similar to: Bind Problem

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hey, I am trying to get spf working and it just doesn't want to take. On my Tiny/DJB server it was easy. Anyway here is my entry. $ORIGIN net. itadmins 14400 IN SOA ns1.itadmins.net. hostmaster.itadmins.net. ( 2012102201 16384 2048 1048576 2560 ) 14400 IN A 178.15.51.221 14400 IN

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Over the past weekend, I added SPF screening on the MTA at shorewall.net. SPF is a mechanism for a domain to use DNS to publish a list of those IP addresses that are used to send legitimate email from that domain. A receiving MTA can use that published information to determine if email from a domain is being sent through an MTA belonging to that

Hello all, I am trying to configure a subdomain DNS server on a Cent OS 5.1 - for my lab. Brief configuration: Lab machine ---> 192.168.17.2 (should respond to DNS queries from hosts in 192.168.16.0/20 network) 1. I would also like to forward any queries outside the above network to our corporate domain (no firewalls between our 192.168.16.x network and the corporate network. The domain

This caused a crash on a 2.6.10-1.12_FC2smp kernel May 19 09:56:35 spf1 kernel: Assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint() at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:361: "drop_count != 0 || cleanup_ret != 0" May 19 09:56:35 spf1 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ May 19 09:56:37 spf1 kernel: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:361! May 19 09:56:37 spf1 kernel: invalid operand: 0000 [#1] May 19

Your spf record is broken: dovecot.org. 39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all" -- Jim Flowers <jflowers at ezo.net> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Hello ppl, Any way to specify alphabetical exten patterns in the dialplans on Asterisk? All my users would have alpha/numerical ids. I don't want to add a line for every user in my dialplans. I searched around, but couldn't get anything useful. Any way to get around this? Thanks in advance - Benjamin Jacob. EMAIL DISCLAIMER : This email and any files transmitted with it are

Hello, I have dns zone domain.com configured on nsd server. If a try #dig axfr @localhost domain.com then i receive correct answer, but if i try #dig a @localhost domain.com then i received nothing but should be 127.0.0.1 How can i troubleshoot this problem? output: [root at ns1 ~]# dig axfr @localhost domain.com ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1-RedHat-9.8.3-2.P1.fc15 <<>> axfr

Hello Everyone, I am used to messing with bind zones directly. With samba 4, I cannot do that. Is the following the correct way to add a TXT record for SPF to the zone using samba-tool? /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add s4server.example.org example.org example.org TXT "v=spf1 mx -all" I am not sure it is because it is showing up with dig as "v=spf1" "mx"

On 05/08/2019 11:53, Patrik wrote: > the ?? file "/etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com > <http://patrikx3.com/>"; are my domain names A, AAAA, CNAME-s, that is > where i store then, there is know AD records at all. it is all DLZ. > *_ > _* If 'patrikx3.com' is a registered dns domain name, then you should have used a subdomain of this for the AD dns

I am inquiring about how to setup a proper SPF record. I know there are SPF wizards/generators available but each seem to have a different "opinion" of what should be included and what should not be included. Let me give you a scenario of my setup, and hopefully someone can help me out. My domain is: test.com My mailserver hostname is: mail.host.com which also has a MATCHING PTR

Subject: Re-configuring BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel Web Hosting Control Panel on Amazon AWS Cloud Author: Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming, Singapore Date: 27 Feb 2020 Thursday Rationale for Re-configuration of BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel ======================================================================= I have originally followed the approach for cPanel where there

On 7/25/19 1:10 PM, hw wrote: >> >> Configure all dns servers as primary slaves (plus 1 primary master) for >> your own domains.? I have never seen problems with resolution of local >> dns domains when the Internet was down. > > It seemed to have to do with the TTL for the local names being too > short and DNS being designed to generally query root servers rather

On 7/25/19 6:48 AM, rainer at ultra-secure.de wrote: > Am 2019-07-25 15:41, schrieb hw: >> On 7/25/19 2:53 PM, rainer at ultra-secure.de wrote: >>> Am 2019-07-25 14:51, schrieb hw: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are >>>> sending queries, be increased? >>>>

hi I plot a series of observation data every minutes in a day as the attachment below plot(wnd,type='l',lty=1,col='red',lwd=1,xlab=xxlab,ylab=yylab,ylim=YY) In the figure, the x-axis tickment is the number of data How can I change it fore example 1h 2h 3h 4h and so on ? -- TANG Jie Email: totangjie at gmail.com Tel: 0086-2154896104 Shanghai Typhoon Institute,China

the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that comes through yum. everything is up to date. i am hesitant to install a new package manually as that could cause other compatibility issues? is there another way to test the configuration on the server? On 21/10/2016 01:07, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 10/20/2016 om 7:38 PM schreef Matthew Broadhead: >> do i need to provide

do i need to provide more information? On 19/10/2016 14:49, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > /var/log/maillog showed this > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/smtpd[1298]: 7599A2C19C6: > client=unknown[127.0.0.1] > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/cleanup[1085]: 7599A2C19C6: > message-id=<edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk> > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/qmgr[1059]:

is there something more i need to be doing my end? On 25/10/2016 09:11, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > are there any instructions or tests i can make to check the sieve > configuration? or does the magic all happen internally and there are > no settings to change? > > On 21/10/2016 10:22, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that

Op 19-10-2016 om 13:47 schreef Matthew Broadhead: > i am not 100% sure how to give you the information you require. > > my current setup in /etc/postfix/master.cf is > flags=DRhu user=vmail:mail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d > ${recipient} > so recipient would presumably be user at domain.tld? or do you want the > real email address of one of our users? is there

Dear All I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading , google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve the issue. My named.conf looks as below. * * * // named.conf // // Provided by Red Hat bind package to configure the ISC BIND named(8) DNS // server as a caching only

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1667 Summary: sshd slow connect with 'UseDNS yes' Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: