similar to: df reports wrong full capacity for distributed volumes (Glusterfs 3.12.6-1)

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . For volumedisk1 I

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------

Hi Jose, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 18:28, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance > force' operation.

I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Team, **Please respond to me and my coworker listed in the Cc, since neither one of us are on this alias** QUICK PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: Cu created a dataset which contains all the zvols for a particular zone. The zone is then given access to all the zvols in the dataset using a match statement in the zoneconfig (see long problem description for details). After the initial boot of the zone

Hi, I have a cluster of 10 servers all running Fedora 24 along with Gluster 3.8. I'm planning on doing rolling upgrades to Fedora 27 with Gluster 3.12. I saw the documentation and did some testing but I would like to run my plan through some (more?) educated minds. The current setup is: Volume Name: vol0 Distributed-Replicate Number of Bricks: 2 x (2 + 1) = 6 Bricks: Brick1:

The `lofiadm'' man page describes how to export a file as a block device and then use `mkfs -F pcfs'' to create a FAT filesystem on it. Can''t I do the same thing by first creating a zvol and then creating a FAT filesystem on it? Nothing I''ve tried seems to work. Isn''t the zvol just another block device? -- -Gary Mills- -Unix Group-

Hi Nag Pavan Chilakam Can I use this command "gluster vol add-brick vol1 replica 2 file01g:/brick3/data/vol1 file02g:/brick4/data/vol1" in both file server 01 and 02 exited without add new servers. Is it ok for expanding volume? Thanks for your support Regards, Giang 2017-06-14 22:26 GMT+07:00 Nag Pavan Chilakam <nag.chilakam at gmail.com>: > Hi, > You can use add-brick

I am trying to configure a public file share on \\fs1\vol1 From a Windows 7 command prompt, I enter: dir \\fs1\vol1 Windows says: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. Where am I going wrong? Error log says: " SPNEGO login failed: NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER" - that must have something to do with this, but I thought that was the point of "map to guest = Bad User"

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Ziemowit Pierzycki <ziemowit at pierzycki.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a cluster of 10 servers all running Fedora 24 along with > Gluster 3.8. I'm planning on doing rolling upgrades to Fedora 27 with > Gluster 3.12. I saw the documentation and did some testing but I > would like to run my plan through some (more?) educated minds. >

Hi, I am rsyncing from my source server A to a destination server B. A/vol1 contains two files syslog.txt and syslog.bak B/vol1 contains five files syslog.txt, syslog.bak, initlog.txt, internal.txt, and internal.bak. I want to preserve the 5 files on B/vol1 when I do rsync from A to B. Here is the command I use: rsync -av --delete --exclude-from=EXCLUDEFILE A/ B I've tried the option

Ok guys & gals here is the scenario: 1.) Host RHEL 4 U3 2.6.9-34.0.2.EL 2.) OCFS2 latest version 3.) Successfully formatted & mounted OCFS2 filesystems on 2 nodes /dev/sdb1 /u02/oradata/usdev/voting /dev/sdc1 /u02/oradata/usdev/data01 /dev/sdd1 /u02/oradata/usdev/data02 /dev/sde1 /u02/oradata/usdev/data03 4.) Downloaded & installed ASMLib 2.0 on both nodes 5.) Ran

Hi, I have a question, let''s say I have a zvol named vol1 which is a clone of a snapshot of another zvol (its origin property is tank/myvol at mysnap). If I send this zvol to a different zpool through a zfs send does it send the origin too that is, does an automatic promotion happen or do I end up whith a broken zvol? Best regards. Maurilio. -- This message posted from

Hi, I've got troubles after few minutes of glusterfs operations. I setup a 4-node replica 4 storage, with 2 bricks on every server: # gluster volume create vms replica 4 transport tcp 192.168.7.1:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.2:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.3:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.4:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.1:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.2:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.3:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.4:/srv/vol2 I started copying files with

Morning All! Anyone ever tried exporting a StorNext CVFS filesystem from a Linux box??? I?ve got this Samba server (3.5.6) running on CentOS 5.4 and it?s working fine, exporting ext3, nfs and an IBM GPFS filesystem just fine. So I know Samba is good an my configuration is working. I tried to add the exportation of a StorNext CVFS volume and that doesn?t work. All the other volumes still work

I have not done the upgrade yet. Since this is a production cluster I need to make sure it stays up or schedule some downtime if it doesn't doesn't. Thanks. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Ziemowit Pierzycki <ziemowit at pierzycki.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >>

I am attempting to use rsync to copy a large filesystem from an HP-UX server to a Linux server with more than enough filespace. This operation fails. A small directory from the same HP-UX server can be transfered just as expected. The HP-UX server is the source. It has 1Gb RAM - the output of bdf for the volume the source files is on is: Filesystem kbytes used avail %used Mounted