similar to: variadic functions on X86_64 should (conditionally) save XMM regs even if -no-implicit-float

Thanks for reviving this topic! Interestingly we have essentially the same fix you mention below ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D62639) as a local change in our Wind River version of LLVM. The reason we didn't try to push it upstream (and in fact have considered removing it) is due to an unfortunate side-effect which is either "expected" or a "bug" depending on your

A handful of files in compiler-rt/builtins use the macro "__SOFT_FP__". All the uses are along the same lines. Here's a representative example from compiler-rt/lib/builtins/fixdfdi.c: #ifndef __SOFT_FP__ // Support for systems that have hardware floating-point; can set the invalid // flag as a side-effect of computation. ... #else // Support for systems that don't have

Hi all, I am observing an excessive use of xmm registers in the output assembly produced by x86 backend. Basically, for a code like this double test(double a, double b) { double c; c = 1.0 + sin (a + b*b); return c; } llc produced somthing like.... movsd 16(%ebp), %xmm0 mulsd %xmm0, %xmm0 addsd 8(%ebp), %xmm0 movsd %xmm0, (%esp) ....... fstpl

All, I've been working on a new scheduler and have somehow affected register selection. My problem is that an xmm register is being used as an index expression. Specifically, addss (%xmm1,%rax,4), %xmm0 I like the idea of a floating-point index, but, like the assembler, I don't know what that means. Any suggestions on where I should look for a solution to my problem?

This patch simplifies XMM -> int64 conversion in fixed_intrin_sse2.c and fixed_intrin_ssse3.c -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fixed_sse.zip Type: application/zip Size: 778 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20140813/49f18196/attachment.zip

I think I should have posted this question here as well. I am posting my question here since it is R related. Please see below. I originally posted this to sci.stat.math "Nasser Abbasi" <nma at 12000.org> wrote in message news:Mm4gj.28843$R92.4987 at newsfe16.phx... > > I think R documentation is a bit hard for me to sort out at this time. > > I was wondering if

Hello everybody, I have stumbled upon a test case (the attached module is a slightly reduced version) that shows extremely reduced performance on linux compared to windows when executed using LLVM's JIT. We narrowed the problem down to the actual code being generated, the source IR on both systems is the same. Try compiling the attached module: llc -O3 -filetype=asm -o BAD.s BAD.ll Under

hi; When I first started looking at R code, I thought that the <- notation for assignment made the code less readable (and I still do). Then I found that now one can use "=" in place of "<-" for assignment (I understand this started since version 1.4). Anyway, I think using "=" makes the code much more readable. I was wondering, would it be safe if I

On 10/2/19 5:12 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: On 10/1/19 12:35 AM, Serge Pavlov via llvm-dev wrote: Hi all, This proposal is aimed at support of floating point environment, in which some properties like rounding mode or exception behavior differ from those used by default. This include in particular support of 'pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS', 'pragma STDC FENV_ROUND' as well as some other

On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:35 AMPDT, Ralf Karrenberg wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I have stumbled upon a test case (the attached module is a slightly > reduced version) that shows extremely reduced performance on linux > compared to windows when executed using LLVM's JIT. > > We narrowed the problem down to the actual code being generated, the > source IR on both systems

everyone-- The OCaml bindings need help again. diff -r a8c05e69647e import/llvm.org/llvm/bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.ml --- a/import/llvm.org/llvm/bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.ml Fri Dec 25 17:35:09 2009 -0800 +++ b/import/llvm.org/llvm/bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.ml Sun Dec 27 11:38:15 2009 -0800 @@ -42,13 +42,18 @@ | External | Available_externally | Link_once + | Link_once_odr | Weak +

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> This is needed in order to be able to support guest code that uses movsd to write into pages that are marked for write tracking. Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 27

The following tiny patches make opus and opusfile to use xmm intrinsics for lrintf() with mingw-w64 builds when targetting x64 instead of their default x87 asm. Regards. -- O.S. diff --git a/celt/float_cast.h b/celt/float_cast.h index ed5a39b..b9b8484 100644 --- a/celt/float_cast.h +++ b/celt/float_cast.h @@ -61,7 +61,14 @@ ** the config.h file. */ -#if (HAVE_LRINTF) +#if

I am implementing a new calling convention for X86 which requires to pass a 256 bit integer vector with two XMM registers rather than one YMM register. For example define <8 x i32> @add(<8 x i32> %a, <8 x i32> %b) { %add = add <8 x i32> %a, %b ret <8 x i32> %add } With march=X86-64 and mcpu=corei7-avx, llc with the default calling convention generates the

Hello all, I got this problem while trying to shape traffic with iptables MARK and HTB. MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4 --set-mark gives "invalid argument" error message. Kernel version is 2.4.29 (some patches from patch o matic applied) Iptables version 1.3.4 Intel x86 architecture. I saw this problem discussed in a few places, but the discussions didn''t come to a conclusion

Hi, As a Linux package maintainer I tend to follow LLVM mostly towards the end of each release cycle; nevertheless, I sometimes need to keep track of multiple LLVM branches at the same time. It would be great if I could use Git's SVN to clone the repository once, and then have the full version history available locally in a compact format. As a bonus, this will reduce the load on the server

I have a doubt. If you use such a script monitoring the link status with ping and then reconfiguring, why do you need the DGD patch? You need to do some reconfiguration (change multipath to a single default route) anyway if you use the script, right? Also, the DGD patch uses src to lookup the routing table entry, but if you have a dynamic IP for the WAN interface (PPPoE, DHCP etc), this approach

Hi, I am working on linux 2.6.16.I tried to prioritize traffic using prio module but its not working well.It always maps to same class irrespective of ToS.Is it possible to fix it using filters?Anybody fixed this problem? -- Regards Archana Rajagopal _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

*since i''m totally new to this technology , im facing lots of difficulties here.* * * *i want to create a form with few fields which shud be connected to mysql database using ruby on rails. can anyone help me with this difficulty?* * * *thanks..* * * *regards * * * *mandrekar salim* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

can any one tell the the procedure to create the login form for the project using netbeans or any IDE? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to