similar to: Support for dynamic linking?

Of course Sven, questions regarding LLVM belong here (clang questions should be directed to cfe-dev). Developers on this list are usually very helpful when it comes to answering questions that are clearly stated and show that the person asking has done a reasonable amount of investigation and is just stuck. It usually helps to start with a succinct description of what it is you are trying to

Hi, I'm new here and I would like to know what's the best place to ask for some structural questions or help? If that's the right place, I'll send another email with the details and my question. Thanks in advance! Sven -- Sven SAULEAU +33 6 28 69 51 44

Hi Sam, Thanks for your answer! Sorry I didn't really know how to process, but this issue block me to make some legacy C code works without having some glue with a bit static lib ;( (The change have really low risk) The changes I used locally to make dlopen/dlclose et dlsym mechanism works :) : Index: wasm/Writer.cpp =================================================================== ---

Hello, The table generated by lld (Wasm target) have a max size. So this make impossible to add some others functions in the table . As for the moment only one Table is available in WAsm this is the only way to add function in a dynamic way. Having a none static size of the table is useful for a kind dynamic loader/inker at run-time: by adding some exported functions coming from another

wasm-ld is currently unable to link a shared wasm library (generated with `wasm-ld --shared`) with .o files and produce a working executable. I'm curious if there's a fundamental reason for this, or is this simply something that wasn't needed and could be implemented if needed. I think this could be done by - Resolving "GOT.mem" and "GOT.func" imports and

I cannot reproduce this error, but this could be real. David, is this reproducible every time or is this flaky? On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:03 PM Heejin Ahn via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello David, > > I use x86_64 and it works on my machine. I also can't find this error on > LLVM buildbot page. I'd appreciate if you help me reproduce the problem.

I'm seeing the following fail on Linux x86-64, for the last couple weeks at least. This is from 'ninja check-all'. -David FAIL: lld :: wasm/function-index.test (1941 of 1955) ******************** TEST 'lld :: wasm/function-index.test' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 1'; /build/x86_64/bin/llc -filetype=obj

Hi, i want to create an object which contains different classes: for example i have some time series and test if ARIMA models are best than HoltWinters models: for each of my time serie i want to collect in an unique object which model was the best: for some it will be an HoltWinters class and for some other an Arima class. is there any solution?? thanks in advance, with my best, erik sauleau

I''m working with three models: - Charge. has_many :budget_plans - BudgetPlan. belongs_to :charges, :rollups - Rollup. has_many :budget_plans This works out perfectly. A budget plan contains the ID of a charge and rollup and then there''s a 3rd attribute for hours. So working with data is no problem. My budget plan scaffold works nicely so I can select a charge, select a

Hi Sam, First, I want to know the symbol resolution semantics. I can imagine that that is set in stone yet, but just that you guys are still discussing what would be the best semantics or file format for the linkable wasm object file. I think by knowing more about the format and semantics, we can give you guys valuable feedback, as we've been actively working on the linker for a few years

Can you link to docs about the wasm object format? (both relocatable and executable) Also, traditional object file linkers are primarily concerned with concatenating binary blobs with small amount of patching of said binary blobs based on computed virtual (memory) addresses. Or perhaps to put it another way, what traditional object file linkers do is construct program images meant to be mapped

I have read the BUGS.txt file, used 'testparm' (successfully), and run through all the steps in DIAGNOSIS.txt. I don't see any problems that those tools have identified. The BUGS.txt file indicated that INTERNAL ERROR was almost certainly the result of a bug. I'm hopeful I have sent you the information you need. Let me know if there is something more I need to send. What

I realized that my choice of options for grep did not do a very good job of including the last error message before the INTERNAL ERROR. I've included it in this email. Sorry. create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. [2003/04/21 15:35:21, 0, pid=2798, effective(502, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(109) create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many

Sam Clegg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> Can you elaborate on semantically what the linker is actually doing for >> wasm? > > You are correct that the wasm linker does have more work to do than a > traditional linker. There are more sections that the linker will need > to re-construct fully. This is because there is more high level >

Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < > rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sam Clegg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> >> >> Can you elaborate on semantically what the linker is actually doing for >> >> wasm? >> > >> >

Using LLVM v5, my Cone compiler (https://github.com/jondgoodwin/cone) automatically directly generated all functions as named and exported for both wasm text and binary files (not using clang/lld etc, but using the API). Upgrading to LLVM v7, generated wasm object files now fail, exhibiting markedly different behavior, behavior that varies between the text and binary files. For example, the

(Currently using a build from november but I didn't see any commit that could fix this for wasm); With the wasm backend, %2 = icmp sgt i8 %0, -1 becomes: i32.const $4=, 255 i32.const $2=, 255 i32.and $3=, $0, $2 i32.const $5=, 255 i32.and $6=, $4, $5 i32.gt_s $7=, $3, $6 Which essentially does

Hello, Can you check whether your build includes r317710 <https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk at 317710>? Thanks, Dan On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Carlo Kok via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > (Currently using a build from november but I didn't see any commit that > could fix this for wasm); With the wasm backend, > > > %2 = icmp

Hi llvmers, As you may know, work has been progressing on the experimental WebAssembly backend in llvm. However, there is currently not a good linking story. Most the of existing linking strategies (i.e. those in the emscripten toolchain) involve bitcode linking and whole program compilation at link time. To improve this situation I've been working on adding a wasm backend for lld. My

Somehow I wish not all parts of a libc but parts that can be provided without a JavaScript wrapper for .wasm can be provided from llvm's libc (leaving a stab implementation for the rest like file system). I've put together a minimal libc on [1] so using a 26kb .wasm binary file one can decode both PNG and JPG using this [2] simple to integrate JavaScript code, can be easily ported in other