similar to: Minimal glibc version supported by LLVM build

Reverted: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL314922 On Oct 4, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: + Rui, the patch author Do we know what the oldest glibc which works with this patch is? For context, the most recent REHL 5 ships with glibc 2.5. REHL 6 ships with 2.12 and REHL ships with 2.17. I have evidence

Our build system is setup to deliberately use a very old environment.  We've found that's one of the most reliable easy ways to ensure we don't accidentally introduce a dependency on a newer system library than intended.  This lets us ship prebuilt binaries which run on a wide spectrum of systems.  We're going to chat internally and check to see if we can roll this forward a

On Oct 4, 2017 2:31 PM, "Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > Our build system is setup to deliberately use a very old environment. > We've found that's one of the most reliable easy ways to ensure we don't > accidentally introduce a dependency

This sounds fine to me (and sorry for the delay!). -- Sanjoy On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Chawla, Pankaj <pankaj.chawla at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Sanjoy, > > So what is the verdict on this issue? > > Thanks, > Pankaj > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chawla, Pankaj > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 11:12 AM > To: Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at

Hi, while taking a look at X86PadShortFunction.cpp I found that /// addPadding - Add the given number of NOOP instructions to the function /// just prior to the return at MBBI void PadShortFunc::addPadding(MachineBasicBlock *MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator &MBBI, unsigned int NOOPsToAdd) { DebugLoc DL = MBBI->getDebugLoc();

Hi Pankaj, On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Chawla, Pankaj <pankaj.chawla at intel.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply! > Would it be possible for you to implement this? I don't have cycles for this right now, but if you file a bug I can give this a shot when I have time later. Even in the best case this will have to at least wait until end of April because I'm leaving for a

Hi Sanjoy, Thanks for the reply! Would it be possible for you to implement this? You know the codebase better than I do. Thanks, Pankaj -----Original Message----- From: Sanjoy Das [mailto:sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 1:34 PM To: Chawla, Pankaj <pankaj.chawla at intel.com> Cc: Maxim Kazantsev <max.kazantsev at azul.com>; Serguei Katkov

Hi Sanjoy, >> I'm a bit apprehensive of adding more caching to solve problems created by caching; but if there is no way out of adding another cache, how about adding a cache that maps SCEV expressions to their simplified versions? Then we could do something like: I may be wrong but I think caching is not an issue in itself, but caching in the presence of self-recursion is. >>

Hi Sanjoy, So what is the verdict on this issue? Thanks, Pankaj -----Original Message----- From: Chawla, Pankaj Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 11:12 AM To: Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> Cc: Maxim Kazantsev <max.kazantsev at azul.com>; Serguei Katkov <serguei.katkov at azul.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: RE: [SCEV] Inconsistent SCEV formation for

Hi, +CC Max, Serguei This looks like a textbook case of why caching is hard. We first call getZeroExtendExpr on %dec, and this call does end up returning an add rec. However, in the process of simplifying the zext, it also calls into isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond which in turn calls getZeroExtendExpr(%dec) again. However, this second (recursive) time, we don't simplify the zext and cache a

Hello All, I filed a bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35884 which I want to fix but I'm in trouble with detecting who is wrong :) The story is as follows: LoopDeletion tries to delete an invariant loop which has a def with use in some unreachable block. The IR is well-formed due to any use in unreachable block is dominated as Verifier states. LoopDeletion detected the loop as

Hi Sanjoy, SCEV is behaving inconsistently when forming SCEV for this zext instruction in the attached test case- %conv5 = zext i32 %dec to i64 If we request a SCEV for the instruction, it returns- (zext i32 {{-1,+,1}<nw><%for.body>,+,-1}<nw><%for.body7> to i64) This can be seen by invoking- $ opt -analyze -scalar-evolution inconsistent-scev-zext.ll But when computing

Dear Community, I'm trying to implement optimization described in PR26223 and meet the following bail out condition in CodeGenPrepare::optimizeMemoryInst. // Break use-def graph loops. if (!Visited.insert(V).second) { Consensus = nullptr; break; } So while traversing thorough phi nodes from memory instruction to find addr mode we bail out if we meet some instruction

Hi, We had received a new EMC storage (Clariion CX4) and the EMC analist has told us that CentOS aren't on their support list, but RHEL are :) Well anybody on the list has a CentOS host talking (iSCSI) with an EMC storage, preferably using the EMC Powerpath software, and can talk about you experience? Or I will need to buy some REHL licenses ? I'll put my hands on it only next

Hi Samba, My name is Travis Kuter and I'm with HP's Solution Alliance org. I've got a client asking if Samba Internet Services 3.5 is supported under REHL 5. Would you mind helping with some clarification? Many thanks and Best Regards, Travis Travis Kuter WW ISV Business Development ESS Solution Alliances Hewlett-Packard Company Travis.Kuter at hp.com +404-664-2596

On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Hanno B?ck <hanno at hboeck.de> wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:19:02 +1100 (AEDT) > > Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > > >> What version of OpenSSH is this? > > > > 6.8 portable on Linux. > > There are a *lot* of Linux flavors. Which one?

Okay, joining hosts to a pool, cant seem to be completed due to different cpu types, research i should be able to mask one can anyone confirm this is doable with these two boxes, and if so which should be masked to which ?? xe host-cpu-info cpu_count : 8 vendor: GenuineIntel speed: 2493.790 modelname: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU

Hi, I am trying to install puppet-dashboard on my puppet server, which is running CentOS 5.4. However, I cannot find a RPM for REHL 5 on http://yum.puppetlabs.com/. So the question is how I can get the puppet-dashboard rpm for CentOS 5.4? Thanks. Hai Tao -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send

Some how I''m getting NameError: uninitialized constant when accessing a child models that inherits form the parent model. However, if I access the parent model first, then the child model is resolved. What am I doing wrong? My steps are below... Thanks, Francis. > ./script/generate model Blah type:string class CreateBlahs < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table

In the root llvm/CMakeLists.txt we have: if( ${PYTHON_VERSION_STRING} VERSION_LESS 2.7 ) message(FATAL_ERROR "Python 2.7 or newer is required") endif() But lit seems to still be stuck in a Python 2.5 world. For example, detectCPUs is redundant now that we have multiprocessing.cpu_count() (multiprocessing requires >=2.6). And there are a bunch of other Python 2.5 workarounds