similar to: Scheduled AutoCommit Function for WORM Feature

Hello Gluster Community, I am using Gluster3.10 in a 2-Node-Szenario (with CentosOS7-machines). After restarting one of the nodes, sometimes one of these two phenomena occurs: 1. The brick process of a volume on the newly started node is no longer running 2. The Brick Process Is Running But The First Knot Still Believes He Can not Reach The Brick (Health info reported "Transport

Hello Gluster Community, according to that set steps I have configured network encryption for management and I/O traffic: https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/how-to-enable-tlsssl-encryption-with-glusterfs-storage-cluster-on-linux/ I have chose the option for self-signed certificates, so each of the nodes has its own certificate and all of them are stored in the file glusterfs.ca. Each node in my

How can I turn autocommit off using my RODBC connection to an Informix database? I want to turn autocommit off, insert a thousand or so rows then commit. I would appreciate any body's input on this.

I''m trying to call save in active record after calling begin_db_transaction. In the code I see no place where it calls commit between create_or_update and the end of save. However in the log I see a commit happen...and I don''t want commit to be called does anyone know how to turn this off? thanks brian

Hi All, I would like to use glusterfs in an environment where storage servers are managed by an IT service - myself :) - and several users in the organization can mount the distributed fs. The users are root on their machines. As far as I know about glusterfs, a root client user may impersonate any uid/gid since it provides its uid/gid itself when it talks to the bricks (like nfsv3). The thing

Hi there, I think this bug, I have found recently, seems to be not trivial: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558507 In my opinion, it is a violation against the WORM defintion. Discussions are welcome ;-) Regards David Spisla -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, some more info on the previous admw0rm alert. Fwd'd from BugTraq Greetings, Jan-Philip Velders ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 21:17:40 +0100 From: Mixter <mixter@HOME.POPMAIL.COM> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG Subject: Re: ADM Worm. Worm for Linux x86 found in wild. The "ADM w0rm" is public and can be found at:

On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, Thomas Biege wrote: > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:34:10 +0100 (MET) > From: Thomas Biege <thomas@suse.de> > To: Jan-Philip Velders <jpv@jvelders.tn.tudelft.nl> > Cc: linux-security@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Security - intern] [linux-security] *ALERT*: ADM Worm. Worm for Linux x86 found in wild. > The worm just exploits old security holes, so

I need to turn off and on the autocommit in MySql is there a method in active records that allows me to do this? or is there a method which allows me to type in the pure mysql code "set autocommit=0" Thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I am testing Solr FTS on dovecot. Read online that some suggested to run cronjob commit every minute, and optimize once a day. I am using Solr 7.1.0 and I see some configurations: In /etc/default/solr.in.sh: #SOLR_OPTS="$SOLR_OPTS -Dsolr.autoSoftCommit.maxTime=3000" #SOLR_OPTS="$SOLR_OPTS -Dsolr.autoCommit.maxTime=60000" Also in solrconfig.xml: ??? <autoCommit>

-=> To moderator: I don't know whether it's wise to release the FTP-location I would recommend everyone to just look over their daemons, and run something like nessus against theirselves... Greetings, Jan-Philip Velders ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:26:59 -0700 From: "Ben Cantrick (Macky Stingray)" <mackys@MACKY.RONIN.NET> To:

Il messaggio sotto riportato, spedito dal vostro indirizzo di posta, contiene un VIRUS e pertanto non ? stato consegnato. Probabilmente il computer dal quale ? stato spedito ? infetto. CONTROLLATELO QUANTO PRIMA CON UN PROGRAMMA ANTIVIRUS! A message containing a virus was sent from your e-mail address. It is very likely this machine (or any other you use for e-mail) is infected! CHECK IT AS SOON

I have received the below notice about the rsync list. There is a worm among us. ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Return-Path: <postmaster@innevi.com> Received: from bleep.innevi.com ([64.30.26.9]) by mail.dubois-king.COM (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1K7n3p14977 for <ppalumbo@dubois-king.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:49:03 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain;

VIRUS ALERT Our content checker found virus: Worm.SomeFool.Gen-2 in email presumably from you (<logcheck-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>), to the following recipient: -> barbier at linuxfr.org Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator to do so. Delivery of the email was stopped! For your reference, here are headers from your email:

GlusterFS WORM hard links will not be created OS is CentOS7 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170707/aaea8dfc/attachment.html>

hard linksA read-only file system does not produce a hard link in GlusterFS WORM mode. Is it impossible? OS is CentOS7 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170710/837d3179/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: error.png

VIRUS ALERT Il sistema di scansione ha rilevato un problema in una email presumibilmente inviata da Lei -> (<openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org>), per il seguente destinatario: -> agtd09000r at istruzione.it La consegna del messaggio non e' potuta avvenire Di seguito i riferimenti della e-Mail inviata: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS -----------------------------

You are talking about random point patterns, since the glow-worms appear as ``stars'' (= points). See the package ``spatial'' (which comes with R) and try simulating a pattern using Strauss(). Or install the package ``spatstat'' from CRAN --- in this package there is a variety of ways to simulate ``regular'' random point patterns --- rMaternI, rMaternII, rSSI,

Hello Gluster Community, does anybody know how much performance (read/write bandwith) I will loose if I use an object store on top of a gluster volume? Any experiences? Regards David Spisla Software Developer david.spisla at iternity.com<mailto:david.spisla at iternity.com> www.iTernity.com<http://www.iternity.com/> Tel: +49 761-590 34 841 [cid:image002.jpg at

>Hi, > >we have activated fts-solr about a week ago and immediately started to >experience really *low* performance with MOVE and EXPUNGE commands. >After several days of googling, tcpdumping and straceing i was able to >find and resolve the problem. > >We are using Dovecot 2.2.27 from Debian Jessie (jessie-backports), >which is doing a soft commit in solr after