similar to: Error - Disk Full - No Space Left

Hi to all, its sad that no one can help. I testet the 3 Bricks and created a new Volume. But if i want to create an folder, i got the same error message. Disk ist full? Looks seems ok and i need help. thx Taste

Hello Community and Devs, i have the following problem. I have a 3 Brick Distributed GFS. After Upgrading to the latest 3.13.x i cant create any directory on the volume which i access due NFS. I have on the smallest brick over 170GB free and also enough free inodes on all 3 Bricks. If i want to create a directory, the system says that there is not enough disk space left, but i have. I run a

Hi There, i think all VOIP clients for Linux are unusable! i got testet: Linphone + Linphonec all in version 12.2 Kphone gophone and other... the only programm that is usable is gnomemeeting... does anybody knew some other tools? Best Regards, Mark

Hi Eva, One more question. What version of gluster were you running before the upgrade? Thanks, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 09:52, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Eva, > > Can you send us the following: > > gluster volume info > gluster volume status > > The log files and tcpdump for df on a fresh mount point for that volume. > >

Hi Eva, I'm sorry but I need to get in touch with another developer to check about the changes here and he will be available only tomorrow. Is there someone else I could work with while you are away? Regards, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 22:00, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is

On 31 January 2018 at 21:50, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start > the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to > restart it? > > > That is not necessary. Let me get back to you on this tomorrow. Regards, Nithya > Thanks, > > Eva (865) 574-6894

On 31 January 2018 at 21:34, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > Responding to an earlier question: Before the upgrade, we were at 3.103 on > these servers, but some of the clients were 3.7.6. From below, does this > mean that ?shared-brick-count? needs to be set to 1 for all bricks. > > > > All of the bricks are on separate xfs

Nithya, Responding to an earlier question: Before the upgrade, we were at 3.103 on these servers, but some of the clients were 3.7.6. From below, does this mean that ?shared-brick-count? needs to be set to 1 for all bricks. All of the bricks are on separate xfs partitions composed hardware of RAID 6 volumes. LVM is not used. The current setting for cluster.min-free-inodes was 5%. I changed it to

The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to restart it? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:14 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at

Hi Freer, Our analysis is that this issue is caused by https://review.gluster.org/17618. Specifically, in 'gd_set_shared_brick_count()' from https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17618/9/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c . But even if we fix it today, I don't think we have a release planned immediately for shipping this. Are you planning to fix the code and re-compile? Regards,

Hi, I think we have a workaround for until we have a fix in the code. The following worked on my system. Copy the attached file to */usr/lib*/glusterfs/**3.12.4**/filter/*. (You might need to create the *filter* directory in this path.) Make sure the file has execute permissions. On my system: [root at rhgsserver1 fuse2]# cd /usr/lib/glusterfs/3.12.5/ [root at rhgsserver1 3.12.5]# l total 4.0K

Dear all, As you can see from the attachment I'm using R to automatically annotate peptide fragmentation mass spectra, which are represented by impulse plots. I'd like to poll you on approaches of how to deal as generally as possible with the two biggest annotation issues I run into: 1) very close annotated masses (impulses) with similar y-axis dimensions - resulting in overlapping labels

Hi Eva, Can you send us the following: gluster volume info gluster volume status The log files and tcpdump for df on a fresh mount point for that volume. Thanks, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 07:17, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > After OS update to CentOS 7.4 or RedHat 6.9 and update to Gluster 3.12.4, > the ?df? command shows only part of the available space on the

Amar, Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer

Estimados apañeRos: La duda o propuesta que os voy a plantear es a la vez metodológica y relacionada con R. Me encuentro trabajando con tres variables que son el resultado de un computo de porcentajes. Me explico, se toma una muestra de n casos (unos 6.500 aprox) pertenecientes a i individuos (unos 230 aprox) en la que se comprueba si un determinado evento ha ocurrido o no, anotándose 1 en

Hi, I'm a bit confused over the whole "dn" concept .... various documentation states that I should create new samba-entries with dn: uid=user,ou=<user-org>,dc=<domain> and other states that i should do it with dn: cn=user,ou=<user-org>,dc=<domain> Right now i have a few entries, created both ways... and since i'm not quite home in ldap, I haven't

Nithya, I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any way we could possibly resolve it today? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:26 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at

Hi, I have a very large data set (aprox. 100,000 rows.) The data comes from around 10,000 "groups" with about 10 entered per group. The values are in one column, the group ID is an integer in the second column. I want to normalize the values by group: for(g in unique(groups){ x[group==g] / sum(x[group==g]) } This works find in a loop, but is slow. Is there a faster way to do

Hello to everybody. I was wondering... is there a way to force wine to use always highest possible refrash rate - when I ran a game in Fullscreen? I ask because - for excample my good old Incubation works flawless on wine (testet with wine 0.9.27 and 0.9.28) but when I switch to fullscreen(640x480 for this game) the refresh rate is only at 60 HZ - and my eyes hurts after a while... (mty monitor

Does anyone know if there is a way to get a DB or any other means to see if I can see if a call is coming from a cell phone or not. If I am able to see if it is cellular or not is there any way to see aprox. what area the phone is in (I know this wont be simple but would it work if I have an agreeement with the cell phone companies) ? This is for the US. Thanks. Dovid -------------- next part