similar to: Assertion in 'DwarfDebug.cpp'

Here are a couple things I would try to help triangulate on the problem. Try a vanilla upstream compiler for an in-tree target. (IIRC you have your own target.) If that fails, it's pretty optimal for you because you should be able to reduce a test case and file a PR. If it doesn't fail, that suggests it's either something your target does or doesn't do, or some bug in how

It is possible to ask DataLayout about getTypeSizeInBits and also getTypeStoreSize. And there is a table showing an example of what it could look like: /// Size examples: /// /// Type SizeInBits StoreSizeInBits AllocSizeInBits[*] /// ---- ---------- --------------- --------------- /// i1 1 8 8 /// i8 8 8

Hello: When I use SPSS I execute the AGGREGATE DATA comand for the next data: 2112141123212213212213334 3143244113442312121213344 2114141123112214212113344 2112211122212413421213221 3114444123442414343413344 2312231223212222323223322 2143241123212313131213234 2113241113212313222213333 2113141123112214212113344 2114141123412111114413344 2113211122342314222313234 2114141123112414212113344

Hi everyone, In order to have exceptions for non-call instructions (such as sdiv, load or stores), I'm modifying codegen so that it generates a BeginLabel and an EndLabel between the "may throwing" instruction. This is what the codegen of an InvokeInst does. However, when generating native code, only BeginLabel is generated, and it is generated after the instruction. I'm not

Hi Nicolas, > In order to have exceptions for non-call instructions (such as sdiv, > load or stores), I'm modifying codegen so that it generates a BeginLabel > and an EndLabel between the "may throwing" instruction. This is what the > codegen of an InvokeInst does. the rule is that all instructions between eh begin labelN and eh end labelN must unwind to the same

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this. Background Introduction I have a data set consisting of data collected from a questionnaire that I wish to validate. I have chosen to use confirmatory factor analysis to analyse this data set. Instrument The instrument consists of 11 subscales. There is a total of 68 items in the 11 subscales. Each item is scored on an integer scale between 1 to 4.

Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > >> In order to have exceptions for non-call instructions (such as sdiv, >> load or stores), I'm modifying codegen so that it generates a BeginLabel >> and an EndLabel between the "may throwing" instruction. This is what the >> codegen of an InvokeInst does. >> > > the rule is that all

Looks sane. Thanks. Evan On Feb 1, 2008, at 1:24 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Dear all, > > Here's a new patch with Evan's comments (thx Evan!) and some cleanups. > Now the (duplicated) exception handling code is in a new file: > lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITDwarfEmitter. > > This patch should work on linux/x86 and linux/ppc (tested). > > Nicolas > Index:

Hi, I am doing a hierarchical CFA using the sem package. I have 20 items, and I have 2 factors (F3 and F4), and also F1 and F2 are nested within F3. Here is the code that I have, but it is giving me an error message "Warning message: In eval(expr, envir, enclos) : Negative parameter variances. Model may be underidentified." and a further error "Error in summary.objectiveML(cfa,

On Nov 5, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In order to have exceptions for non-call instructions (such as sdiv, > load or stores), I'm modifying codegen so that it generates a > BeginLabel > and an EndLabel between the "may throwing" instruction. This is > what the > codegen of an InvokeInst does. > > However, when

DW_AT_stmt_list attribute's value is a section offset to the line no info for current compilation unit. If there is only one compilation unit generated per .o file then it is always zero. What kind of errors are you seeing ? - Devang On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Artur Pietrek <pietreka at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > While implementing debug info for our backend, we've

Hi Devang, Thanks for working on that. Unfortunately after your change it still doesn't work (I've tried x86 and our backend under Linux). The problem is that you put difference between two labels .Lset7 = .Lsection_line_begin-.Lsection_line ## DW_AT_stmt_list and that will be evaluated by assembler to a constant. It has to be a label, not a constant, because it is the linker who knows

Josh Matthews wrote: >> From DwarfDebug.cpp: > >> /// GetOrCreateSourceID - Look up the source id with the given directory and >> /// source file names. If none currently exists, create a new id and insert it >> /// in the SourceIds map. This can update DirectoryNames and SourceFileNames >> /// maps as well. >> unsigned

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be>wrote: > > On ELF platforms (at least Linux and FreeBSD) and on Windows, both of > the following are labels (i.e., absolute addresses to be relocated by > the linker) as opposed to offsets relative to the relevant section's > start, even though the DWARF standard says they are offsets: > *

>From DwarfDebug.cpp: >/// GetOrCreateSourceID - Look up the source id with the given directory and >/// source file names. If none currently exists, create a new id and insert it >/// in the SourceIds map. This can update DirectoryNames and SourceFileNames >/// maps as well. >unsigned DwarfDebug::GetOrCreateSourceID(StringRef FileName, >

I updated DwarfDebug to use section offset, instead of hard coding 0, to handle LTO properly. r107202. Thanks for brining this up. - Devang On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com> wrote: > DW_AT_stmt_list attribute's value is a section offset to the line no > info for current compilation unit. If there is only one  compilation > unit

Hi all, While implementing debug info for our backend, we've noticed a problem with debug_line section. We believe that the following code is wrong: // DW_AT_stmt_list is a offset of line number information for this // compile unit in debug_line section. It is always zero when only one // compile unit is emitted in one object file. addUInt(Die, dwarf::DW_AT_stmt_list, dwarf::DW_FORM_data4,

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Artur Pietrek <pietreka at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Devang, > Thanks for working on that. Unfortunately after your change it still doesn't > work (I've tried x86 and our backend under Linux). What errors exactly you are seeing ? > The problem is that you put difference between two labels > .Lset7 = .Lsection_line_begin-.Lsection_line ##

On 30 Jun 2010, at 18:40, Devang Patel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Artur Pietrek <pietreka at gmail.com> > wrote: >> The problem is that you put difference between two labels >> .Lset7 = .Lsection_line_begin-.Lsection_line ## DW_AT_stmt_list >> and that will be evaluated by assembler to a constant. It has to be >> a label, >> not a

David, Dean, all, The bots got red today with assertion failures in llvm::DbgVariable::addMMIEntry: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/1816/steps/check-msan%20in%20gcc%20build/logs/stdio I did not find the offender yet. Any ideas? clang-5.0: /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot1/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.h:131: void