Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "IMPORTANT: LLVM.org server move complete (SVN impact please read)"
2017 Jun 27
3
IMPORTANT: LLVM.org server move complete (SVN impact please read)
Hi,
After the move I have problems with svn checkout of trunk and 4.0 branch. I
get the whole bunch of different errors during checkout, including:
svn: E000054: Error running context: Connection reset by peer
svn: E000060: Operation timed out
svn: E000104: Error retrieving REPORT: Connection reset by peer
svn: E120106: ra_serf: The server sent a truncated HTTP response body.
Sometimes I'm
2017 Jun 28
2
IMPORTANT: LLVM.org server move complete (SVN impact please read)
Hi,
Got the same error, switching to https fixes the issue.
Regards,
ismail
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I haven’t gotten a lot of people mentioning this specific error, so I hope
> others will speak up.
>
> What version of the svn client are you using?
>
> Thanks,
> Tanya
>
> On Jun 27, 2017,
2017 Jun 28
2
IMPORTANT: LLVM.org server move complete (SVN impact please read)
On 06/28/2017 02:41 PM, Dmitry Babokin via llvm-dev wrote:
> I've also switched to https and it solved the problem.
>
> With http, it's still failing almost always, when I'm behind corporate
> proxy. And it does work when I'm not behind the proxy. Not sure if
> it's a problem of the proxy, or it's interplay between the proxy and
> svn server.
I've
2017 Jun 21
6
IMPORTANT: LLVM.org server move on June 24th! (SVN impact)
LLVMers,
The LLVM.org <http://llvm.org/> server which hosts SVN, GIT mirror, documentation, and the main LLVM.org <http://llvm.org/> website is moving to a new server on June 24th. As a result of the move commit access will be locked out beginning 09:00PDT on the 24th. We hope to have the move complete and commit access restored to everyone in a timely manner, however, a move of
2014 Feb 22
2
[LLVMdev] llvm.org/perf error 500
Hi Chris,
llvm.org/perf gives again error 500s. I remember you had a look the last
time. Would you mind looking again?
Also, is there something which we could do to make LNT more robust. Do
you have an idea what the last issue was about?
Thanks,
Tobias
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on polly-perf-O3-polly-scev-codegen-isl
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:08:44
2017 Jun 25
2
IMPORTANT: LLVM.org server move complete (SVN impact please read)
Thanks, fixed.
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> LLVMers,
>>
>> We have completed the move to the new server for LLVM.org. One casualty of
>> this move was that svn.llvm.org was NOT enabled
2017 Feb 27
8
Noisy benchmark results?
Hi,
I'm trying to run the benchmark suite:
http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#test-suite-quickstart
I'm doing it the lnt way, as described at:
http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html
I don't know what to expect but the results seems to be quite noisy and
unstable. E.g I've done two runs on two different commits that only
differ by a space in CODE_OWNERS.txt on my 12
2013 Jul 03
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Assert in Scope construction
Should have changed the subject line...
---
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by
The Linux Foundation
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Sergei Larin
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 12:29 PM
> To: 'Tobias Grosser'
> Cc: 'llvmdev'
2014 Jun 26
2
[LLVMdev] To test an LLVM pass
Hi,
I wrote a pass in LLVM and would like to test it on the programs in LLVM
test-suite. To be specific, I would like to get the stats upon running my
pass on these programs.
What are the commands to run my pass on the test suite?
--
Rekha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2013 Jul 05
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Assert in Scope construction
Hi Sergei,
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Should have changed the subject line...
>
> ---
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted
> by
> The Linux Foundation
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
2017 Sep 22
4
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
On 09/12/2017 10:26 PM, Gerolf Hoflehner wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev
>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote:
>>> Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael and others,
>>> *...*
>>>
>>> One thing that I’d
2017 Jun 23
2
IMPORTANT: LLVM.org server move on June 24th! (SVN impact)
> On Jun 22, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/21/2017 03:22 PM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev wrote:
>> LLVMers,
>>
>>
>>
>> TheLLVM.org <http://LLVM.org>server which hosts SVN, GIT mirror, documentation, and the mainLLVM.org <http://LLVM.org>website is moving to a new server on June 24th. As a
2014 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] Getting LNT to work with non-bash shell
I followed the LNT quickstart guide (
http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html) on my debian machine, and it
seems to have a problem running. When I consult test.log, every single
test has a section like this
# Pretend that the reference output was produced instantaneously.
> cp /home/jeremy/hardware/llvm/test-suite/instant.txt
> Output/sse.expandfft.out-nat.time
>
2017 Sep 13
0
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote:
>> Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael and others,
>>
>>> On Sep 1, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
2017 Sep 22
3
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
On 09/22/2017 12:03 AM, Mehdi AMINI wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
>
> 2017-09-21 20:59 GMT-07:00 Hal Finkel via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>:
>
>
> On 09/12/2017 10:26 PM, Gerolf Hoflehner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev
>>> <llvm-dev at
2014 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] Getting LNT to work with non-bash shell
The attached patch didn't fix it, but when I also changed another == to = a
few lines further down it seemed to work.
Jeremy
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com>
wrote:
> Jeremy Salwen <jeremysalwen at gmail.com> writes:
> > I followed the LNT quickstart guide
> > (http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html) on my debian
2015 Jan 29
2
[LLVMdev] LNT install
I followed the lnt quickstart <http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html> directions but got this diagnostic when doing the setup:
bash-3.2$ ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop
/Users/dcallahan/mysandbox/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py:284: UserWarning: The version spec\
ified requires normalization, consider using '0.4.1.dev0' instead of
2017 Jul 31
2
[LNT] new server instance http://lnt.llvm.org seems unstable
Hi,
The new LNT server instance http://lnt.llvm.org seems to fail in many cases.
Any entrance to a 'Run page' (e.g. http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/62475) and lately
also many perf bots result submissions (e.g. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt-perf/builds/2262/steps/test-suite/logs/stdio ) fails with:
"500 Internal Server Error".
Any ideas?
Thanks,
2017 Jul 31
2
Internal server error when submitting LNT to lnt.llvm.org
Dear all,
I recently started to see internal server errors when submitting perf
results to lnt.llvm.org
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/builds/1154/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio
nt
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/tests/nt/build/sample-0/report.simple.csv
2017 Jul 31
1
[LNT] new server instance http://lnt.llvm.org seems unstable
The run page problem were triggered by one of my commits (sorry) and should be mitigated now, see the thread at http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html>
I don't know about the submission problems, could they just an occasional network problem or are they a common phenomenon? Chris did some