similar to: Why LLVM doesn't have debug information of function right parentheses？

I have implemented this exact behavior in an out of tree LLVM fork I maintain, where one of my users needed this behavior, and it seems to work well. What we have done is extend the definition of DISubprogram to contain a new field "endLine" which holds the line number of the closing brace. A pass late in our backend uses this information to set the DebugLoc of return instructions in our

Remembering a discussion as to why we do this from a few years ago: (*makes note to start writing design decisions this way down somewhere*) I was in favor of the current method for a few reasons: a) ensuring that it would "always happen" that we had either a unified return block or a well propagated location onto return instructions seemed like it would be difficult to maintain and

Simon, I also think of the way you did. :-) And from my initial investigation, clang should also has some work(i.e. provide the end location for the "endLine" field of DISubprogram), right? BTW, Simon, your fork of LLVM is open source or not? If open source, could you give the address of it?  Thanks < Simon Cook via llvm-dev> 在 2017-08-04 00:10:59 写道: On 03/08/17 16:21,

On 03/08/17 16:21, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev wrote: > >> >> I have implemented this exact behavior in an out of tree LLVM fork I >> maintain, where one of my users needed this behavior, and it seems to >> work well. What we have done is extend the definition of DISubprogram to >> contain a new field "endLine" which holds the line number of the closing

What happened with this? Is there something for review in Phabricator? Or was this put-on-hold/forgotten? I also have some users that complain that some gdb test suite tests don't work with LLVM due to missing debug info regarding ending brace. So gettint the location for the "endLine" field of DISubprogram etc should at least be a step in the right direction, and if someone already

Hello everyone, Hope it is the good place for this (I discuss the question of the right place below). Most of the time, warnings are more than 1000 characters long and thus are truncated. Most of the time, this generates printouts with unbalanced parentheses. Intelligent text editors which do parentheses highlighting get very confused with this. After too many warnings, they give errors, and

A rebased version of the lld patch is attached. Cheers, Rafael On 31 July 2017 at 15:11, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Tobias Edler von Koch <tobias at codeaurora.org> writes: > >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 07/31/2017 04:20 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev wrote: >>> However, do we need to start with

Hi, On 12/04/2018 15:35, Frozen via llvm-dev wrote: > I added one attribute named EndLine in LLVM IR before. LLVM's part is > not hard, but will modify many places in Clang. I success for it, you > can try this way. > For loops, we use a range to keep track of the start and end of the loop for remarks: http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Loop_1_1LocRange.html Maybe it would

I really wouldn't be sure this is the right direction to go anyway - as pointed out, there coudl be a return of a constant which would be a single instruction & it would make more sense to me to attribute that to the line where "return" is written, than where the closing brace is. I think this is, for my money, a legitimate difference in implementations between GCC and Clang -

I''m not sure whether this is a bug or whether I''m simply expecting Ferret queries to work in a way other than they''re intended. I notice that if use a query like: (other_text:"Collaborative tools") AND NOT other_text:podcasts I''ll get correct search results. However, if I put parentheses around the second part, like:

Dear list, I am importing data consisting of numbers into dataframes. Some of the numbers are flanked by parentheses or square brackets. Thus, they are not recognized as numeric and the corresponding column is of class "factor" which makes it hard/impossible use in plotting functions. Is there a way to remove brackets from numbers in a column/row/dataframe? Kind regards, Stefan --

Is there any way to maintain spaces, slashes, and parentheses in variable names when reading these into R? Of course, read.table converts these to periods. However, I know that it's not strictly illegal to have these characters in variable names as I am able to add them using the "variable editor" portion of the "data editor." I need to batch produce dozens of histograms

To create a more end-user readable table captions for modeld, I would like to get rid of the I(...) construct in formulae ("what's the hell does the I(..) mean in the contrast table") Example: effect ~ I(sqrt(nitro))*treat + I(nitro^2) should giv effect ~ sqrt(nitro)*treat + nitro^2 In know, this is a dumb model, just my test case. As far I remember, finding matching parentheses

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ]

Dear R-users, I would like to construct a list of arguments for a function in a format function (list(item1=c("A","B"), item2=c("B","C")), item3=...): The individual vectors in the list are permutations of colnames of a dataframe. The trouble is that I am not able to handle escaping of parentheses correctly. I was trying the following: library(gregmisc)

I have a little helper that lets me add legacy fields to models where they have common prefixes, suffixes, or something else weird. Here is the method signature: def legacy_fields(options = {}, *attributes) ..... end options is a hash containing things like :prefix => "post_" - and attributes is a list of attribute names. This gets mixed into the class with extend, so I call

Hello dear R-helpers, I haven't been able to figure out of find a solution in the R-help archives about how to delete all the characters contained in groups of parenthesis. I have a vector that looks more or less like this: myvector<-c("something (80 km/h, sd) & more (6 kg/L,sd)", "somethingelse (48 m/s, sd) & moretoo (50g/L , sd)") I want to extract all

I added one attribute named EndLine in LLVM IR before. LLVM's part is not hard, but will modify many places in Clang. I success for it, you can try this way. At 2018-04-12 16:53:21, "Björn Pettersson A" <bjorn.a.pettersson at ericsson.com> wrote: >What happened with this? Is there something for review in Phabricator? Or was this put-on-hold/forgotten? > >I also have

Hi Paul, Thanks for your response. Let me actually post more details visualizing my case. Assuming that can help. so the IR before the opt tool is running is: ; Function Attrs: nounwind define i16 @main() #0 !dbg !13 { entry: %retval = alloca i16, align 1 ... } ; Function Attrs: inlinehint nounwind define internal void @delay(i16 %d) #4 !dbg !69 { entry: %d.addr = alloca i16,

Hi! We are currently working on a science project and implemented a FunctionPass that clones a function (more precisely a constructor of a struct/class) and adds a parameter. First, we create a new function with a new function type, which includes the newly added parameter: Function *NF = Function::Create(NewFTy, F.getLinkage(), F.getName() + "Cloned", F.getParent()); and after