similar to: RFC: Element-atomic memory intrinsics

Hi Sanjoy, Responses inlined… > On May 8, 2017, at 12:49 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > [+CC Mehdi, Vedant for the auto upgrade issue] > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> **Method** >> >> Clearly we are going to have to teach

Hi, LLVM's memory intrinsics are quite useful for performing various optimizations with frequently used memory operations. Unfortunately this intrinsics are not applicable for languages with guaranteed atomicity for their memory accesses (like Java for example). In order to overcome this limitation I'm thinking about adding set of intrinsics which will execute as a series of unordered

I'm using Windows 8.1, and every time I run check-clang, I eventually end up with a bunch of hung processes. Generally this is an instance of clang.exe, a bunch of instances of FileCheck.exe, and occasionally an llc.exe and an opt.exe. Inside, the processes are all hung inside of calls to WriteFile() attempting to write to stdout. I notice some of the tests fail with output indicating that

Hi Thomas, Thanks for your kind response! Please review my backport for hs25, thanks a lot! diff -r 3544d85cfe11 src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp --- a/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp Thu Jul 19 10:00:36 2018 +0100 +++ b/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp Fri Jul 20 10:06:37 2018 +0800 @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ // Check whether val is not-null-decoded compressed oop, // i.e. will grab into the base of the heap

cmake -E cmake_progress_report llvm-3.8.0.src_bld_x86_64-rhel6.4-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles In file included from llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/include/__hash_table:19:0, from llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/src/hash.cpp:10: llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/include/cmath:310:9: error: '::signbit' has not been declared using ::signbit; ^

On 06.12.2016 09:32, Toni Mattila wrote: > Hi, > > On 05-Dec-16 20:28, Toni Mattila wrote: >> Panicing stopped when all index files where deleted. > > It happens again in same user account, so rebuilding indexes didn't > fix it. > > Here's bt full instead of just bt: > #0 0x001d4402 in __kernel_vsyscall () > No symbol table info available. > #1

Hi Thomas, Looks good. Your changes in loopPredicate.cpp does not match original changes - they miss iff->is_RangeCheck() check [1]. But in JDK8 we did not have specialized RangeCheckNode class in C2. Suggested fix should be fine fro jdk 8u. Reviewed. Please, when sending RFA ( approval request) use original 8174050 bug id. Thanks, Vladimir [1]

Hi HotSpot and LLVM developers, I am building OpenJDK8[1] with LLVM toolchain[2] for mips64el, it failed to build: /home/loongson/jdk8-mips/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp:52:35: error: ordered comparison between pointer and zero ('address' (aka 'unsigned char *') and 'int') if (Universe::narrow_oop_base() > 0) { // Implies UseCompressedOops.

Hi, The C backend in llc generates code like: static inline int llvm_fcmp_ord(double X, double Y) { return X == X && Y == Y; } static inline int llvm_fcmp_uno(double X, double Y) { return X != X || Y != Y; } First of all it generates a warning by clang and gcc (with certain flags): x.cbe.c:130: warning: comparing floating point with == or != is unsafe Now, C99 provides a macro for this

hi R-users: I want to draw three plot into one figure by layout and the script has been shown below. But I find R does not show the xlab and ylab information completely as shown the figure attached. How can I midify the script.? thank you . xxlab<-paste(cpmd," (",ro,"%)",sep=" ") yylab<-paste(rfmd," (",co,"%)",sep=" ")

Greetings! I have been building llvm-3.6.x, 3.7.1 and 3.7.2 with (glibc-2.12.1, binutils-2.24, gcc-4.9.2) almost same set if CMake flags. However while building LLVM-3.8.0 using same CMake flags I am observing projects/libcxx/include/cmath errors... ...'::signbit' has not been declared ...'::fpclassify' has not been declared ...'::isfinite' has not been declared ...

I just noticed one instance of this in the current CVS version: dovecot: Jul 18 15:25:48 Error: 5962 IMAP(mailuser): mbox sync: Expunged message reappeared in mailbox /mailhome/new/o/h/mailuser/mbox (UID 2834 < 2872) dovecot: Jul 18 15:25:48 Error: 5962 IMAP(mailuser): file mail-index-transaction.c: line 129 (mail_index_buffer_convert_to_uids): assertion failed: (*seq != 0) dovecot: Jul

Hi, I just took a look into the dovecot 2.1 sources and just saw a possible issue in array.h. This code snippet as an example: #static inline void * #array_get_modifiable_i(struct array *array, unsigned int *count_r) #{ # *count_r = array->buffer->used / array->element_size; # return buffer_get_modifiable_data(array->buffer, NULL); #} array->buffer->used and

Dear all; I'm trying to create a 2 x 3 plot (something I know like lattice can do better) using the plot function. However; I'm not sure how to make the width of the plots to be the same on each column. I guess the answer maybe obvious but I haven't been able to figure it out. I'll appreciate any suggestion. Here is the (highly inefficient) code for the first row: par(mfrow =

I've been thinking of adding an instruction, and I'm following the advice in the docs to consult the list before doing something rash. What I want to do is provide a way to identify variable names and source locations that doesn't affect the effectiveness of optimizations. This is not the same problem as supporting debug info, because I don't care about being able to look up

When attempting to save a message from the INBOX to a folder in a collection (like, .projects.dovecot), I get behavior like this (in GDB). Any clue what might be going wrong? Here's where a SIGABRT happens: 280 return array->buffer->used / array->element_size; This is the stack trace: (gdb) where #0 mail_index_map_get_ext_idx (map=0x1200c0db0, ext_id=0,

I am trying to save plots that I create using calls to windows() folowed by multiple calls to plot to place several plots on a page. I want to store the plots as variables to be able to recall them later. The documentation states: "Recorded plot histories are of class "SavedPlots". They have a print method, and a subset method. As the individual plots are of class

* Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> [2019-10-01 09:44:54 -0400]: > Let's change the example to eliminate suspects: > #include <math.h> > int is_nan(float x) { > /* > The following subclauses provide macros that are quiet (non > floating-point exception raising) > versions of the relational operators, and other comparison

Here is another crash we've been seeing recently in rc15 on Solaris 10. (gdb) bt full #0 0xff1c12a4 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #1 0xff140040 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #2 0x000786a8 in t_buffer_alloc (size=688976) at data-stack.c:346 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "file %s: line %" #3 0x00078190 in t_pop () at data-stack.c:149 frame_block = (struct

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Michael McCracken wrote: > I've been thinking of adding an instruction, and I'm following the > advice in the docs to consult the list before doing something rash. Always a good idea! :) Instead of adding an instruction, I'd suggest adding an intrinsic. You can mark intrinsics as not reading/writing to memory (see lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp for