similar to: building llvm_Rel400 on Scientific Linux (RHEL) 7.3 x86_64

On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 16:04:57 -0700 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > I think you should be able to fix it by changing the > compiler-rt/lib/xray/test/CMakeLists.txt. If you find the > "add_compiler_rt_test" call and move "-lstdc++" to the end, just after > "-lrt" it should work. Thanks, Tim. I don't see "-lrt":

Hi Dean, Wondering if you've seen anything like this: /usr/local/google/home/blaikie/dev/llvm/build/clang/debug/split/notypes/nostandalone/projects/compiler-rt/lib/xray/tests/unit && /usr/local/google/home/blaikie/dev/llvm/build/clang/debug/split/notypes/nostandalone/./bin/clang fdr_logging_test.cc.x86_64.o xray_unit_test_main.cc.x86_64.o gtest-all.cc.x86_64.o -o

Hi all, I'm not sure whether this is the right mailing list to post to (I didn't find any other related ones), but I'm having trouble compiling the GCC frontend for LLVM. I can successfully compile LLVM using CMake, but am having compiler errors when doing LLVM-GCC: /usr/bin/llvm-g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros

Hello, (cc:llvmdev Keeping on the list to get more eyes on the problem and for archival purposes). Configure will be re-run, yes. LLVM includes some tools which need to be built for the host, even when cross compiling (e.g., tblgen). In a cross-build, these are built in the BuiltTools directory and that's where you're seeing configure being re-run. >From the below snippet it appears

[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to this ML ] Original posting from [1]... <QUOTE> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:13:05PM +0100, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev wrote: > Build-time increased approx. 1h from 2 to 3 hours when using CMAKE > instead of CONFIGURE/MAKE (logs deleted for LLVM v3.8.0rc2). > Building always done with one single parallel-compile-jobs. > When using CMAKE

Hello, Has anyone managed to successfully compile the latest 3.13.2 under FreeBSD 11.1? ./autogen.sh and ./configure seem to work but make fails: Making all in src CC glfs.lo cc: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-rdynamic' [-Wunused-command-line-argument] cc: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-rdynamic' [-Wunused-command-line-argument] fatal

On 05/07/2018 04:29 AM, Roman Serbski wrote: > Hello, > > Has anyone managed to successfully compile the latest 3.13.2 under > FreeBSD 11.1? ./autogen.sh and ./configure seem to work but make > fails: See https://review.gluster.org/19974 3.13 reached EOL with 4.0. There will be a fix posted for 4.0 soon. In the mean time I believe your specific problem with 3.13.2 should be

On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to > copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ > build_llvm) into the top-level directory. Why not: $ RC_ARCHS="x86" make echo Apple Build. Apple Build. $ make echo Standard Build Standard Build $ cat Makefile ifneq

On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Valentin Radu wrote: > >> checking for armv7-apple-darwin-clang... no >> checking for armv7-apple-darwin-llvm-gcc... no >> checking for armv7-apple-darwin-gcc... no > > It's because you don't have a compiler around that targets arm by default. Exactly right. You

On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ >> build_llvm) into the top-level directory. > > Why not: > > $ RC_ARCHS="x86" make > echo Apple Build.

Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/build_llvm) into the top-level directory. This is generally a PITA inside of Apple. (I'll spare you the gory details. :-) I'd like to fix this for Apple, and I want to avoid compromising anybody else's build system. I've never used

On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >>> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >>> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ >>> build_llvm) into the top-level directory.

Hallo all, I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag. It didn't work as I almost expected. So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore? If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that cmake option also removed?

Ok, I have just found the cause of the error messages I am getting, and it now makes sense to me why the 'normal' build works fine on Windows, Linux and OS X, and why my personal build works on Linux and OS X, but not on Windows. However, I still don't understand why I am getting the error messages I am getting. Anyway, it has to do with wanting to export some classes and function,

All, I'm seeing duplication of DICompileUnits in a pass that worked in 3.8. I assume I'm doing something wrong. Would someone be willing to point me in the right direction? The below minimized pass reproduces my issue in 4.0 with the following error: DICompileUnit not listed in llvm.dbg.cu !1707 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C_plus_plus, file: !1, producer: "clang

> On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:55 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I switched from "configure and make" to "cmake" build-system and > wanted to speedup my build. > > In my build-script I use... > > CMAKE_JOBS="1" > ##CMAKE_JOBS=$(($(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)+1)) >

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:34 PM Dean Michael Berris <dean.berris at gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 Mar 2017, at 15:39, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017, 4:10 PM Dean Michael Berris <dean.berris at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On 9 Mar 2017, at 09:32, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at

Thank you. What I need to do to address this? Open an issue on bugs.llvm.org? I'm not sure what the fix needs to be in the cloner. On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > There have in the past been bugs in the cloner involving duplicate > DICompileUnits (see e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D29240), this one may > need a similar fix.

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:28 PM Tim Shen <timshen at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:49 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > So I stumbled across an issue that I think is a bit fundamental: > > The xray runtime uses the C++ standard library. > > This seems like a problem because whatever C++ standard library is used to > compile the

On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > >> >> On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: >> >>> On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >>>> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >>>> copy two files