Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged"
2017 Jul 31
3
[cfe-dev] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:
> On 27 Jul 2017, at 00:41, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged.
>>
>> Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know if
>> there are any issues.
>
> Built and tested rc1. Test failures on
2017 Jul 31
0
[cfe-dev] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged
On 31 Jul 2017, at 19:26, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:
>> On 27 Jul 2017, at 00:41, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged.
>>>
>>> Please build, test and upload binaries
2018 Jun 04
5
6.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Hi,
The 6.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged. Testers may begin testing and
reporting results.
-Tom
2018 Apr 26
7
6.0.1-rc1 has been tagged
Hi,
I've just tagged the 6.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may begin testing and uploading
binaries. Also, any tester who has not tested 5.0.2-rc1 and would like to do
so please try to do this before Friday, because I would like to tag 5.0.2-final then.
As a reminder to users and developers, May 18 is the deadline for submitting
merge requests for 6.0.1, so there is still time to get bug fixes
2018 Feb 09
2
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:
> On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in
>> a better state now.
>>
>> 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506.
>>
>>
2018 Feb 09
0
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:
>> On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in
2017 Nov 08
3
[RFC] ASan: patches to support 32-byte shadow granularity
I've finished my initial set of patches to make 32-byte shadow
granularity work on x86. Here is a summary of the changes from last
week:
- As discussed, I added a full redzone after every stack variable.
- We discussed adding a -fsanitize-address-granularity=N flag, but I
found the following existing flag has been sufficient for my
purposes: -asan-mapping-scale N. If anyone thinks I
2016 Jan 26
2
Problems with test on ppc
Bill,
For some reason the llvm-symbolizer tests fail on ppc:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux/builds/182/steps/ninja%20check%201/logs/stdio
because it can't be started:
/home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-test/clang-ppc64le/stage1/./bin/llvm-symbolizer:
/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by
2017 Oct 31
1
[RFC] ASan: patches to support 32-byte shadow granularity
+ more asan folks, please CC them to the code reviews.
Also please make sure llvm-commits is CC-ed (cfe-commits for clang changes)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Walter Lee <waltl at google.com> wrote:
> I've prepared a preliminary set of patches that makes ASan work with
> 32-byte shadow granularity, and I would like to get some feedback on
> those patches as well as my
2015 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] [3.7 Release] RC2 has been tagged, Testing Phase II begins
On Friday, July 31, 2015 07:50 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote:
> Dear testers,
>
> 3.7.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test, build binaries, upload to the
> sftp, and report results to this thread.
LNT is looking good on Ubuntu 14.04 x64, uploaded:
clang+llvm-3.7.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz
The errors reported during build are:
Failing Tests (17):
2014 Oct 09
4
[LLVMdev] Remaining Compiler-RT failures in ARM
Folks,
As of this run:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-full/builds/746
There are three classes of failures that need fixing before we get the
bot green:
1. AddressSanitizer.BuiltinLongJmpTest Unit Test
Two configurations fail:
* Asan-arm-inline-Test
* Asan-arm-with-calls-Test
I wonder what's the best way to run it individually and reduce the
error. I'm not
2015 Jul 30
8
[LLVMdev] [3.7 Release] RC2 has been tagged, Testing Phase II begins
Dear testers,
3.7.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test, build binaries, upload to the
sftp, and report results to this thread.
A lot of fixes have been applied since rc1, both to the build script
and the code in general, so hopefully it will be less bumpy this time.
>From this point, I will no longer accept merge requests to finish
existing features; it's now bug-fixes only.
Thanks again
2014 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] UBSAN - Test failures
Hi Evgeniy,
So, to XFAIL some UBSAN failues, I found an issue:
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer-AddressSanitizer :: TestCases/TypeCheck/vptr.cpp
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer-Standalone :: TestCases/Misc/missing_return.cpp
These two tests fail on that configuration, but pass when reversed.
So, if I XFAIL: armv7l..., I get the following error:
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer-AddressSanitizer ::
2015 Jul 16
23
[LLVMdev] [3.7 Release] RC1 has been tagged, Testing Phase I begins
Dear testers,
3.7.0-rc1 was just tagged; please start your testing engines :-)
Upload binaries to the sftp and report your results to this thread.
I'm sorry for the delay between branching and tagging. The changes to
the release script took a little longer than I hoped.
Thanks for helping with the release, and do let me know of any issues,
questions, etc.
The tracking bug for release
2015 Nov 12
4
Fwd: asan for allocas on powerpc64
(Resending with the correct mailing list address.)
Hi,
Currently test/asan/TestCases/alloca_vla_interact.cc is XFAILed for
powerpc64. I've had a look at why it doesn't work. I think the only
problem is in the call to __asan_allocas_unpoison that is inserted at
the end of the "for" loop (just before a stackrestore instruction).
The call function is created something like this
2019 Dec 14
5
LLVM 9.0.1-rc3 has been tagged
Hi,
I've just tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc3. Testers can begin testing and uploading
binaries. This will be the last release candidate unless there is a
major problem. I'm planning to tag the final release on Dec 19.
-Tom
2019 Sep 13
4
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 is here
Hello everyone,
9.0.0-rc5 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371837. In
the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5.
Source code and docs are available at
https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc5 Binaries will be added as they
become available.
There is only a single change from rc4 to rc5. Once more, the hope is
that this will be the last release candidate and that we can
2015 Nov 17
3
asan for allocas on powerpc64
Hi!
Sorry for delay, just returned from vacation.
On 12/11/15 23:44, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev wrote:
> +Maxim and Yuri, as I think this is their code.
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com
> <mailto:jay.foad at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> (Resending with the correct mailing list address.)
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently
2019 Sep 10
15
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here
Hello again,
9.0.0-rc4 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371490. In
the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4.
Source code and docs are available at
https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc4 Binaries will be added as they
become available.
There are not a lot of changes from rc3 to rc4, and there are again no
open release blockers, so I'm hoping this will be the last
2019 Nov 23
5
LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 Release has been tagged
Hi,
I've tagged the LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload
binaries. I've also updated the test-release.sh script to pull from GitHub
instead of SVN, if you run into any issues with the new script, let me know.
-Tom