similar to: [5.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

On 2017-09-08 14:33, Brian Cain via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hans, > > Sorry it's a little late -- I got a request for ubuntu x86_64. > > Uploaded clang+llvm-5.0.0-linux-x86_64-ubuntu16.04.tar.xz and > clang+llvm-5.0.0-linux-x86_64-ubuntu14.04.tar.xz This one has a different name than all the other releases :(. The other releases are named

Dear LLVM developers, Hello, I'm trying to find a way of cross-compiling my c code against Baremetal Cortex-M device (so target triple will be arm-none-eabi) only using LLVM/Clang, and not using anything from GNU (ld or libc). I'm doing this to know which one of LLVM/clang and GCC produces smaller flash image size because saving flash is a big deal in our projects. 1) When I just follow

On 31 Jul 2017, at 19:26, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: >> On 27 Jul 2017, at 00:41, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged. >>> >>> Please build, test and upload binaries

Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc2 was just tagged. I know we still have a bunch of open release blockers, but there has been a lot of merged patches and I'd like to find out what the status is. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. When uploading, make sure to use the /data/testers-uploads/ directory on the server. Let me know if there are any issues. I'll upload sources, docs and

Hello testers, 5.0.0-rc4 was just tagged. There were very few changes after rc3, and if nothing unexpected comes up, this is what the final release will look like. Please test and let me know if there are any issues. Cheers, Hans

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 27 Jul 2017, at 00:41, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged. >> >> Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know if >> there are any issues. > > Built and tested rc1. Test failures on

On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in > a better state now. > > 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. > > Please test, let me know how it goes, and upload binaries. Built, tested and uploaded: SHA256

Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc3 was just tagged. This is a release candidate in the real sense: if nothing bad comes up in testing, this is what the release is going to look like. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp (use the /data/testers-uploads/ directory) and let me know what issues remain. I know we're a little bit behind schedule, but hopefully we can get to 'final'

Dear testers, There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in a better state now. 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. Please test, let me know how it goes, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

Hi, I've just tagged 5.0.1-rc3, please test and report the results. Hopefully, this will be the last RC and the final release will be next week. -Tom

Hi James, renato, So how do I download the missing ARM libraries on Ubuntu14.04? I cannot find any available libraries. Best, Liyang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160425/04dfc553/attachment.html>

Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know if there are any issues. I'll upload sources, docs, and your binaries to the pre-release website once they're ready. Thanks, Hans

I provisioned a server with Samba4.3 from repo ubuntu16.04. I tested some things, but I can NOT connect to my Samba DC from the Windows DNS client. ADUC, AD Sites and services, and AD Domain & Trusts, connects Ok. But DNS [" Acces is Denied "] does not connect to the Samba4 DC. Any idea? What happens? _________________________________________ Ing. Felipe_ González_Santiago

On 06/05/2018 10:47 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 4 Jun 2018, at 18:01, Tom Stellard via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> The 6.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged. Testers may begin testing and >> reporting results. > > Built for FreeBSD 10, tested and uploaded: > > SHA256 (clang+llvm-6.0.1-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz)

Hi testers! 3.6.0-rc1 was just tagged, so testing can begin. I'm not super familiar with the testing script yet, but I believe the idea is to run it as follows: $ utils/release/test-release.sh -release 3.6.0 -rc 1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu With the -triple value substituted for your platform. Bill's 3.5rc1 email also said 'test-suite' needs to be run by hand. Please

On 28 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> I have promoted RC4 to final; 3.7.0 has reached its final state. >> >> Thanks for all your hard work so far. Please build and upload binaries >> with "-final", and let's ship this next

Hi, (please note the mailing list is libguestfs@redhat.com, and -owner@ is the address of the mailing list administrators.) On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 13:02:29 CET Aditya Suripeddi wrote: > I want to avail the virt-cusomize , virt-sysprep and other > commands for configuring of my vm instances on my ubuntu14.04 machine . > Installing the libguestfs-1.24.9 has generated 2

Hello, I've been trying to write out the options: "defaults,barrier=1" in the /etc/fstab file on ubuntu16.04 BUT always obtain a read-only file system. So, what's new with Ubuntu Xenial Xerus? Do you keep the same fstab options? Help!

Hi, I just tagged LLVM 4.0.1-rc3, and it's ready for testing. If all goes well, we will do the final release on Monday. -Tom

flight 22184 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22184/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 22106 test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 9 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 22106 Regressions which are regarded as