similar to: @devel - Why no inotify?

Hey, I thought about it a while back, haven't actually done it but I assume using inotify on the brick should work, at least in replica volumes (disperse probably wouldn't, you wouldn't get all events or you'd need to make sure your inotify runs on every brick). Then from there you could notify your clients, not ideal, but that should work. I agree that adding support for inotify

There is the ability to notify the client already. If you developed against libgfapi you could do it (I think). On May 3, 2018 9:28:43 AM PDT, lemonnierk at ulrar.net wrote: >Hey, > >I thought about it a while back, haven't actually done it but I assume >using inotify on the brick should work, at least in replica volumes >(disperse probably wouldn't, you wouldn't get

how about gluste's own client(s)? You mount volume (locally to the server) via autofs/fstab and watch for inotify on that mountpoing(or path inside it). That is something I expected was out-of-box. On 03/05/18 17:44, Joe Julian wrote: > There is the ability to notify the client already. If you > developed against libgfapi you could do it (I think). > > On May 3, 2018 9:28:43 AM

Is Inotify **fully supported** by OCFS2? Thank you

On 06/29/2014 02:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:32:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:26:37AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:57:38AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> We've had a report[1] of the virt_blk driver causing a lot of

On 06/29/2014 02:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:32:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:26:37AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:57:38AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> We've had a report[1] of the virt_blk driver causing a lot of

d911d9874801 ("kernfs: make kernfs_notify() trigger inotify events too") added fsnotify triggering to kernfs_notify() which requires a sleepable context. There are already existing users of kernfs_notify() which invoke it from an atomic context and in general it's silly to require a sleepable context for triggering a notification. The following is an invalid context bug triggerd by

d911d9874801 ("kernfs: make kernfs_notify() trigger inotify events too") added fsnotify triggering to kernfs_notify() which requires a sleepable context. There are already existing users of kernfs_notify() which invoke it from an atomic context and in general it's silly to require a sleepable context for triggering a notification. The following is an invalid context bug triggerd by

Hi, dovecot (1.0.alpha5) won't compile with inotify support because inotify.h can't be found. I'm running Linux 2.6.15-rc5 with headers from 2.6.12 (like most vendors). I've noticed that beagle and other inotify-enabled applications ships with an inotify.h. Could this be scheduled for alpha6? :-)

hi, the current code has changed include linux/inotify.h to sys/inotify.h since 2006-01-17, but that won't work with inotify*.h as documented in the wiki. One has to either revert back to linux/inotify.h, or add #include <sys/inotify-syscalls.h> to both configure.in and src/lib/ioloop-notify-inotify.c Or, just symlink sys/inotify.h -> linux/inotify.h. That's on Debian 3.1

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:32:40PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:09:02PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:10:25AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > > Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > >> What is the error message? > > > > > > > > /usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h:117: error: redefinition

I've added this to our klibc copy in the udev tree to support the recently added Inotify. Thanks, Kay -------------- next part -------------- diff --git a/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def b/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def --- a/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def +++ b/klibc/klibc/SYSCALLS.def @@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ int lchown32,lchown::lchown(const char * int getcwd::__getcwd(char *, size_t) <?> int utime(const

Hi, I note that dovecot supported inotify from -test77, and now the Linux kernel supports it starting from linux-2.6.13-rc3. So in theory I should be set to go. I'm using an -mm kernel, and it was built with inotify, on FC4/devel. However when trying to build with it using --with-notify=inotify, I always seem to be getting this message: checking for poll... yes configure: error:

Hi, I'm trying to compile Dovecot beta2 with inotify support, but this is unsuccessfull. First, it seems that the configure script is looking for inotify.h in /usr/include/sys, whereas it is in /usr/include/linux on my Debian Sarge system. But that's a minor point, let's make a symlink. % dpkg -S /usr/include/linux/inotify.h linux-kernel-headers: /usr/include/linux/inotify.h % dpkg

Hi, I've seen some chatter on NFS boards about kqueue being more reliable than inotify when used in NFSv3 and NFSv2. The chatter is a bit old so I don't know if it is true anymore. Anyone have pro/con experience with dovecot on the inotify/kqueue question when using NFS storage? I realize that kqueue is probably a bit slower and causes some delay with IDLE. Also, it may not really

Hi Reuben, I hope you don't mind me copying the dovecot list again. > dovecot: Aug 21 04:08:22 Error: IMAP(reuben): inotify_rm_watch() failed: > Invalid argument Odd. > This is with a 2.6.13-rc6-mm1 release. I've posted to LKML because there is > also a kernel stack produced at one point which looks inotify related (but the > messages above are contant). > See

Hi, I am compiling dovecot and I found dnotify & inotify. What does dnotify or inotify do ? do i need it. Thanks

(dovecot v1.2.16) I've notice the log notices about increasing /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances on my servers, and started wondering if inotify works for network/cluster filesystems.. I found this: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=311194 which says that there's no mechanism for one node to tell another node that a directory changed for GPFS.. And I

Hello, I've a problem on my system with inotify. In the smbd logfile are shown a lot messages like this: [2015/06/10 11:15:21.644453, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup) Failed to init inotify - Too many open files [2015/06/10 11:15:23.968497, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup)

Hi, I recently switched from courier imap to dovecot. With courier I had a working IDLE setup that informed me immediately when new mail arrived. With Dovecot it is different, sometimes i get an immediate result but most of the time it takes a rather long time for the notification to return to the client. For testing purposes I set mailbox_idle_check_interval = 1 and i now get the same