similar to: Is anyone using still using the python bindings?

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Anders Waldenborg <anders at 0x63.nu> wrote: > > * Auto generated vs manual ctypes declarations. > This is purely a cosmetic difference, as we both take the same approach of registering functions on a global/shared ctypes library instance. I think automatic is the way to go (just as long as the automatically generated code is easy to diff when

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 09:52:12PM -0700, Gregory Szorc wrote: > The automatic generation of the Python ctypes interfaces using the Clang > Python bindings is pretty friggin cool! A nice side effect is that everything is added to the interface. So it is easy to add a small proxy over the lib that shows which parts of the llvm-c API that is exercised by the tests. (have that in my bindings)

At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:12:08 +0100, Christoph Grenz wrote: > > Hello, > > Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012, 21:15:02 schrieb Gregory Szorc: > > There was some talk on IRC last week about desire for Python bindings to > > LLVM's Object.h C interface. So, I coded up some and you can now find > > some Python bindings in trunk at bindings/python. Currently, the >

On 3/17/2012 4:14 PM, Anders Waldenborg wrote: > FYI: > > I've also been working on new python bindings. > > My bindings are written using ctypes (just like the in-tree > clang/cindex bindings). Most of Core.h is bound, and stuff from > ExecutionEngine.h, Analysis, BitReader, BitWriter. The have fairly > good test coverage (using nosetests). The ctypes definitions are

hello folks! on this page (http://xapian.org/download) you have links to the Fink packages for xapian-core and omega; you may be interested to know that i've packaged the Xapian Python bindings. i'm working on similar packages for the Ruby and PHP bindings, and i'd be happy to inform you once they've been pushed out to the mirrors. -steve -- If this were played upon a

Hello All! Well I still have users which almost daily get corrupt dovecot files in their IMAP folders (Maildir style) and are unable to read their mail in this particular folders. When I delete dovecot files in this folder (rm -rf dove*) user can again read all messages. This is regular Linux CentOS 4.2 with SAN storage (boot from SAN) as disks. So this is EXT3 on LVM. BUT it is VERY

> The former co-author contributed, so he is still author and probably copyright > holder and has to be listed among the authors, otherwise it would be a CRAN > policy violation ... It's a bit of a philosophical question right now, but at some point in a developing package's life - particularly one that starts small but is subsequently refactored in growth - there may be no code

Hi, So now R CMD check starts to warn against :::, but I believe sometimes it is legitimate to use it when developing R packages. For example, I have some utils functions that are not exported but I want to share them across the packages that I maintain. I do not need to coordinate with other authors about these internal functions since I'm the only author and I know clearly what I'm

On May 10, 2008, at 05:44, Mahadevan R wrote: > I'd like to announce the availability of Python bindings for LLVM. > > It is built over llvm-c, and currently exposes enough APIs to build > an in-memory IR (and dump it!). It needs LLVM 2.3 latest and Python > 2.5 (2.4 should be sufficient, but I haven't tested). Tested only on > Linux/i386. > > Would love to

I have a need to add some server-side ACL functionality to the way ssh handles port forwarding. For a first pass, I want to be able to restrict -L port forwarding to localhost on the server only and I want to be able to specify the ports on Server. I was wondering if there would be any desire to incorporate said changes back into the main development tree? If so, are there coding guildlines

A question on authorship and attribution policy for the Wiki. I originally credited Alan Bartlett for the page content on HowTos/ConfigureNewVideoCard, but he was not comfortable with that and the reference got removed in the edit process. I generally do not include my name on Wiki pages I create, but it is fairly common practice. Should there be a statement in the Guidelines covering this

Hello, my group is investigating the development of a statistical program in support of some other work we are doing. Stats is not really our area of expertise and we would like to leverage existing code where possible. From your site, I have gathered that R is pretty capable and well used. We are currently developing in python and targetting a primarily windows environment. We would like to

Preferably SUSE, but I'll take help from any one who has done a 64 bit version. Mike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20071029/841e7791/attachment-0001.htm

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at unibuc.ro> wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> > wrote: > >> [...] >> >> At the very least, this is seems to be a flagrant violation of the >> *spirit* of the CRAN policy, which AFAIK is intended to enforce >>

Adrian, I am not on the CRAN or R-core teams, so the following is my own view, but... > library(QCA) > > Users are encouraged to cite this package as: > > Dusa, Adrian (2015). QCA: Qualitative Comparative Analysis. R Package > Version 1.2-0, > URL: http://cran.r-project.org/package=QCA > > This is just an encouragement, not a requirement, and the official citation

On a Debian/unstable chroot environment on smetana.debian.org ("Linux smetana 2.6.32-5-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 8 01:00:11 UTC 2011 sparc64 GNU/Linux") node_set_value and node_values fail with a "Bad address" error, see below. I am going to make an attempt at debugging this tonight, any advice would be appreciated. Cheers, -Hilko ,---- | (sid)bengen at

> Consider the case where a function creates and populates a Module, stuffs it > in an ExistingModuleProvider for the JIT, then returns the ModuleProvider, > dropping direct reference to the Module. (ModuleProvider takes ownership of > the Module.) I presume that your Python object is under the impression it > owns the Module; when that goes out of scope, its refcount goes to zero

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at unibuc.ro> wrote: > Dear Gabriel, > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> > wrote: > >> [...] >> >>> >>> I apologize for pushing this topic to the limit, but I haven't got an >>> answer to this question yet... >>> >>

On May 12, 2008, at 02:58, Mahadevan R wrote: >> Consider the case where a function creates and populates a Module, >> stuffs it in an ExistingModuleProvider for the JIT, then returns >> the ModuleProvider, dropping direct reference to the Module. >> (ModuleProvider takes ownership of the Module.) I presume that your >> Python object is under the impression

Removed the DEPENDS_app_meetme=ZAPTEL from the file menuselect.makedeps And in menuselect.makeopts I removed the DEPSFAILED line that had meetme in it. It then compiled. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of ?? Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 9:01 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - No Subject: