Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[RFC] Value Range Based Optimization Opportunity in LLVM"
2020 Feb 24
5
IBM C/C++ and Fortran compilers to adopt LLVM open source infrastructure
<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:9pt" ><div dir="ltr" >Hi all,</div>
<div dir="ltr" >I'm very excited to be able to share this with everyone. </div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" >IBM announced this
2016 Apr 26
3
PPC little endian?
Hi,
I am wondering why we dont support PPC32 LE?
Here is the output of llvm-mc --version, in which only PPC32, PPC64 &
PPC64LE are supported.
$ llvm-mc --version
LLVM (http://llvm.org/):
LLVM version 3.6.2
Optimized build with assertions.
Built Aug 2 2015 (11:39:46).
Default target: x86_64-apple-darwin15.4.0
Host CPU: core-avx2
Registered Targets:
aarch64 - AArch64
2015 Apr 10
4
[LLVMdev] Optimization on Atomics (and the OpenMP memory model)
Hi everyone,
The OpenMP standards committee has begun work to formalize their memory model, and define its relationship to the C/C++ memory models. A questionnaire has been put together (pasted below), and I'd like everyone's help in composing detailed answers to inform their decision-making process. While our OpenMP support is still in active development, many of these questions apply
2018 Oct 28
2
libuv bug ??
EPEL package but I think there's a packaging bug, thought I would ask here.
Trying to build something that requires libuv-devel - it finds the .so but
can't determine version.
header files are in /usr/include/uv however the pkgconfig file specifies
/usr/include as the include directory.
The pkgconfig file also has the version so I'm not sure why the make file
can't determine
2012 Jan 26
1
Error in ifelse(append, "a", "w") : , (list) object cannot be coerced to type 'logical'
Hello
I will appreciate your help with the following.
Running a script in R 2.14.1 under windows vista I get the following error
message:
Error in ifelse(append, "a", "w") :
(list) object cannot be coerced to type 'logical'
However, the very same script runs perfectly well under Ubuntu.
My understanding is that this type of error is associated to
2007 Dec 13
2
use ggplot in a function to which a column name is given
Hi everyone, Hi ggplot users in particular,
ggplot makes it very easy to plot things given their names when you
use it interactively (and therefore can provide the names of the
columns).
qplot(x,foo,data=A) where A has columns (x,y,foo,bar) for example
but I would like to use this from inside a function to which the name
of the column is given. I cannot find an elegant way to make this
2012 May 23
1
procrustes (vegan) plot of residual differences
Hello
This is a simple question but I couldn't google an answer.
In the procrustes function of the vegan package, one uses
plot(procrustes_object, kind=2) to obtain a plot of the residual
differences. For instance:
data(varespec)
vare.dist <- vegdist(wisconsin(varespec))
library(MASS)
mds.null <- isoMDS(vare.dist, tol=1e-7)
mds.alt <- isoMDS(vare.dist,
2020 Jul 07
1
[PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
On 07.07.20 10:44, Pierre Morel wrote:
> S390, protecting the guest memory against unauthorized host access
> needs to enforce VIRTIO I/O device protection through the use of
> VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 and VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel at linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25
2018 Jun 04
2
[RFC V2] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 18:57 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > - First qemu doesn't know that the guest will switch to "secure mode"
> > in advance. There is no difference between a normal and a secure
> > partition until the partition does the magic UV call to "enter secure
> > mode" and qemu doesn't see any of it. So who can set the flag here
2020 Jul 07
4
[PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:44:37 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> S390, protecting the guest memory against unauthorized host access
> needs to enforce VIRTIO I/O device protection through the use of
> VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 and VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM.
Hm... what about:
"If protected virtualization is active on s390, the virtio queues are
not accessible to the
2020 Jul 07
4
[PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:44:37 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> S390, protecting the guest memory against unauthorized host access
> needs to enforce VIRTIO I/O device protection through the use of
> VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 and VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM.
Hm... what about:
"If protected virtualization is active on s390, the virtio queues are
not accessible to the
2012 Jan 26
2
extracting from data.frames for survival analysis
Hi,
I have a data frame:
> class(B27.vec)
[1] "data.frame"
> head(B27.vec)
AGE Gend B27 AgeOn DD uveitis psoriasis IBD CD UC InI BASDAI BASFI Smok UV
1 57 1 1 19 38 2 1 1 1 1 1 5.40 8.08 NA 1
2 35 1 1 33 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1.69 2.28 NA 1
3 49 2 1 40 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 8.30 9.40 NA
2016 Feb 22
4
[PPC] Linker fails on -fstack-protector
I found a bit weird to use address space for this, since the offset of
getting stack_guard in TCB is, unfortunately, negative:
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/rs6000/linux64.h#L610
In my understanding an address space is referring to a segment register
(-on powerpc 32bit; or SLB entry on powerpc 64bit?) with a non-negative
offset value, so that it's actually accessing
2012 May 22
4
“For” calculation is so slow
Dear All,
The function I wrote can run well with the small data, but with the large
data, the function runs very very slowly. How can I correct it? Thank you
very much. My function as below:
a<-c(1:240)
b<-c(1:240)
l=function(a,b){
v=0
u=0
uv=0
v[1]=0
u[1]=0
uv[1]=0
for (i in 1:(length(s)-1)){
v[i]<-((gx[[i]][b,(gx[[i]][a,1]+1)])-(gx[[i]][a,gx[[i]][a,1]+1]))/(gx[[i]][a,gx[[i]][a,1]+1])
2018 Aug 10
2
dying on osx
$ grep dove /etc/passwd /etc/group
/etc/passwd:_dovecot:*:214:6:Dovecot Administrator:/var/empty:/usr/bin/false
/etc/passwd:_dovenull:*:227:227:Dovecot
Authentication:/var/empty:/usr/bin/false
/etc/group:certusers:*:29:root,_jabber,_postfix,_cyrus,_calendar,_dovecot
/etc/group:_dovenull:*:227:
I'm trying to build on osx so I can try to do some debugging. The
INSTALL.md says to do:
$ more
2018 Aug 10
1
dying on osx
OSX 10.13.6 High Sierra, dovecot 2.3.2.1
dovecot starts up and runs but dies as soon as my mail client makes a
request with log and config below.
And advice appreciated.
Thanks
Mike
20180810-083730 auth: Debug: auth client connected (pid=77432)
20180810-083730 auth: Debug: client in: AUTH??? 1??? PLAIN
service=imap??? secured??? session=xo1p2BRzZNd/AAAB lip=127.0.0.1???
rip=127.0.0.1???
2018 Aug 10
1
dying on osx
Maybe an old problem that has resurfaced???
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8773
Mike
On 8/10/18 10:54, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> I have to see if this is reproducible outside mac.
>
>
>
> ---
> Aki Tuomi
> Dovecot oy
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Mike Makuch <1mikemakuch at gmail.com>
> Date: 10/08/2018 18:46 (GMT+02:00)
> To:
2009 Oct 05
2
Parsing Files in R (USGS StreamFlow data)
http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?format=rdb&period=7&site_no=021973269
I would like to be able to parse this file up:
I can do this
x <- read.table("http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?format=rdb&period=7&site_no=021973269",
skip=26)
but If I add another gauge to this
x <-
2014 Nov 28
2
[RESEND PATCH nouveau 3/3] volt: add support for GK20A
Hello Vince,
One minor question inline.
Op 28-11-14 om 12:13 schreef Vince Hsu:
> The voltage value are calculated by the hardware characterized
> result.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com>
> ---
>
> Resend this patch with the fuse change and proper patch prefix
> per Thierry's request.
>
> drm/Kbuild | 1 +
>
2020 Jul 07
5
[PATCH v4 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
I changed the patch subject to reflect the content, becoming more
general.
1) I removed the ack from Christian and Jason even far as
I understand they gave it for the functionality more than for the
implementation.
@Jason, @Christian, please can I get back your acked-by with these changes?
2) previous patch had another name:
[PATCH v3 0/1] s390: virtio: let arch choose to