similar to: Retrieving DbgInfoIntrinsics for a given value

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Retrieving DbgInfoIntrinsics for a given value"

2016 May 29
1
How to find variable names from LLVM IR?
If I have an operand as a Value from an instruction like: Value* V = opnd->get(); and I am sure this is a variable, I want to know the variable name (in source code) for this Value object. I am doing it like this: const Function* Func; if (const Argument* Arg = dyn_cast<Argument>(V)) { Func =
2015 Jan 08
5
RFC: getifexists() {was [Bug 16065] "exists" ...}
In November, we had a "bug repository conversation" with Peter Hagerty and myself: https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16065 where the bug report title started with --->> "exists" is a bottleneck for dispatch and package loading, ... Peter proposed an extra simplified and henc faster version of exists(), and I commented > --- Comment #2
2015 Jan 08
4
RFC: getifexists() {was [Bug 16065] "exists" ...}
If we do add an argument to get(), then it should be named consistently with the ifnotfound argument of mget(). As mentioned, the possibility of a NULL value is problematic. One solution is a sentinel value that indicates an unbound value (like R_UnboundValue). But another idea (and one pretty similar to John's) is to follow the SYMSXP design at the C level, where there is a structure that
2012 Nov 13
1
mdX and mismatch_cnt when building an array
CentOS 6.3, x86_64. I have noticed when building a new software RAID-6 array on CentOS 6.3 that the mismatch_cnt grows monotonically while the array is building: # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md11 : active raid6 sdg[5] sdf[4] sde[3] sdd[2] sdc[1] sdb[0] 3904890880 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
2015 Jan 08
2
RFC: getifexists() {was [Bug 16065] "exists" ...}
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:57 AM, <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Michael Lawrence wrote: > > If we do add an argument to get(), then it should be named consistently >> with the ifnotfound argument of mget(). As mentioned, the possibility of a >> NULL value is problematic. One solution is a sentinel value that indicates >> an unbound value
2015 Jan 09
2
RFC: getifexists() {was [Bug 16065] "exists" ...}
>>>>> Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:00:38 +0100 writes: >>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>> on Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:02:26 -0800 writes: >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:57 AM, <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: >>> On Thu, 8
2008 Jun 20
4
wine 1.0 and ie 5.5
ok, i'm NO expert but I can learn a LOT of things. I have used wine very sparingly in the past, enough to know that IE, outlook and a few other "Win Only" apps will run. So when wine 1.9 was released i figure i HAD to have it. but BOY its a lot different. Installation was smooth, MDV rpms work as expected, but thats where it ends. I use the same IE5.5 install source I have used
2008 Oct 04
2
posix acls and reiserfs
hi smbusers, would like to ask some questions about posix acls and reiserfs.help and info is much appreciated.(to make it clear i am running mandriva 2007 free edition with samba 3.0.23d installed.) 1. is acl supported now on reiserfs filesystems by default? 2. do i have to recompile the kernel and apply the acl patch? (i currently have the 2.6.17 kernel) 3.which is best for samba?xfs?ext3? or
2008 Nov 26
1
Request for Assistance in R with NonMem
Hi I am having some problems running a covariate analysis with my colleage using R with the NonMem program we are using for a graduate school project. R and NonMem run fine without adding in the covariates, but the program is giving us a problem when the covariate analysis is added. We think the problem is with the R code to run the covariate data analysis. We have the control stream, R code
2007 Jul 31
2
Ham Radio s/w and CentOS? {including Echolink}
I am going to present Linux to my ham radio club at some point in the next few months, and wanted to collect info on ham radio software, including options for echolink. Our repeater has an echolink connection, thus if I present the software available for it, it might perk up people's interests more. It would also be very helpful if the echlink applications offered proxy/firewall options
2013 Jul 22
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add warning capabilities in LLVM.
----- Original Message ----- > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > wrote: > > Sorry, just getting caught up on an old thread. I haven't been > > involved in discussions of this. > > > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> > > wrote: > >> First, let me try to clarify my
2006 Jan 30
3
Samba and add printer drivers from xp
Sorry, i send again this message because i m not sure it was realy sent the first time Hi i use samba server with winxp box on our lan from 3 years and before i can "upload" the xp drivers from a xp machine to samba server without any problem's but recently after un hard disk crash, i upgrade my mandriva server to the last release mdv (2006.0) and now i wasn t able to upload
2006 May 12
2
Re: Can Garmin's (MapSource) USB map-card reader be used in Wine?
Hello, I tried to install Mapsource 6 in Wine (20050211.2) on MDK LE2005 but it didn't install... The same with GIDroute which installed but didn't want to be launched. I will give it a try on MDV 2006 but I don't expect a miracle. And the pseudo map applications for Linux are not really what we can consider as useful and easy to handle with... Ciao @+ CWO4 Dave Mann wrote: >
2006 Jan 26
3
oplocks and Excel
I have a small business client with a new samba file server. It's CentOS 4.2 and Samba samba-3.0.10-1.4E.2. When they save open Excel files from Windows, they are prompted to overwrite the existing file. I mean, when they click the little disk icon or use Ctrl-S or File--Save. Excel would normally just write over the file, not check with an "are you sure?" prompt. But that's
2015 Jan 08
1
RFC: getifexists() {was [Bug 16065] "exists" ...}
> Adding an optional argument to get (and mget) like > val <- get(name, where, ..., value.if.not.found=NULL ) (*) > would be useful for many. HOWEVER, it is possible that there could be > some confusion here: (*) can give a NULL because either x exists and > has value NULL, or because x doesn't exist. If that matters, the user > would need to be careful about
2015 Jan 08
0
RFC: getifexists() {was [Bug 16065] "exists" ...}
Adding an optional argument to get (and mget) like val <- get(name, where, ..., value.if.not.found=NULL ) (*) would be useful for many. HOWEVER, it is possible that there could be some confusion here: (*) can give a NULL because either x exists and has value NULL, or because x doesn't exist. If that matters, the user would need to be careful about specifying a value.if.not.found
2015 Jan 08
1
RFC: getifexists() {was [Bug 16065] "exists" ...}
On 08/01/2015 9:03 AM, John Nolan wrote: > Adding an optional argument to get (and mget) like > > val <- get(name, where, ..., value.if.not.found=NULL ) (*) That would be a bad idea, as it would change behaviour of existing uses of get(). What I suggested would not give a default. If the arg was missing, we'd get the old behaviour, if the arg was present, we'd use it.
2015 Jan 08
0
RFC: getifexists() {was [Bug 16065] "exists" ...}
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Michael Lawrence wrote: > If we do add an argument to get(), then it should be named consistently > with the ifnotfound argument of mget(). As mentioned, the possibility of a > NULL value is problematic. One solution is a sentinel value that indicates > an unbound value (like R_UnboundValue). A null default is fine -- it's a default; if it isn't right for
2013 Jul 22
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add warning capabilities in LLVM.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Sorry, just getting caught up on an old thread. I haven't been involved in discussions of this. > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote: >> First, let me try to clarify my proposal, in case there was any confusion about that. LLVMContext already has a
2015 Jan 09
0
RFC: getifexists() {was [Bug 16065] "exists" ...}
>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>> on Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:02:26 -0800 writes: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:57 AM, <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: >> On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Michael Lawrence wrote: >> >> If we do add an argument to get(), then it should be named consistently >>>