Term ISel Design
All, As I've done more integrating of AVX work upstream and more tuning here, I've run across several things which are clunky in the current isel design. A couple examples I can remember offhand: 1. We have special target-specific operators for certain shuffles in X86, such as X86unpckl. I don't completely understand why but Bruno indicated it was to address inefficiecies.