similar to: Error while accessing reviews.llvm.org

- Please do not add any more uses of the LiveVariables pass! It is deprecated and only kept around for one last pass that isn't converted. All new code should use LiveIntervalAnalysis! - Kill flags are optional: If they are present they must be correct, but it is legal to have a value die without having a kill flag on the operand. So often a simple fix is to clear out the kill flags from

Hello Devs, I am getting following error while connecting to review server. " A Troublesome Encounter! Woe! This request had its journey cut short by unexpected circumstances (Can Not Connect to MySQL)" Is anyone else facing this? Thanks [image: Inline image 1] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Other suggestions 1/ Write a separate MI pass to split the macro MI which was generated earlier as a result of ISel to multiple MIs. 2/ Take the decision of splitting later in the pipeling during MC lowering. Decision about when you need to split should be driven by your intent to do any further processing over constituent instruction. ~ Jatin On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Jatin Bhateja

Guys, Do we have any LLVM social for India/Asia. Wonderful concept to meet fellow community members and have technical discussion. Cheers, Jatin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180503/ce896912/attachment.html>

Seems llvm cannot pass metadata to MachineInstr, or setting operand description in class Instruction and pass to class MachineInstr. Is it a good idea to extend llvm kernel structure to having this feature? Jonathan > On Nov 27, 2017, at 9:01 PM, Jatin Bhateja <jatin.bhateja at gmail.com> wrote: > > SelectionDAGBuilder contained within SelectionDAGISel has a map (NodeMap) b/w

No but we should think of arranging one. On Thu, May 3, 2018, 8:27 PM Jatin Bhateja via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Guys, > > Do we have any LLVM social for India/Asia. > > Wonderful concept to meet fellow community members and have technical > discussion. > > Cheers, > Jatin > _______________________________________________ > LLVM

Hello Devs, Machine Instruction verifier pass always validates Live variable info associated with MachineInstr along with other checks. Please consider following scenario (w.r.t bugZilla 32583) 1/ MachineCSE pass may prohibit optimising out a common sub-expression for instruction using physical registers by looking at the LiveIn info of successor basic blocks. 2/ Which means we need Live

Hi Nagaraju, Few suggestions split this into following steps. 1/ DAG Legalization : Custom lower the instruction (branch in your case) appropriately in legalization to target specific DAG nodes and glue the nodes together which you want scheduler should schedule together. 2/ Instruction Selection : Define patterns to match the custom DAG nodes. Thus actual decision of creating multiple

Hi All, I am working on a target which requires to generated two instructions for a single branch instruction. ex: imm 1 br r4,0xabcd branch address is 0x1abcd, imm has the upper 16 bits and br has lower 16 bits. Can anyone let me know how to write these kind of patterns in the InstrInfo.td file. Thanks in Advance, Nagaraju

I am working on llvm gpu backend. The instruction metadata can only get in IR (class instruction). In DAG stage, the instructions are reordered, so I cannot map the metadata to correct instruction if I cannot access instruction from DAG or MachineInstr structure. > On Nov 26, 2017, at 11:02 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > > It might be a more useful to know what

Hi Hashim, Scalar evolution determines evolution of scalar in terms of expression chain driving it. Try dumping the detailed log using opt -analyze -scalar-evolution <.ll> -S , and look for LoopDispositions corresponding to different expression which shows variance characteristics of a particular expression w.r.t loop i.e. [computable/variant/invariant]. Thanks On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at

Hi, I am using Scalar Evolution to extract access expressions (for load and store instructions) in terms of the loop induction variables. I observe that the Scalar Evolution analysis is returning more expressions than I expect - including ones that are not defined in terms of the loop induction variable. For instance in the following code: for(unsigned long int bid = 0; bid < no_of_queries;

Dear gluster experts, We're running glusterfs 3.3 and we have met file permission probelems after gluster volume rebalance. Files got stick permissions T--------- after rebalance which break our client normal fops unexpectedly. Any one known this issue? Thank you for your help. -- ??? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Everyone; Why does running "puppet resource" require root/sudo access? Is it supposed to be this way or do I have a permissions issue? I installed using the gzip files... Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this

I still need the output to match my requiremnt in my original post. With decision rules "clusters" and probability attached to them. The examples are sort of similar. You just provided links to general info about trees. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone<div> </div><div> </div><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message

@James I am not sure in IRC if we can retrieve back the older messages. So consider Slack as suggestion only. *Vivek Pandya* On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 6:29 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > Hmm. But we already use IRC, we don't already use Slack (as a community). > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 at 10:57, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: >

Tjats great that you are familiar and thanks for responding. Have you ever done what I am referring to? I have alteady spent time going through links and tutorials about decision trees and random forrests and have even used them both before. Mike On Apr 13, 2016 5:32 PM, "Sarah Goslee" <sarah.goslee at gmail.com> wrote: It sounds like you want classification or regression trees.

In my spec_helper, I want to load yaml file to a variable, and then be able to use that in my tests. spec_helper.rb: RSpec.configure do |config| end config = YAML::Load(......) some_spec.rb describe ''blah'' do it "should be...." do MyClass.new( config[''test''] ) end end How can I do this? -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi, surely I''m missing something... but what!? in my spec I''ve User.should_receive(:find).with("1").and_return(@user) and in my controller User.find(params[:id]) green light... correct... but if I change my controller using another method, for example first: User.first or even User.all I get green light too... I was expecting an error like expected: 1 time

Possibly protobuf or capn proto would be much more clean alternatives to json. I was working with interpreting instruction semantics a while back, and you shouldn't have to write a parser to get the data structure back into coherent form, you can get what you want automatically and have the structure isolated into a common schema. On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Stephen Cross <scross at