similar to: Any places I could start contributing to?

Hello all! I mailed the list about this yesterday, but as a reply to another email [1], so maybe it got lost: could we add a "beginner" keyword to LLVM Bugzilla, so that contributors could classify bugs as relatively simple to fix? LLVM Bugzilla has keywords like "code-cleanup" and "code-quality", which describe the nature of the PR [2]. I think a

H Theodoros, David, What I am trying to figure out is how the function pointer can be updated > to point to the newly compiled version. As Dave implied, it depends on how you've set up your ORC stack. These days, the API directly responsible for this is the IndirectStubsManager (see llvm/include/llvm/ExecutionEngine/Orc/IndirectionUtils.h). If you have access to the appropriate

+Lang Ultravague answer: There are a few different Orc layers for different levels of indirection needed for different levels of substitutability. One way is to indirect every call through global function pointers - so when you want to replace the function you write the new function pointer to the global variable. I forget which layers do which kinds of indirection. - Dave On Thu, May 26, 2016

Thank you for the link and the suggestion to try master! I did so and discovered that it reproduces on master for me as well. The repro script I used (unchanged from before) and the output can be found here: https://gist.github.com/modocache/d9700166067f4a155820bc57d9bee1f3 (Note that the output looks nearly identical, but it's using clang-10 from the master branch of llvm-project.) I wonder

> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > I don't object to adding some kind of filtering option, but in general it won't help. An important goal here is to provide analysis (and other) tools to users that present this information at a higher level. The users won't, and shouldn't, know exactly what kinds of messages the tools use.

Hello, I am trying to figure out how to recompile functions multiple times during run-time with ORC JIT and I'd appreciate any help/advice. My use case is t he following: every time a function of interest (annotated) is called, profiling data are gathered. Given enough data the function is recompiled using different optimizations. This happens repeatedly until the "best"

Hello all, I'm trying to better understand the state of Mach-O support in lld. The lld docs state that "the linker supports ELF (Unix), PE/COFF (Windows), Mach-O (macOS) and WebAssembly in descending order of completeness." [1] True to that statement, I found an email on this list from Jan 2018 stating that "MachO support in lld is not really ready for real world usage. It was

Hello! (+cc Adam Nemet, since he presented on optimization remarks at LLVM Dev Mtg 2016) I have a large C++ program, which I am compiling using a sampling profile generated via perf and AutoFDO. I'd like to use this profile in order to show the hotness of each code path that is displayed in the new optimization remarks viewer tool ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq0q1hfzidg). It seems,

Hello all, It's been a month since my previous email on the topic, and since then I've done some initial work on porting the coroutines passes to the new pass manager. In total there are 6 patches -- that's a lot to review, so allow me to introduce the changes being made in each of them. # What's finished In these first 6 patches, I focused on lowering coroutine intrinsics

Adam, thanks for all the suggestions! One nice aspect of the `-Rpass` family of options is that I can filter based on what I want. If I only want to see which inlines I missed, I could use `clang -Rpass-missed="inline"`, for example. On the other hand, optimization remark YAML always include remarks from all passes (as far as I can tell), which increases the amount of time it takes

Iam a novice R-user and I have a few questions: 1) How can R import an Excell data file? 2) I have a file.s file which it seems I can open but I can not load it i.e. when I write the file name in the command line, for e.g. >file.s it gives me an error message thank you for your consideration, Theo Nicoleris

Hello all! I find that using lldb to debug LLVM libraries can be super frustrating, because a lot of LLVM classes, like the constructor for StringRef, are marked LLVM_ATTRIBUTE_ALWAYS_INLINE. So when I attempt to have lldb evaluate an expression that implicitly instantiates a StringRef, I get 'error: Couldn't lookup symbols: __ZN4llvm9StringRefC1EPKc'. As an example, most recently

Hello all, In https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq0q1hfzidg, Adam Nemet (cc'ed) describes optimization remarks and some future plans for the project. I had a few follow-up questions: 1. As an example of future work to be done, the talk mentions expanding the set of optimization passes that emit remarks. However, the Clang User Manual mentions that "optimization remarks do not really make

Vedant, Jeremy, Thanks a ton! I copied ASan's use of 'replaceDbgDeclare', think that worked! https://github.com/modocache/llvm-project/commit/afbc04e1dcba has some extremely quick and dirty changes I made (with no tests!), and a link to a Gist with the LLVM IR and DWARF produced, https://gist.github.com/modocache/6f29093ba2827946011b422ed3bd2903. There's only one kink: the spot

Hello All I am wondering is someone knows how to configure the * to work with an Ericsson MD-110 with SL60 signaling?? through a TLU76 card. What is the right configuration in the zaptel.conf ? I currently have it configured as span=3.0.0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 but it doesn't detect anything when I connect it to the PBX and no activity can be seen either in the logs or in the asterisk console.

Hi Mikhail, As Brian noted, stuff like this works better in the new pass manager. Even in the old pass manager I thought it should work though. Did you initialize the pass, via `INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass)`? Did you require it, via ` AU.addRequired<PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass>();`? Btw. May I ask what you are planning to do? Cheers, Johannes On 01/07,

I haven't fully parsed this thread (sorry!), but I wanted to briefly mention that the SafeStack & ASan passes both do something similar (I think): move local variables backed by allocas onto a separate stack. These passes use replaceDbgDeclare to rewrite dbg.declares s.t. they point into the new stack. After that, llvm presumably runs LowerDbgDeclare (usually via InstCombine), but all the

I ran into an LLVM/Clang crash when attempting to do the following: 1. Build Clang from the release/9.x branch source. 2. Use the Clang from (1) to build clangd on the release/9.x branch, with LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=On. I wrote a script to reproduce the crash: https://gist.github.com/modocache/ac366ca9673b93bb21e75d3e72162608 At the above URL, you'll find a script `repro.sh` that reproduces

Dear all, I would like to use the PostDominatorTree in ArgPromotion. I did not find an example of how to use function level analysis inside CallGraphSCCPass. I tried to follow an example of how to use function-level pass in a module pass, but I hit "llvm_unreachable" in PMDataManager::addLowerLevelRequiredPass. What would be a proper way to make PostDominatorTree available in

Hello all! (+cc Vedant Kumar, who I've been told knows a lot about UBSan!) I am trying to fix an assert that occurs when the transforms in llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines are applied to LLVM IR that has been generated with UBSan enabled -- specifically, '-fsanitize=null'. You can see an example of the assert in this 26-line C++ file here: https://godbolt.org/g/Gw9UZq Note that