similar to: Diffrent volumes on diffrent interfaces

Hi, I run a proxmox system with a glustervolume over three nodes. I think about setup a second volume, but want to use the other interfaces on the nodes. Is this recommended or possible? Bye Gregor

Hi, I'm trying to create two gluster volumes over two nodes with two seperate networks: The names are in the hosts file of each node: root at gluster01 :~# cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 127.0.1.1 gluster01.peiker-cee.de gluster01 10.0.2.54 gluster02g1.peiker-cee.de gluster02g1 10.0.7.54 gluster02g2.peiker-cee.de gluster02g2 10.0.2.53

Hi, after a bit of time I play around with glusterfs again. For now I want to bind the glusterd to an specified interface/ip adress. I want to have a management net, where the service doesn't reachable and an cluster net where the service is working on. I read something about to define it in the /etc/glusterfs/glusterfsd.vol file but found no valid desciption of it. Even on

Hello All We?ve have a problem with cluster client mounts fail in mid run with this in the log glusterfsd.c:1332:cleanup_and_exit] (-->/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x7dc5) [0x7f640c8b3dc5] -->/usr/sbin/glusterfs(glusterfs_sigwaiter+0xe5) [0x7f640df4bfd5] -->/usr/sbin/glusterfs(cleanup_and_exit+0x6b) [0x7f640df4bdfb] ) 0-: received signum (15), shutting down. We?ve tried running debug but

Hello GlusterFS users, can anybody give me please his opinion about the following facts and questions: 4 storage server with 16 SATA bays, connected by GigE: Q1: Volume will be set up as distributed-replicated. Maildir, FTP Dir, htdocs, file store directory => as sub dir's in one big GlusterVolume or each dir in it's own GlusterVolume? Q2: Set up the bricks as a collection of

Hi at all! i'm trying to use glusterfs for the first time and have the following problem: I want to have two nodes. On node1 I have a raid1-sytem running in /raid/storage Both nodes see the other and now I try to create a volume. While I create the first volume on a fresh system (node1) for the first time, gluster said: volume create: glustervolume: failed: /raid/storage/ or a prefix of it

On 11/06/2017 6:42 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > If the dead server doesn't host any volumes (bricks of volumes to be > specific) then you can actually remove the uuid entry from > /var/lib/glusterd from other nodes Is that just the file entry in "/var/lib/glusterd/peers" ? e.g I have: gluster peer status Number of Peers: 3 Hostname: vnh.proxmox.softlog

On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 at 16:26, Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/06/2017 6:42 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > If the dead server doesn't host any volumes (bricks of volumes to be > specific) then you can actually remove the uuid entry from > /var/lib/glusterd from other nodes > > Is that just the file entry in

Status: We have a 3 node gluster cluster (proxmox based) - gluster 3.8.12 - Replica 3 - VM Hosting Only - Sharded Storage Or I should say we *had* a 3 node cluster, one node died today. Possibly I can recover it, in whcih case no issues, we just let it heal itself. For now its running happily on 2 nodes with no data loss - gluster for teh win! But its looking like I might have to replace the

Hello guys, I was wondering if someone could share their glusterfs volume and system settings if you are running glusterfs with infiniband networking. In particular I am interested in using the glusterfs + infiniband + kvm for virtualisation. However, any other implementation would also be useful for me. I've tried various versions of glusterfs (versions 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4beta) over the past

Hi list, I need a little help, I currently have a cluster with vmware and 3 nodes, I have a storage (Dell powervault) connected by FC in redundancy, and I'm thinking of migrating it to proxmox since the maintenance costs are very expensive, but the Doubt is if I can use glusterfs with a san connected by FC? , It is advisable? , I add another data, that in another site I have another cluster

Hi, any advice? El mi?., 25 abr. 2018 19:56, Ricky Gutierrez <xserverlinux at gmail.com> escribi?: > Hi list, I need a little help, I currently have a cluster with vmware > and 3 nodes, I have a storage (Dell powervault) connected by FC in > redundancy, and I'm thinking of migrating it to proxmox since the > maintenance costs are very expensive, but the Doubt is if I can

>but the Doubt is if I can use glusterfs with a san connected by FC? Yes, just format the volumes with xfs and ready to go For a replica in different DC, be careful about latency. What is the connection between DCs? It can be doable if latency is low. On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Ricky Gutierrez <xserverlinux at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, any advice? > > El mi?., 25 abr. 2018

On 11/06/2017 10:01 AM, WK wrote: > You replaced vna with vnd but it is probably not fully healed yet cuz > you had 3.8T worth of chunks to copy. No, the heal had completed. Finished about 9 hours before I rebooted. > > So you had two good nodes (vnb and vng) working and you rebooted one > of them? Three good nodes - vnb, vng, vnh and one dead - vna from node vng: root at

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:41 PM, <lemonnierk at ulrar.net> wrote: > > I'm thinking the following: > > > > gluster volume remove-brick datastore4 replica 2 > > vna.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 force > > > > gluster volume add-brick datastore4 replica 3 > > vnd.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 > > I think that should work

Upgraded recently from 3.8.15 to 3.10.5 and have seen a fairly substantial drop in read/write perfomance env: - 3 node, replica 3 cluster - Private dedicated Network: 1Gx3, bond: balance-alb - was able to down the volume for the upgrade and reboot each node - Usage: VM Hosting (qemu) - Sharded Volume - sequential read performance in VM's has dropped from 700Mbps to 300mbs - Seq Write

Could you disable cluster.eager-lock and try again? -Krutika On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com> wrote: > Upgraded recently from 3.8.15 to 3.10.5 and have seen a fairly substantial > drop in read/write perfomance > > env: > > - 3 node, replica 3 cluster > > - Private dedicated Network: 1Gx3, bond: balance-alb >

> I'm thinking the following: > > gluster volume remove-brick datastore4 replica 2 > vna.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 force > > gluster volume add-brick datastore4 replica 3 > vnd.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 I think that should work perfectly fine yes, either that or directly use replace-brick ? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

On 9/06/2017 9:56 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > gluster volume remove-brick datastore4 replica 2 > > vna.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 force > > > > gluster volume add-brick datastore4 replica 3 > > vnd.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 > > I think that should work perfectly fine yes, either that > or

I assume you will be using the volumes for VM workload.There is a 'virt' group of settings optimized for virtualization (location at /var/lib/glusterd/groups/virt) which is also used by oVirt. It guarantees that VMs can live migrate without breaking. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 19:00, Gilberto Ferreira<gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: Hi there.