similar to: LLVM (Cool/Warm) DOT Printers for Profiling

Hello, is there a good way to determine that the instruction is a vector instruction? Or the only way like it's size is multiple of the operands size? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170829/bbe6213b/attachment.html>

> On Jul 14, 2017, at 10:22 AM, Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On Jul 14, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Brian

Ok, thank you. I have also one question about getelementptr. In different versions of clang I see that sometimes array[i][i] is preceded by two getelementptr instructions and sometimes only by one - with an already complex index. 2017-09-01 12:50 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>: > On 1 Sep 2017, at 11:44, Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: keita abdoul-kader <abdoulk.keita at gmail.com> Date: Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:01 PM Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Seattle/King County based meetup To: Sam Elliott <ashe2 at cs.washington.edu> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Sam Elliott <ashe2 at cs.washington.edu> wrote: > I would be interested. I'm at UW, doing a PhD. > >

Hi We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the CentOS one is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this reasonable and correct? Any ideas why would there be such a discrepancy if they are built from the same (or very similar) source? Regards Anthony Caetano ** the md5sum checks out, and RHN lists the size as 3,532 MB *** CentOS-5.5-x86_64-bin-DVD-1of2.iso +

Hi Hal, Because my function merging strategy is able to merge any two function, allowing for different CFGs, different parameters, etc. I am unable to use just a simple hash value to compare whether or not two functions are similar. Therefore, the idea is to have an infrastructure which allows me to compare whether or not two functions are similar without having traverse the two function

Ugh, sorry for the formatting. Not sure what happened when it sent through the list. Trying again Blessings, Rob Archibald CTO, EndFirst LLC rob at robarchibald.com -----Original Message----- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Rob Archibald Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 3:55 PM To: 'Wolfgang Hennerbichler'; dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: RE: One way

Hi, I'm running openssh-2.3.0p1 under Tru64 4.0. I've got the sources and built it whithout additional options. The `problem' happens when a login from a non-existing user is attempted: $ ssh bogus at foo.com Connection closed by foo.com It doesn't even ask the password. So anyone can test whether this host has a user called bogus. I'm not sure whether this is a bug, but I

So, even with a particular user only connecting to one node in the pair, you still see the issue? I'm not seeing that in my setup. I only see it when concurrently connecting the same user to two different nodes in the pair. Blessings, Rob Archibald CTO, EndFirst LLC rob at robarchibald.com > On Mar 24, 2017, at 12:50 AM, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote: > >

Hi everyone, I'm currently working on a new function merging optimization that is more general than the current LLVM function merging optimization that works only on identical functions. I would like to know if the community has any interest in having a more powerful function merging optimization. ---- More Details ---- Up until now, I have been focusing on the quality of the code

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 5:04 AM, ORiordan, Martin <martin.oriordan at intel.com > wrote: > Thanks Sean and Silva. > > > > I guess what I was seeking was a URL that I could point (non-compiler) > people at, but I guess no such reference exists. What I can do if > reference bot the source manager and use ‘-mllvm -debug-pass=Structure’ > for each optimisation level,

Hi dovecot users, I?ve found the -R parameter for dsync. Does this enable one-way syncing if enabled on the slave in replication_dsync_parameters? The documentation doesn?t mention much what happens if I enable this on the ?replciation slave?. Before you ask: Two way synchronisation causes issues in my installation (see the unanswered thread here:

I've configured samba 3.0.4 with LDAP as the backend. I've configured samba to use the ldap directory, which works fine, my problem is when I add two two servers into the smb.conf file it sees the first(master) ldap server, but if I bring that server down it takes forever for it to switch to the slave ldap server. If I place just a single ldap server, master or slave, into the

OS = RHEL 5 samba version 3.0.33-3.29 openldap 2.3 is it possible to have linux users stored in an ldap directory and still use the passdb backend = smbpasswd. I have an existing smbpasswd password db and an existing set of linux users I have migrated the linux users to LDAP and authenticating successfully until I have time to get all samba credentials migrated to ldap i still need use the

We are in the process of implementing realtime voicemail. I was wanting to "stress-test" the system to see if or when it would fall over. Is it possible to use sipp to create say 250 calls, each of which leaves a message in the voicemail ? My dialplan is currently [default] exten => stress,1,Answer() exten => stress,2(vm),Voicemail(7777|su) exten => stress,3,Hangup()

OS = RHEL 5 samba version 3.4.15 OpenLdap 2.3.43 Hi I am struggling with this problem at the very end of deploying a samba/ldap solution (currently not doing an domain stuff) . It all seems to working except that when I modify a user by adding the user to a new group (unix group) this change is not reflected in samba shares. the opposite is also true. for example the directory listing is

Hi list, I have a server running a simple hfs isdn card running with chan_misdn. the problem is, I can't get asterisk to pick up the phone, outgoing calls work fine. when running asterisk with -vvvvvvvvvvvc I get the following "log" when I try to dial the isdn server. P[ 1] * Starting Ast ctx:kpn-in dad:0594643637 oad:0878722291 with 's' extension P[ 1] MGMT: SSTATUS:

Hi guys: After a power outage, one machine network does not enter the field more. The machine is a Windows 7 Professional. I have a Samba 4 server as the PDC. Every time I try to join in the Domain this machine is a user error and password on your computer, however they are correct. I have 15 machines in the field and only this machine with this problem. Already excludes account Samba Server

Please help me?! I am at my wits end. Or is it: a twisty maze of little passages : N a little maze of twisty passages : N (etc) but I keep missing my batteries! <and my lantern is going dim...> [sorry for the OLD reference!] Was: Help-w2k pro no longer "trusted" in 2.2.3 pdc ------------------Here is the pre-amble and request?!---------------- Here's my

With our without puppet. We are looking at setting up DR nodes with some draft ideas. We use puppet against a git repository (with ppg) instead of against a puppet server. Nodes are actually VMs. Configuration ideas: - a filesystem-level flag that indicates that the node is running as standby spare, to use as conditional in bash/python scripts as well as in puppet - some services