similar to: [SCEV][ScalarEvolution] SE limitation impacting LV

Thanks for the feedback, Sanjoy. > SCEV is fairly conservative around PHI nodes that aren't recurrences and aren't obviously equivalent to a min-max branch-phi idiom. Is that the limitation you're running into here? Yes, that's exactly the problem. The problematic PHI nodes (%bc.resume.val and %bc.resume.val1) aren't either recurrences or related to min-max idioms. I

Hi! I uploaded a tentative patch for the following bug in LV (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34965) but I have some concerns about it. I would appreciate if someone with more experience in SE/PSE can provide some feedback about current tentative fix and alternative solutions described in the comments. Thanks! Diego Caballero, Intel Vectorizer Team

Can you explain why you need them as 'integer', A floating point representation can hold a value upto ~4.5e15 as an "integer" keeping the precision that you might need. Jim Holtman Data Munger Guru What is the problem that you are trying to solve? Tell me what you want to do, not how you want to do it. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Andr? Luis Neves <andrluis at

Amara, >I support this direction Thanks for the support. >but are there actually any real world workloads where gather/scatter scalarisation would be worth it, on any micro-architecture? If we don’t have examples and the compile time cost is non-negligible then I think we’d still like to keep the early >bailouts in some form.’ It's not like I have specific application code in

On 01/05/2018 06:28 PM, Saito, Hideki wrote: > Amara, > >> I support this direction > Thanks for the support. > >> but are there actually any real world workloads where gather/scatter scalarisation would be worth it, on any micro-architecture? If we don’t have examples and the compile time cost is non-negligible then I think we’d still like to keep the early >bailouts in

Dear all: I converted the columns (Baci, Meti, Fungii, Protozoai) into integers (using excel) and then imported the data (.txt) into R. Interestingly, the other three variables were loaded as INT, but the 'Baci' one continued as Num. I imported the data using the following command line: X <- read.delim(file.choose(), header = TRUE, dec =

Thanks, Hal. I plan to post a patch w/o HW Legality early bailout first. That should enable further discussion on where the initial very high cost for "illegal masked load/store/gather/scatter" should be coming from --- like should LoopVectorize provide it? Or should it be provided by TTI? I prefer the latter (TTI) but the first revision of the patch will intentionally do the former

> On 5 Jan 2018, at 21:01, Saito, Hideki via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > All, > > I'm trying to refactor LoopVectorize such that it has better conformance to VPlan vision going forward > (http://www.llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VectorizationPlan.html). All VP*Recipe class definitions are now > moved to VPlan.h, and I have a patch under review

Dear all, I am a biologist. I have two sets of distance P(start1, end1) and Q(start2, end2). The distance will be like this. P ------------------------ Q ---------------------------------------- I want to know whether P falls closely to the right end or left end of Q. P and Q are of different lengths for each data point. There are more than 10000 pairs of P and Q. Is there any test or

> Suppose you have four lifetime operations on the same address in memory, > with loads and stores all around them: > > start1--end1 .. start2--end2 > > If you remove start1 then you have a bare pointer, the memory came from > somewhere and you lose the optimization that loads before start1 become > undef, but you don't miscompile. This is assuming no looping after

All, I'm trying to refactor LoopVectorize such that it has better conformance to VPlan vision going forward (http://www.llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VectorizationPlan.html). All VP*Recipe class definitions are now moved to VPlan.h, and I have a patch under review to move LoopVectorizationPlanner class out of LoopVectorize.cpp (https://reviews.llvm.org/D41420). Next thing I'm working on is

>> Oh, I was reading "precedes/following" as having static (dominance) >> meaning. That is, in the above example you could not delete the store >> since it is not true that >> llvm.lifetime.end dominates it. >> >> Nick, is this what you had in mind? If not, then we must delete a >> matching llvm.lifetime.end, but it is not clear how we define

On 12/27/2012 12:35 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: >>> Oh, I was reading "precedes/following" as having static (dominance) >>> meaning. That is, in the above example you could not delete the store >>> since it is not true that >>> llvm.lifetime.end dominates it. >>> >>> Nick, is this what you had in mind? If not, then we must delete a

+ MLIR dev mailing list since that’s where the OrcJit I’m using is. Thanks for all the details, Lang! What you described is exactly what I’m looking for! Please, MLIR dev, let me know if this debug feature and the solution that Lang describes below is interesting for MLIR. I’ll dig more into the details then but it doesn’t seem too complicated. Thanks, Diego From: Lang Hames [mailto:lhames at

Hello all, Could someone help me with the time zones in understandable & practical way? I got completely stucked with this. Have googled for a while and read the manuals, but without solutions... ------------------------------------------------------------------- When data imported from Excel 2007 into R (2.13) all time variables, depending on date (summer or winter) get (un-asked for

When I sink the output of an RWeka model to a text file, the output file appears empty: library(RWeka) model = LogitBoost(Species~.,data=iris) print(model) sink("output.txt") print(model) #file output.txt is created, but it is blank sink() Am I doing anything wrong? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R helpers Suppose val1 = c(10, 20, 35, 80, 12) val2 = c(3, 8, 11, 7) I want to select either val1 or val2 depending on value of third quantity val3. val3 assumes either of the values "Monthly" or "Yearly". If val3 = "Monthly", then val = val1 and if val3 = "Yearly", then val = val2. I tried the ifelse statement as ifelse(val3 =

Hi, i do have a dataframe representing data from a repeated experiment. PID is a subject identifier, Time are timepoints in an experiment which was repeated twice. For each subject and all three timepoints there are 2 sets of four values. df <- data.frame(PID = c(rep("A", 12), rep("B", 12), rep("C", 12)), Time = rep(c(0, 0, 0, 0, 30, 30, 30,

Hi, I'm trying to plot stacked barplot with lines on it. Here is the data. emp days val1 val2 score 1 21 1 0 1200 2 35 1 1 na 3 42 na na 3000 4 53 2 1 2100 5 64 1 0 na 6 73 na na 1400 My X-axis is days. I'm looking to plot val1,val2 as stacked bars and score as lines with different y-axis. I could get the bar plot and lines on it but the problem is the bars and lines are not aligning

input: > values [1] 0.854400 1.648465 1.829830 1.874704 7.670915 7.673585 7.722619 > thresholds [1] 1 3 5 7 9 expected output: [1] 1 4 4 4 7 That is, need a vector of indexes of the maximum value below the threshold. e.g. First element is "1", because value[1] is the largest below threshold "1". Second element is "4", because value[4] is the