similar to: Latency in mails form llvm-dev / llvm-commits

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "Latency in mails form llvm-dev / llvm-commits"

2018 Mar 02
1
generating multiple instructions for a single pattern
Other suggestions 1/ Write a separate MI pass to split the macro MI which was generated earlier as a result of ISel to multiple MIs. 2/ Take the decision of splitting later in the pipeling during MC lowering. Decision about when you need to split should be driven by your intent to do any further processing over constituent instruction. ~ Jatin On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Jatin Bhateja
2017 May 05
2
Machine instruction verifier pass
Hello Devs, Machine Instruction verifier pass always validates Live variable info associated with MachineInstr along with other checks. Please consider following scenario (w.r.t bugZilla 32583) 1/ MachineCSE pass may prohibit optimising out a common sub-expression for instruction using physical registers by looking at the LiveIn info of successor basic blocks. 2/ Which means we need Live
2017 May 17
2
Machine instruction verifier pass
- Please do not add any more uses of the LiveVariables pass! It is deprecated and only kept around for one last pass that isn't converted. All new code should use LiveIntervalAnalysis! - Kill flags are optional: If they are present they must be correct, but it is legal to have a value die without having a kill flag on the operand. So often a simple fix is to clear out the kill flags from
2018 May 03
0
Any LLVM social in India/Asia?
No but we should think of arranging one. On Thu, May 3, 2018, 8:27 PM Jatin Bhateja via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Guys, > > Do we have any LLVM social for India/Asia. > > Wonderful concept to meet fellow community members and have technical > discussion. > > Cheers, > Jatin > _______________________________________________ > LLVM
2017 Nov 29
3
question: access IR class Instruction from DAG SDValue
Seems llvm cannot pass metadata to MachineInstr, or setting operand description in class Instruction and pass to class MachineInstr. Is it a good idea to extend llvm kernel structure to having this feature? Jonathan > On Nov 27, 2017, at 9:01 PM, Jatin Bhateja <jatin.bhateja at gmail.com> wrote: > > SelectionDAGBuilder contained within SelectionDAGISel has a map (NodeMap) b/w
2018 May 03
2
Any LLVM social in India/Asia?
Guys, Do we have any LLVM social for India/Asia. Wonderful concept to meet fellow community members and have technical discussion. Cheers, Jatin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180503/ce896912/attachment.html>
2017 Jul 02
3
Error while accessing reviews.llvm.org
Hello Devs, I am getting following error while connecting to review server. " A Troublesome Encounter! Woe! This request had its journey cut short by unexpected circumstances (Can Not Connect to MySQL)" Is anyone else facing this? Thanks [image: Inline image 1] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2018 Mar 02
0
generating multiple instructions for a single pattern
Hi Nagaraju, Few suggestions split this into following steps. 1/ DAG Legalization : Custom lower the instruction (branch in your case) appropriately in legalization to target specific DAG nodes and glue the nodes together which you want scheduler should schedule together. 2/ Instruction Selection : Define patterns to match the custom DAG nodes. Thus actual decision of creating multiple
2012 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] Lost commit mails
Hi, For what it's worth, I've also both "not received" a some email and been getting a _lot_ (5-6 within last month) of messages recently asking for "reactivation due to excessive bounces" related to the llvm & cfe commits lists. Now this _may_ be an issue in the systems after it's left the cs.uiuc.edu mailer, but FWIW the people in charge of monitoring the
2017 Sep 25
0
LLVM Weekly - #195, Sep 25th 2017
LLVM Weekly - #195, Sep 25th 2017 ================================= If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/195>. Welcome to the one hundred and ninety-fifth issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex
2015 Sep 25
2
issues with dev.new avoiding RStudio plot device on unix?
Hi R-devl, I'm still unable to force opening an *interactive* non-Rstudio platform-specific plot device on *unix* systems. dev.new() add a new argument 'noRStudioGD' in R 3.1.1. Thank you. It works for me when using RStudio on Windows, but on the unix system it opens a pdf device instead of an interactive device when using an interactive RStudio session (with R_DEFAULT_DEVICE
2015 Sep 26
0
issues with dev.new avoiding RStudio plot device on unix?
Can you describe your problem a bit more? * What kind of unix system do you have? * Can you run other X11 programs? I had a similar issue, and the problem was that the computer was not set up to support X11. As a minimum, you have to install /xauth/, and potentially also other libraries if you want to install packages from source. Best, Ott On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Skye Bender-deMoll
2011 Sep 03
1
Char dev error
Hello, I have been trying to migrate a guest from one host to another. But it is showing this error: virsh --connect qemu+ssh://root at host1/system migrate --live --undefinesource testvm3 qemu+ssh://root at host2/system tcp://host2:48160 error: operation failed: failed to retrieve chardev info in qemu with 'info chardev' I have tried this command from the host1 also but it shows the
2015 Sep 26
0
issues with dev.new avoiding RStudio plot device on unix?
On 26/09/2015 1:42 AM, Skye Bender-deMoll wrote: > Sorry, should have given more background. x11 works fine on all my > systems when called by x11(). I'm the maintainer of a package that uses > the animation library, which has performance issues when used with the > RStudio plot device. But if you call plot.new() when using RStudio, you > get an RStudio device, not the
2012 Nov 28
4
[LLVMdev] Lost commit mails
Hi, I just realized non of Patrik's commit mails has every reached llvm-commits. Neither my own archive nor the web interface contains commit messages for any of his commits. The relevant commits are 168785, 168516, 168507, 167924, 157381, 157323, 157320, 157319, 157184 Does anybody have any idea why those commit mails would get lost? Or did I just overlook something? Cheers Tobi
2015 Apr 14
0
Re: VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
Jatin, Using qemu without the virtio scsi and nic drivers is like running vmware with ide disks and e1000 nic instead of LSI disks and vmxnet3 nics, it forces the system to emulate completely different hardware. In linux the virtio drivers are implemented in the kernel, so you either need a new kernel or the virtio kernel modules. I'm not sure which for RHEL5, but I suspect you can get
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
with no problems. I have another Sun Enterprise 3000 running Solaris 2.51 and Samba 2.03 and I have no problems. Here is my smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from WC62092.rl.gov (130.97.35.96) # Date: 2000/09/27 10:36:58 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = HANFORD server string = Orasys Samba Server, version 2.07 security = SHARE encrypt passwords = Yes min password
2015 Jan 29
3
Very slow disk I/O
On 1/28/2015 11:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/28/2015 4:32 AM, Jatin Davey wrote: >> I am using RHEL 6.5 on my server. >> >> From top command i can see that the processors in my server are >> spending a lot of time on wait for I/O. >> I can see high percentage in terms of 30-50% on "wa" time. >> >> Here is the df output about the disk
2012 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
On 11/16/2012 02:47 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > >>> [cfe-commits] r167788 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Analysis/CFG.cpp test/Analysis/dead-stores.cpp >>> >>> with >>> >>> [cfe-commits] r167788 - Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try'
2012 Nov 16
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
I agree that the list name is redundant and should be dropped, but the revision number is compact and very useful... -Chris On Nov 15, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 11/16/2012 02:47 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> >>>>