similar to: what is this address meaning?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "what is this address meaning?"

2019 Aug 03
0
Samba generating wrong ipv6 and ipv4 address
My config is this: # Global parameters [global] # bind interfaces only = Yes # if this is turned on, always perfect # interfaces = lo 192.168.78.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93 # interfaces = lo 192.168.78.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93 192.168.81.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 # interfaces = lo 192.168.81.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 # if all interfaces
2019 Aug 05
0
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
the dig is wrong as well, it adds an additional ip address, which i have not request to use other interfaces: root at server:/# dig p3x-dc.patrikx3.com ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1-Debian <<>> p3x-dc.patrikx3.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 11190 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0,
2019 Aug 03
0
Samba generating wrong ipv6 and ipv4 address
sorry i mean dnsupdate, if i use bind9 with samba dlz dnsupdate does not work, so i have to leave it out. my problem is that i got 2 interfaces and still it 2 dual stack ip addresses, the 192.168.78.0/24 is correct. the 192.168.81.0/24 is giving 192.168.81.120 instead of 192.168.81.20. i found the whole root since "/" with grep there is no 192.168.81.120 at all. only in my router there
2019 Aug 03
2
Samba generating wrong ipv6 and ipv4 address
Hey! How are you? I have two interfaces (192.168.78.20 / *2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93* and 192.168.81.20 / *2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92*) I have interfaces disabled i mean that i bind on everything on samba ac-dc... What here is what is weird, (via bind9 DLZ i am using it and is working), but on my clients i am getting some weird ipv6 addresses: patrikx3 at bitang:~$ ping
2019 Aug 05
0
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
the patrikx3.com is my domain my AD DC domain is p3x-dc.patrikx3.com, you can see: root at server:~# cat /etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com ; Replaces on ennp1s0f2 to ennp1s0f3 ; 192.168.81. 192.168.78. ; 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93 ; format is done with xed Linux Mint, not using tab, only space $TTL 3600 @
2019 Aug 05
2
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
samba generates an unknown ip4 and ip6 address. here is my settings: root at server:/# ifconfig enp1s0f2: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.81.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.81.255 inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> inet6 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 prefixlen 64 scopeid
2019 Aug 03
2
Samba generating wrong ipv6 and ipv4 address
On 03/08/2019 03:01, Patrik via samba wrote: > My config is this: > # Global parameters > [global] > # bind interfaces only = Yes > # if this is turned on, always perfect > # interfaces = lo 192.168.78.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93 > # interfaces = lo 192.168.78.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93 > 192.168.81.20 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 > #
2019 Aug 03
0
Samba generating wrong ipv6 and ipv4 address
the problem is that dnsupdate is not working becuase i use dlz. i cannot use dbsupdate with dnsupdate it fails. *Patrik* WWW <https://patrikx3.com> | GitHub <https://github.com/patrikx3/> | NPM <https://www.npmjs.com/~patrikx3> | Corifeus <https://corifeus.com> | +36 20 342 8046 On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 9:22 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org>
2019 Aug 05
0
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
That is because your resolving setup is wrong. You problem starts here. Checking file: /etc/resolv.conf search patrikx3.com search corifeus.com search p3x-dc.patrikx3.com The first 2 will do nothing, only last will be used that setup. You want : search p3x-dc.patrikx3.com patrikx3.com corifeus.com But still thats not needed, you only need. search p3x-dc.patrikx3.com Because the other
2019 Aug 05
0
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
I am not using flatfiles and i using BIND_DLZ it shows in my log and i do not use flatfiles. BIND_DLZ only. as you can see it is pure bind and it just generates a weird ip address (192.168.81.120, 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:eeaa:a0ff:fe1b:4d84) this ip addresses cannot be pinged, missing this client. you can see in smb.conf i do not use dnsupdate either. and it is rotating and sometimes giving the wrong ip
2014 Feb 13
0
Samba 4.0.13 on FreeBSD 9
Hi, I installed Samba 4.0.13 from ports and ran.. sudo mv /usr/local/etc/samba /usr/local/etc/samba.3 sudo mv /usr/local/etc/smb.conf /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.3 sudo vi /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.3 # Add realm entry sudo mv /var/db/samba /var/db/samba.3 sudo samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/usr/local/etc/samba.3 --use-ntvfs /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.3 When I try and start I get.. sudo samba
2014 Aug 25
0
network configuration on DomUs
Hi I'm very new with Xen (/Debian) I have 2 VMs running Windows: "Arch" and "Sql" -- static IPs VM Arch: is ok, accessible thru VNC, Remote Desktop, see the network, etc VM Sql : - just accessible thru VNC             - once I log in, I don't see the network             - pings don't reach peer             - appear 4 network ports on Windows the server has 4
2019 Aug 05
0
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
If i may. Rowland is right, below is not going to work as you want it to work. Bind9_flatfile with samba will be removed soon, because.. Its not supported. Read : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/The_Samba_AD_DNS_Back_Ends Which states. Do not use the BIND9_FLATFILE DNS back end. It is not supported and will be removed in the future. And then this part. [router-logs] path =
2019 Aug 05
1
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
but as i shown in my config i use bind9, why do you say i am using BIND9_FLATFILE DNS? root at server:/# cat etc/bind/named.conf.local // Consider adding the 1918 zones here, if they are not used in your // organization //include "/etc/bind/zones.rfc1918"; // the order is important!!!! first internal, then external!!! view "internal-enp1s0f3" { match-clients {
2018 Aug 20
0
[PATCH 1/2] v2v: rhv-upload-plugin: Handle send send failures
The oVirt server may fail a PUT request before reading all request body. However before closing the connection, it writes a detailed error response, that will make debugging issues like expired tickets much easier to handle. If we don't get the response and log the error, the error may be lost when the daemon log is rotated. Change pwrite() and emulate_zero() to get the response after EPIPE,
2004 Jan 13
3
IPSEC btwn stable and Linksys BEFVP41 stopped working.
Hi, I have been using IPsec to communicate between a laptop that tracks -stable and a Linksys BEFVP41 router. I only use it infrequently, but it's been working great. My setup is as described in http://grapeape.alerce.com/linksys-ipsec/article.html (which I am planning to submit to the handbook when it's done). I'm no longer able to make an ipsec connection, and I can't put my
2013 Sep 14
7
[Bug 852] New: IPv6 TEE target sends packets to original IP address on wrong network device
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=852 Summary: IPv6 TEE target sends packets to original IP address on wrong network device Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: unknown
2003 Jun 30
2
Problem with decoding number of codebooks
Hello, I'm trying to write a Vorbis decoder (just as a hobby) but I've got a problem with reading the setup header. According to the Vorbis documentation the first data that should be read after the initial 'vorbis' string is an eight bit integer which when incremented by one, contains the number of codebooks in the header. My problem is that whenever I read this number it seems
2013 Sep 11
8
[Bug 851] New: IPv6 SNAT target with --random doesn't work
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851 Summary: IPv6 SNAT target with --random doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
2016 Oct 04
0
Virtualization Networking
> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was