similar to: Fwd: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.0.0 released

The Gluster community celebrates 13 years of development with this latest release, Gluster 4.0. This release enables improved integration with containers, an enhanced user experience, and a next-generation management framework. The 4.0 release helps cloud-native app developers choose Gluster as the default scale-out distributed file system. We?re highlighting some of the announcements, major

Meeting date: 05/02/2018 (May 02nd, 2018), 19:30 IST, 14:00 UTC, 10:00 EDT BJ Link * Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 * Download: <TBD> Attendance * Raghavendra M (Raghavendra Bhat), Kaleb, Atin, Amar, Nithya, Rafi, Shyam Agenda * Commitment (GPLv2 Cure) * Email and Patch * [amarts] 20+ people already have done +1. Will wait another

Hi, The existing syntax in the gluster CLI for creating arbiter volumes is `gluster volume create <volname> replica 3 arbiter 1 <list of bricks>` . It means (or at least intended to mean) that out of the 3 bricks, 1 brick is the arbiter. There has been some feedback while implementing arbiter support in glusterd2 for glusterfs-4.0 that we should change this to `replica 2 arbiter

Gluster Users, This is to inform you that from the 4.0 release onward, packages for CentOS 6 will not be built by the gluster community. This also means that the CentOS SIG will not receive updates for 4.0 gluster packages. Gluster release 3.12 and its predecessors will receive CentOS 6 updates till Release 4.3 of gluster (which is slated around Dec, 2018). The decision is due to the following,

On 11/01/2018 18:32, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Gluster Users, > > This is to inform you that from the 4.0 release onward, packages for > CentOS 6 will not be built by the gluster community. This also means > that the CentOS SIG will not receive updates for 4.0 gluster packages. > > Gluster release 3.12 and its predecessors will receive CentOS 6 updates > till Release 4.3

Hello! Installed packages from SIG on centos7 , at first start it works, but after restart- not: ?glusterd2 --config /etc/glusterd2/glusterd2.toml DEBU[2018-04-04 09:28:16.945267] Starting GlusterD???????????????????????????? pid=221581 source="[main.go:55:main.main]" version=v4.0.0-0 INFO[2018-04-04 09:28:16.945824] loaded configuration from file???????????????

Hi Dmitry, How many nodes does the cluster have ? If the quorum is lost (majority of nodes are down), additional recovery steps are necessary to bring it back up: https://github.com/gluster/glusterd2/wiki/Recovery On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Dmitry Melekhov <dm at belkam.com> wrote: > Hello! > > Installed packages from SIG on centos7 , > > at first start it works,

Hi all, This a reminder about today's meeting. The meeting will start later today at 15:00 UTC. You can convert that to a local time with the following command in your terminal: $ date -d '15:00 UTC' Because the meeting is an open floor, topics and updates need to be added to the meeting pad at: https://bit.ly/gluster-community-meetings Hope to see you later online, Niels

Hi Shyam, 2018-03-01 22:08 GMT-03:00 Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>: > On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: >> This one fails http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm >> >> # yum install -y >>

On 03/05/2018 09:05 AM, Javier Romero wrote: >> I am about halfway through my own upgrade testing (using centOS7 >> containers), and it is patterned around this [1], in case that helps. > Taking a look at this. > > Thanks for confirming the install of the bits. On the upgrade front, I did find some issues that are since fixed. We are in the process for rolling out the GA

On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: > This one fails http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > # yum install -y > https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-4.0/glusterfs-4.0.0-0.1.rc1.el7.x86_64.rpm Thanks Javier. Isn't this what you intended though? yum upgrade

Hi all, Have tested on CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) with Kernel 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 This package works ok http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm # yum install http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm # yum install glusterfs-server # systemctl

After nearly 3 months, we have another preview release for GlusterD-2.0. The highlights for this release are, - GD2 now uses an auto scaling etcd cluster, which automatically selects and maintains the required number of etcd servers in the cluster. - Preliminary support for volume expansion has been added. (Note that rebalancing is not available yet) - An end to end functional testing framework

Meeting date: 04/18/2018 (April 18th, 2018), 19:30 IST, 14:00 UTC, 10:00 EDT <https://hackmd.io/yTC-un5XT6KUB9V37LG6OQ?both#BJ-Link>BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 - Download: https://bluejeans.com/s/qjebZ <https://hackmd.io/yTC-un5XT6KUB9V37LG6OQ?both#Attendance>Attendance - Nigel - Hari - Nithya - Kotresh - Raghavendra M - Shyam -

On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 at 03:32, Mayur Dewaikar <mdewaikar at commvault.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Are there any scale limitations in terms of how many nodes can be in a > single Gluster Cluster or how much storage capacity can be managed in a > single cluster? What are some of the large deployments out there that you > know of? > > The current design of GlusterD is not

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:53 AM, ?? <mrchenx at 126.com> wrote: > I want to write a python script and visual interface to manage glusterfs, > such as creating and deleting volumes.This can be easier to manage > glusterfs? > But,now ,I execute the glusterfs command using python's > subprocess.popen function?such as subprocess.Popen(GLUSTER_CMD, >

Hello Everyone, 3 weeks back we (most of the maintainers of Gluster projects) had a meeting, and we discussed about features required for Gluster 4.0 and also the possible dates. <https://hackmd.io/GwIwnGBmCsCM0FoDMsAcBTBAWADLLCYATLJiOmBVgMYAmAhvbLUA#summary> Summary: - It is agreed unanimously that the Gluster 4.0 should be feature based release, and not just time based. -

On 02/26/2018 02:03 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > RC1 is tagged in the code, and the request for packaging the same is on > its way. > > We should have packages as early as today, and request the community to > test the same and return some feedback. > > We have about 3-4 days (till Thursday) for any pending fixes and the > final release to happen, so

I did a quick google to see what Haolo Replication was - nice feature, very useful. Unfortunately I also found this: https://www.google.com/patents/US20160028806 >Halo based file system replication >US 20160028806 A1 Is this an issue? On 25 August 2017 at 10:33, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > 3 weeks back we (most of the

+1 Agree with Shyam. We can make more releases, but let's not stop release cycle. On 12-Oct-2017 8:32 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: On 10/12/2017 08:09 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: > >> [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/ >> >> [1] : https://review.gluster.org/18506 >>