similar to: New LLVM License

Sorry for belaboring on a possibly minor point here, but is my understanding correct that even assuming that the case function is always inlined so we don't have extra function call overhead, we have the redundant if (!Result) checks when we use StringSwitch as opposed to a bunch of if- elses. Thanks. On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Anupama Chandrasekhar < anupama.lists at gmail.com>

Hi: I have a question about the llvm StringSwitch class. Why is this more efficient than comparing the hashes of the strings or just using a bunch of if statements. Anupama -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160205/9be0fcc8/attachment.html>

> On Feb 5, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > >> On Feb 5, 2016, at 2:43 PM, Anupama Chandrasekhar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi: >> >> I have a question about the llvm StringSwitch class. Why is this more efficient than comparing the hashes of the strings or just

unsubscribe Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations --------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** Legal Disclaimer **************************** "This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is

Hi, I am new to lattice graphics and have the following question. I have a dataframe d2: cat PointsInTime MeanScore 1 Parent Intake 26.25000 2 Youth Intake 9.75000 3 Worker Intake 20.63636 4 Parent Discharge 24.00000 5 Youth Discharge 15.60000 6 Worker Discharge 23.90909 and to produce a plot I am using the following code print(xyplot(MeanScore ~

I too would like to know the status of the opus IP holders. From what I've seen on the CELT and opus lists, it seems that the CELT part of opus is covered by patents from Xiph and Broadcom, and the SILK part of opus is covered by the rest. All of the IP holders except Qualcomm and Huawei have released their patents to the public as far as opus is concerned, and the general consensus from

Dear Sir, I am using R 2.13.1. Since yesterday when I start the Rgui the message "Save Workspace Image?" shows up immediately on opening. Even if I cancel, it does not get cancelled. If I select either no or yes, it quits. I do not know all of a sudden what happened? Right from yesterday I am trying my best to run R but am not able to do so. Please help. Thanks -- Dr. TR

all, below command not reporting the actual usage report on dovecot 2.2.13. please share your suggestion to how to fix this issue doveadm -f flow mailbox status -A -t 'messages vsize' '*' is just showing rkreddy messages=0 vsize=0 jcplho messages=0 vsize=0 planning messages=0 vsize=0 accounts messages=0 vsize=0 spam.notify messages=0 vsize=0 jsraju messages=0 vsize=0 amarnath

A while back Josh was thinking of changing the Flac license, and posted a question on Slashdot regarding various licensing schemes. Josh, have you come to any conclusions about future licensing of Flac? - Woody _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

Hello everyone, This email is a continuation of a discussion from almost a year ago, started back here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091536.html As described in that email, this is a complicated topic and deals with sensitive legal issues. I am not a lawyer, and this email is not intended to be legal advice in the formal sense. That said, I have spoken with many

On Sun, October 27, 2019 9:37 am, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Why do you care about the server license if you're writing an application > (i.e. a client)? Not the OP, but I will tell you why it is important. GPL, as you know, is put in place to protect the opensource aspect of the code, and as such requires the changes be published for modifications that are done on top of the existing

Hi Timo, I can't find licensing information in http://hg.dovecot.org/imaptest. Can you tell what is the license for this utility? I'd like to package it for ALTLinux Sisyphus repository. -- Sergey Ivanov

hi, i talked to timo about re-licensing the sasl part of dovecot under a more liberal license (bsd/lgpl e.g.). it would allow the integration of it in bsd base systems. another reason i would be interested is adding sasl support to svnserve [1]. so here is my question: what is your oppinion about this issue? any objections from contributors? darix [1] http://subversion.tigris.org/ -- irssi

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to: >> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.

I am writing a package for a company for its internal use only. What is an appropriate license statement for the DESCRIPTION file? I would like a statement which reflects the private and proprietary nature of the package, giving copyright to the writer and the company. I also don't want to violate the licensing of R and the packages I am using (RODBC, ggplot2, zoo). David Scott --

Hey guys, I have a question about CrossOver and the LGPL license. I'm looking into licensing some software of my own and I'm not sure if I can. >From what I've read the LGPL license doesn't allow any product to be sold if it's based on LGPL protected software, unless it uses the software simply as a plug-in: > A program that contains no derivative of any portion of the

On 29 October 2015 at 10:25, Jonas Maebe via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding the previously voiced concerns of incompatibilities between the > Apache and GPLv2 license, I'd like to add one more thing. > > I work on a, at this time mostly LLVM-unrelated [1], "GPLv2 or later" > licensed compiler: the Free Pascal Compiler. Some

Dear Folks, I am just starting out with Markdown and am trying to get two elements working: (1) An inline HTML link; and (2) An inline mailto: link as shown in the text below: We invite you to [browse] (http://academy.swanlotus.com/index.html) this website. Take a look and see if you find anything useful. And do [drop us a line] (mailto:feedback at swanlotus.com) with your comments for

I've extracted the asterisk-addons-1.2.2.tar.gz file and don't see a COPYING or LICENSE file, nor is there a mention of GPL or BSD in the README file. asterisk-sounds is BSD licensed, so it's not entirely clear how asterisk-addons is licensed -- though I would guess GPL. Can anyone clarify the licensing for asterisk-addons? Thanks, CJM

I've been having problems segfaulting when receiving faxes. So I tried FFA. I used the register utility and my license is in /var/lib/asterisk : ls /var/lib/asterisk/licenses/ -l total 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 325 Jun 5 22:41 FFA-DNCXXXXXXX.lic but: Executing [17772822954 at FaxIncoming:4] ReceiveFAX("SIP/ec2faxcall18-00000002",