similar to: Updating LLVM Publications Page

On 10/26/17 11:42 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Oct 26, 2017, at 8:34 AM, John Criswell via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> To update the publications page, do I still modify pubs.js within the >> Subversion repository? I've added three new papers using LLVM

> On Oct 28, 2017, at 4:45 PM, John Regehr via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>> Incidentally, despite what that page says, 2009 was not the peak of llvm-related-and-using publications. It would be great for someone to do a survey of papers out there and get more papers listed on the page. It would be a great starter project for someone who was interested in

Dear Mihail, I've added these two publications to the publications page. Please review it and let me know if I need to make any changes. In particular, if you have URLs to use for the papers, having those would be greatly appreciated. Regards, John Criswell On 11/28/17 12:05 PM, Mihail Popov via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to submit two papers that use LLVM

Folks, I just added two publications to www-pubs (r280004), as it used to be, but it seems the results are not up yet: http://llvm.org/pubs/ Also, my SVN www-pubs seems to only have papers up to 2012, while the page has it up to 2015. I'm confused, what's the right way to update pubs nowadays? cheers, --renato

Hello, I would like to submit two papers that use LLVM to the Related Publications section. Both papers focus on code isolation applied to perform piecewise compiler optimizations. The code isolation process is performed by CERE, an open source tool based on LLVM. The second paper is an extended version of the first one. 1) Piecewise Holistic Autotuning of Compiler and Runtime Parameters

Dear Chandler, First, can you articulate why you want to move the test suite to Github? Is it taking up too much space, or is there some other problem that you're trying to solve? I think you clearly explain why moving the revision history isn't necessary, but it's not clear to me what problem you are trying to solve. Second, if we move the revision history to Github, it would

Hello, We have published two papers which build upon the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure. Would it be possible to include them in the LLVM related publications at http://llvm.org/pubs/ ? I attach below the bibliographic references: "CERE: LLVM Based Codelet Extractor and REplayer for Piecewise Benchmarking and Optimization" P. de Oliveira Castro, C. Akel, E. Petit, M. Popov, and W.

On 3/22/16 11:15 AM, Om Shivom Nagpal wrote: > Sir, > I am interested in adding a new analysis or optimization pass and > building the getting started guide as a project for gsoc. Okay. Decide which of these two projects you'd like to propose and write up a description of the project. Be sure to include some details. For example, if you're going to improve the

On 11/29/17 7:42 PM, Zvonimir Rakamaric via llvm-dev wrote: > Counterexample-Guided Bit-Precision Selection I've added this publication to the publication list. Please let me know if I need to make any corrections. Regards, John Criswell -- John Criswell Assistant Professor Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester http://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/criswell

Hi Will, John Criswell thought that perhaps you've gotten DSA (but not poolalloc) working with the mainline LLVM code. If that's true, is that something you intend to share? I for one would love to be able to use it. - Christian On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:06 PM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Christian, > > First, I've never used CMake to

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, Qiuping Yi wrote: > Hi, John Criswell > > Thank you very much. > > I am installing LLVM-3.2, but I encounter the next error when carrying > out "make": Is this error occurring when compiling the version of Clang within SAFECode or standard Clang? If it's the former, you should know that you don't need to compile SAFECode to use

Sir, I am interested in add a new pass. I have read about analysis, transformation passes. Can you help me with some example ideas? On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:39 AM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/22/16 11:15 AM, Om Shivom Nagpal wrote: > > Sir, > I am interested in adding a new analysis or optimization pass and building > the getting started guide as a

Dear Simon, Kevin is correct; as far as I can tell, there is no method of getting the functions calling a given function. Instead, you have to start at the main() function and search for the function using a depth-first or breadth-first search. What may make sense is to build a new data structure that has nodes that point from callees to callers once and then use that for your queries.

On 1/30/15 10:24 AM, Qiuping Yi wrote: > I am just not upgrade my LLVM. So I must use some higer LLVM version, > right? Yes. For working with poolalloc, I would recommend using LLVM 3.2 as we know poolalloc compiles with LLVM 3.2. If there's a release_29 branch for poolalloc, you could use that, but you won't get any bug fixes that we added between poolalloc 2.9 and poolalloc

On 2/25/15 10:51 AM, Simone Atzeni wrote: > Thanks John. > > I guess I will use a ModulePass, so when I am implementing the “runOnModule” function, > do I have to loop through all the functions, for each functions all the BasicBlocks and for each BasicBlock all the instructions If you know the Instruction, you can get it's basic block using Instruction::getParent(), and then get

On 3/17/16 10:58 AM, Om Shivom Nagpal wrote: > No i have not worked previously on llvm. I have looked through the > projects but because of no prior experience i am unable to pick one. I > am currently going through the llvm tutorials. I would recommend a project that has you working at the LLVM IR level. Fixing bugs or adding a new analysis or optimization pass may be a good

On 3/8/15 8:56 AM, Mingxing Zhang wrote: > Hello John, > > According to the FAQ, I can submit two proposals although at most one > of them can be accepted. > Thus I will prepare a proposal for each of the two projects. Correct. Only one proposal will be accepted. > And, after reading the code of cfl-aa and several related papers, I've > listed four milestones for the

On 2/24/16 4:25 PM, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote: > I don't really care where the repository is located, but I do have > some comments on the future test-suite directions: > >> On Feb 24, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Subject kinda says it all.

Hi Simon, > From: Simone Atzeni <simone.at at gmail.com> > To: John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Walking thru CallGraph bottom up > Message-ID: <318EBA41-2040-4EFE-B330-5813C817C2A2 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > I think I got it and the example is

Sir, I am interested in adding a new analysis or optimization pass and building the getting started guide as a project for gsoc. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:29 AM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/17/16 10:58 AM, Om Shivom Nagpal wrote: > > No i have not worked previously on llvm. I have looked through the > projects but because of no prior experience i am