similar to: CentOS 4.5 - Apache 2.0.52

Hi all, I am facing facing performance issues with our web servers which is working for concurrent 250 requests properly and then stops responding when the requests are more than 250 . The current configuration parameters are as follows : apachectl -version Server version: Apache/2.0.52 Server built: Jan 30 2007 09:56:16 Kernel : 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 16:36:54 EDT 2007 x86_64

I'm trying to fix a CentOS (5.5 x86_64) VM that we have where it become unstable due to swapping. But I did notice something: I have 10 httpd processes, and 5 of them are using 13 MB of resident memory, the other are using between 91 and 96 MB of RAM. I find it quite strange to see such differences in RAM usage. I ran a "lsof -P -p" on the processes, and I didn't see any major

http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_20.html states that Apache 2.0.52 is 4 years old and the latest version is 2.0.68. i am no longer a httpd expert, but at least one of the security fixes involves XSS attacks via malformed ftp commands. I also realize that redhat / centos may patch things separately from Apache and that the sysadmin has a great deal to do with how secure things

> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the

I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference. Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd. And that doesn't make any difference. Any suggestion from

> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>> that >>>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but

Hi. There isn't a package httpd-2.0.52-41.ent.6.centos4 for centos4 in UPDATES repo. There is only a httpd-2.0.52-41.ent.6.centos4.src.rpm in SRC [http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/SRPMS/?C=M;O=D] This is probably a bug. Package httpd doesn't build ? Jancio Wodnik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

<preamble> I have deployed Linux/Apache/PHP (node1) + MySQL (node2) with Security Groups (AWS) or iptables controlling who can connect to the MySQL server. In topology terms -- a 2 Tier architecture. In AWS - one can deploy several such instances behind a ELB. Each LAP instance talks to a MySQL RDS. The LAP instances are either mod_php or PHP-FPM. OS -- CentOS, Ubuntu. Debian

Hi! Is it safe to run phusion passenger with all apache kinds of MPM? regards -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Not sure where to start on this. I went to examine a log file today and noticed a password protected internal file was being accessed from 16.0.0.0. Upon further review every log entry has the same IP. Accessing apache from localhost also reports 16.0.0.0. Google is not being my friend right now, any advice? Kernel: 2.6.9-89.0.29.Elsmp In the chroot: httpd-suexec-2.0.52-41.ent.7.centos4

I think I am encountering a download file size limit on centos 4 with httpd-2.0.52 The file in question is 5.2G in size, it does not show up in a browser directory listing, and I'm getting the error in the http error_log value too large for defined data type: access can someone confirm that there is a 4GB limit (or other) in the standard apache 2.0 on CentOS 4? Tony Schreiner

Hello all, I love CentOS, but I am seriously regretting selecting Centos 4.4 for my production hosting servers. The current situation with CentOS 4.4 and being stuck at Apache 2.0.52 is a huge problem because of the new requirements for the Credit Card industry PCI scan. Apache 2.0.52 does not pass PCI compliance scans. which means no ecommerce on any of these servers - MAJOR ISSUE. So my

Hi, I could not find any reference if the version of apache compiled for centos 5.x has support for more than 256 clients in apache's maxclients. If that is not the case how can I recompile the package with such support? Regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

One of our systems run Apache 2.0.52 (httpd-2.0.52-12.2.ent.centos4 rpm). The kernel we're running is 2.6.9-11.ELsmp. After a few weeks of uptime, Apache refuses to start with the following error in error.log: [crit] (28)No space left on device: mod_jk: could not create jk_log_lock With Apache not running, there're a lot of semaphores left behind by Apache, e.g.: ------ Semaphore

Hey guys, We had to recompile apache 2.4.12 because we needed to disable thread safety in php (ZTS). Because for some reason when compiling php with the --disable-maintainer-zts with the worker mpm model and checking the php info page, it was saying that thread safety was still enabled. So when we recompiled apache to use the prefetch worker model instead of worker, the php info page was

Hi, I need some guidance to pinpoint a potential problem and I'm not sure where is the problem. I have a setup with: centos 4.4 dvd on i386 mailscanner uebimiau (webmail) 2.7.10 httpd-2.0.52-22.ent.centos4 httpd-suexec-2.0.52-22.ent.centos4 dovecot-0.99.11-2.EL4.1 The thing is that 3 of my 45 users complained that from the webmail the address book and the sent items are missing. Cheking those

Has anyone gotten Apache 2.0.54 to build on CentOS 4.1? Apache 2.0.52(distrbiuted with CentOS 4.1) compiles file. This is the error: /scratch/apache2.src/httpd-2.0.54/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -pthread -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -DAP_HAVE_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZER

Hi list! We tested mod_antiloris 0.4 and found it quite efficient, but before putting it in production, we would like to hear some feedback from freebsd users. We are using Apache 2.2.x on Freebsd 6.2 and 7.2. Is anyone using it? Do you have any other way to patch against Slowloris other than putting a proxy in front or using the HTTP accept filter? Thanks for your feedback, Martin

I would like to start a discussion centred around the various ways one might serve up configuration files from an Asterisk server (I know, it's better to use a secondary server for all this, but let's talk about a smaller system). The types of things being served would include: - Logo image for sets that support that - XML directory files - XML or raw text configuration files -

I've got httpd and mod_perl installed, but I seem to have an application that requires part of mod_perl that doesn't seem to be properly installed into perl, notably, the 'Apache' portion. To 'fix' this, cpan would like to install either mod_perl-1.29, or alternatively to install mod_perl-2.0.2. 1.29 doesn't seem smart, and 2.0.2 absolutely will not install over the