similar to: Re: CentOS Digest, Vol 38, Issue 15

Hi, I'm considering setting up my Centos Desktop machine for RAID 1. I read a lot of good info at this site:http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Hardware/sata.html#intel-vitesse about differences in fakeraid and real raid cards. The hardware I plan on installing this RAID card into is an Intel DP35DP motherboard with the Intel E4500 dual core processor, and I have two Mator 500 gig SATA hard drives.

I recently set up a new system to run backuppc on centOS 5 with the archive stored on a raid1 of 750 gig SATA drives created with 3 members with one specified as "missing". Once a week I add the 3rd partition, let it sync, then remove it. I've had a similar system working for a long time using a firewire drive as the 3rd member, so I don't think the raid setup is the cause

Hello, First, excuse me if this messages is not in the right mailing list: I have not found a samba-ldap forum. I try to use Samba-LDAP with my own object class but I cannot manage using an other attribute than 'uid' for the user ID. Here is my objectClass: --------------- myClass.schema ----------------------------------- attributeType ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.13460.1.18.1 NAME

On Wed, January 7, 2015 10:33 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Every regular file's directory entry on your system is a hard link. >> There's >> nothing particular about links (files) that make a filesystem fragile. > > Agreed, although when there are millions, the

In respose to my "when is update 3 coming out?" I received the following mail from brian.trudeau at eastek-intl.com offlist. Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [04E-0B7CC3CC-3842]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. Thank You, Support Staff

Hi, I just ran an install of OpenOffice 2.31 on Centos 5.1 using these instructions - http://www.melvilletheatre.com/articles/openoffice-fedora/index.html Install seemed to go fine until I finished and then tried to start up K writer and none of the OO apps will start up from the menu. even though they are all showing up in start menu that 2.3 is installed. I'm using KDE mostly but have

I'm trying to find a way to get remote connections from my Linux Desktop machine to a remote Linux box which is hosting a MySQL database, via SSH port 22, and then once connection is established, log in to the database port 3306 and have either an SSH and or SCP connection established so I can securely do edits and queries. I am able to connect this way from my Windows machine to remote

2.4.18 kernel) using 3 x 60GB WD 7200 IDE drives on a 7500-4 controller I could get peak I/O of 452 MBytes/sec, and a sustainable I/O rate of over 100 MBytes/sec. That is not exactly a 'dunno' performance situation. These tests were done using dbench and RAID5. Let's get that right: 100 MBytes/sec == 800 Mbits/sec, which is just a tad over 100 Mbits/sec (the bottleneck if you use

Im assuming, that because I never filled out a support ticket with these people that someone else has done so using my email address. Anyone else experiencing anything like this? Or is this normal from the CentOS mailing list? The topic in the email is a topic ive responded to on the list, but have not visited any website to fill in any support requests... If someone is using my email address

Just received one of these things for each email I sent to CentOS list early this morning...about a 6.5 hour lag time... what gives? I bet everyone starts seeing them real soon now unless it's just my great fortune... you should consider bouncing this subscription if it's valid. Craig -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Brian Trudeau <brian.trudeau at eastek-intl.com>

Got three emails from Brian Trudeau <brian.trudeau at eastek-intl.com> to my mbox address saying With a subject of re: xxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxx Re: [CentOS] How to add System V to CentOS? Says thanks for submitting a ticket to support and gives three tickets 2DE-0B7CC3E3-050B, 34B-0B7CC3E2-829E, 1B5-0B7CC3E3-CB12 Since I had nothing to do with this, wanted to get it back to the list so that

On 02/03/2011 09:00 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > ------------------------------ > > On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 08:04:43 pm Les Mikesell wrote: >> > I think there are ways that drives can fail that would make them not be detected >> > at all - and for an autodetected raid member in a system that has been rebooted, >> > not leave much evidence of where it was

On 11/2/2017 8:04 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I'm just about to build a new server and I'm looking for recommendations on > what hardware to use. > > I'm happy with either a brand name, or building my own, but would like a > hardware RAID controller to run a pair of disks as RAID1 that is actually > compatible with and manageable through Linux. > > Any

Hi all, I was recently charged with configuring a new fairly large (24x3TB disks) fileserver for my group. I think I know mostly what I want to do with it, but I did have two questions, at least one of which is directly related to CentOS. 1) The controller node has two 90GB SSDs that I plan to use as a bootable RAID1 system disk. What is the preferred method for laying out the RAID array? I

On Sat, November 4, 2017 4:32 am, hw wrote: > Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Fri, November 3, 2017 3:36 am, hw wrote: >>> Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>> If you have not Dell server hardware my choice of [hardware] RAID >>>> cards >>>> would be: >>>> >>>> Areca >>> >>> Areca is forbiddingly expensive.

On Fri, November 3, 2017 3:36 am, hw wrote: > Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> If you have not Dell server hardware my choice of [hardware] RAID cards >> would be: >> >> Areca > > Areca is forbiddingly expensive. Yes, and it is worth every dollar it costs. All good RAID cards will be on the same price level. Those cheaper ones I will not let into our stables (don't

hi, after we switch our servers from centos-3 to centos-4 (aka. rhel-4) one of our server always crash once a week without any oops. this happneds with both the normal kernel-2.6.9-11.EL and kernel-2.6.9-11.106.unsupported. after we change the motherboard, the raid contorller and the cables too we still got it. finally we start netdump and last but not least yesterday we got a crash log and a

On 2017-11-02, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > If you have not Dell server hardware my choice of [hardware] RAID cards > would be: > > Areca > LSI (or whoever owns that line these days - Intel was the last one, I > recollect) > > With LSI beware that they have really nasty command line client, and do > not have raid watch daemon with web

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > If you have not Dell server hardware my choice of [hardware] RAID cards > would be: > > Areca Areca is forbiddingly expensive. > LSI (or whoever owns that line these days - Intel was the last one, I > recollect) > > With LSI beware that they have really nasty command line client, and do > not have raid watch daemon with web interface like late

On 29 August 2007, "Ross S. W. Walker" <rwalker at medallion.com> wrote: > Message: 39 <snip> > I wouldn't worry too much about the OS HD configuration, you are > always going to want RAID1 for the OS, whether software or hardware. > > Reason I say not to worry too much about the OS HD config is because > you are almost certainly going to put the