similar to: simplify CFG Pass in llvm

Hi, I have been trying to move some instructions between basic blocks , After looking at the API , I found llvm::Instruction::clone() but there is no result value for this. For example- source Basic block : continuation: ; preds = %else, %then %iftmp = phi i32 [ 5, %then ], [ 9, %else ] store i32 %iftmp, i32* %datasize ; 3 instructions below

This [1] might worth reading, Malhar. [1] http://llvm.org/docs/HowToSetUpLLVMStyleRTTI.html 2017-06-10 4:12 GMT+08:00 Tim Northover via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > On 9 June 2017 at 12:03, Jajoo, Malhar via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Is there some way around this ( without suggesting a change to my entire > AST ) ? > > LLVM

Hi, Just had a simple question , The use-def and def-use chains provided by llvm::Value class , would they work for IR that has not been optimized by the "mem2reg" pass ? ( ie, IR code that contains memory interactions and is not in SSA form yet ) Thanks, Malhar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 9 June 2017 at 15:29, Jajoo, Malhar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Thanks for that , I have read the documentation on this , but I would like to know > if it would be the right thing to do , ie , changing the enum within llvm::Type Well, I find the idea of a non-canonical DummyType slightly disturbing (I don't think it's something we'd ever support

Hi, I was wondering how I can print out the result of some arithmetic on 128 bit integers. After having a look at the API , it seems it is possible to get the integer value from the "ConstantInt::getSextValue() " but the return value is only a int64_t. I wish to print it on the console output and printing as a string or decimal ( using C standard library printf ) My Question :

Hi, I was wondering if it was possible to create a Dummy Type by subclassing LLVM Type. I do not want to create a new type or even do much with this dummy type , all I need is a placeholder type until I generate IR. I want to use this approach as most of my AST is already configured to accept a Type* and not a DummyType* ( which is my own class ) I explored this a bit and did manage to

Hi everyone, I just had a question - I am aware that LLVM supports it's own form of RTTI ( using dyn_cast<>() ,etc) but I wish to use C++ RTTI currently. I have tried building with "cmake -G "Unix Makefiles" -LLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON" but that doesnt seem to remove the "fno-rtti" flag from llvm-config and I still get an error when I try using

Hi, I was trying to print out a 128 bit result at runtime using a call to printf in LLVM. I am able to print 32 uptil 64 bit integers using the format string "%d" in printf . Please see the code in red below , as I am having a bit difficulty in trying to print the 128 bit value computed at runtime. The code in red is never executed since the value may never be casted to a

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 1:28 PM Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 12:46 PM Malhar Thakkar <cs13b1031 at iith.ac.in> > wrote: > >> Thank you so much for your response. >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>

Dear all, I just created this revision <https://reviews.llvm.org/D34937> but I did not receive any email for it even though it says 'Automatically Subscribed' on the right. Also, even my profile shows no trace of the aforementioned revision. It shows that my last activity was on 24th May. Additionally, just to verify that I am not receiving any emails from Phabricator, I logged

Thank you so much for your response. On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:36 AM Malhar Thakkar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I have a piece of code (written in LLVM 2.8) which uses profiling results >> produced by ProfileInfo.

Hi all, I'm trying to implement a floating-point 'min' and 'max' operation using select. For 'min' I get the expected x86 assembly minss instruction, but for 'max' I get a branch instead of maxss. The corresponding C syntax code looks like this: float z = (x > y) ? x : y; Any clues? Could someone maybe explain to me the basics of

instcombine can handle certain orders of "icmp"s that are "or"ed together: x != 5 OR x > 10 OR x == 8 becomes.. x != 5 OR x == 8 becomes.. x != 5 However, a different ordering prevents the simplification: x == 8 OR x > 10 OR x != 5 becomes.. %or.eq8.gt10 OR x != 5 and that can't be simplified because we now have an "or" OR "icmp". What would I

Hi All, I was wondering if there is an optimisation pass that moves a stack allocated array, initialised with constant values, to a global constant array. And if there is such a pass, what requirements are there for it to operate? My optimised IR is below. As you can see an array of 5 integers is created with alloca, then each element is stored to in turn. It would be nice if this array was

Hey all, I have a piece of code (written in LLVM 2.8) which uses profiling results produced by ProfileInfo. It essentially computes the number of iterations performed by a loop from the profiling information available. The code snippet in my pass looks something like this. BasicBlock *header = loop->getHeader(); ProfileInfo &pi = getAnalysis< ProfileInfo >(); for(pred_iterator

Here's an initial stab, but I'm not too happy about the temporarily adding new instructions then removing it because returning it will have it added back in to replace other uses. I also added a couple test cases pass with the new InstructionCombining changes (the old code only passes one of the added tests). Also, this change exposes some simplification for

Hi, all I'd like to write a code that can build different codes based on LLVM version. Like code snippets in the below. #ifdef __LLVM_29__ PHINode *PN = Builder.CreatePHI (Type::getDoubleTy(getGlobalContext()), 2, "iftmp"); #elif __LLVM_28__ PHINode *PN = Builder.CreatePHI (Type::getDoubleTy(getGlobalContext()), "iftmp"); #else assert ("wrong

Hello, I'm doing some Def/Use analysis, and I'm hung up on one tricky spot. The BB in question is attached. Ignore the red. The issue is that '%13 = load...' instruction does not show up as a Use for the '%scevgep25' definition, and I feel like it should. Instead, it shows up as a Use for '%iftmp.55.0 = select...', though Operand(0) for this '%13 =

Dear All, I have, in an LLVM bitcode program, the following phi node: %iftmp.225.0 = phi i8* [ getelementptr ([10 x i8]* @.str12597431, i32 0, i32 0), %bb114 ], [ getelementptr ([10 x i8]* @.str1258, i32 0, i32 0), %bb111 ], [ getelementptr ([10 x i8]* @.str1258, i32 0, i32 0), %bb111 ] This phi instruction has two arguments for the same incoming basic block. The only reason why it passes

Hello everyone, In the file *lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp*, I would like to obtain an MCInst corresponding to its MachineInstr. Can anyone tell me a way to do that? If that is not possible, then, I would like to know if a given MachineInstr is an *lea *instruction and I would like to know if the symbol involved with this lea instruction is a jump-table. For instance, given a