similar to: Project Technical Leadership Council

Announcing mountpoint, August 27-28, 2018 Our inaugural software-defined storage conference combining Gluster, Ceph and other projects! More details at: http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-May/034039.html CFP at: http://mountpoint.io/ Out of cycle updates for all maintained Gluster versions: New updates for 3.10, 3.12 and 4.0

Resolved! Try it again. - amye On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Amye, > > The form is not accessible, it says > > Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release > The form Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release is no longer accepting > responses. > Try contacting the owner of the form if you think this is a mistake. > > >

Awesome! You're on the list. Anyone else want to present? - amye On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur at redhat.com> wrote: > I propose a talk > > "Life of a gluster client process" > > We will have a look at one complete life cycle of a client process > which includes: > * mount script and parsing of args > * contacting glusterd

On 11/01/2018 18:32, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Gluster Users, > > This is to inform you that from the 4.0 release onward, packages for > CentOS 6 will not be built by the gluster community. This also means > that the CentOS SIG will not receive updates for 4.0 gluster packages. > > Gluster release 3.12 and its predecessors will receive CentOS 6 updates > till Release 4.3

Hey there, As not everyone's come back from the holidays (and other things!), I'll move this to later in the month. Watch this space for more, I'll reannounce with enough time for people to sign up. - amye On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com> wrote: > Interested in coming and giving a 5 minute lightning talk? > We'll do our next meeting

Hi Amye, The form is not accessible, it says Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release The form Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release is no longer accepting responses. Try contacting the owner of the form if you think this is a mistake. Regards Rafi KC On 06/05/2017 01:25 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > We're doing something new now with releases, running a retrospective > on what things we as a

I propose a talk "Life of a gluster client process" We will have a look at one complete life cycle of a client process which includes: * mount script and parsing of args * contacting glusterd and fetching volfile * loading and initializing the xlators * how glusterd sends updates of volume options * brick disconnection/reconnection * glusterd disconnection/reconnection * termination of

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote: > The archival process of the mailing list makes searching for past issues > possible. Slack, and irc in general, is a more closed garden than a public > archived mailing list. > > That said, irc/slack is good for immediate interaction between people, say, > gluster user with a nightmare and a

The archival process of the mailing list makes searching for past issues possible. Slack, and irc in general, is a more closed garden than a public archived mailing list. That said, irc/slack is good for immediate interaction between people, say, gluster user with a nightmare and a knowledgeable developer with deep understanding and willingness to assist. If there's a way to make a

Announcing mountpoint, August 27-28, 2018 Our inaugural software-defined storage conference combining Gluster, Ceph and other projects! More details at: http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-May/034039.html CFP at: http://mountpoint.io/ - closes June 15 Gluster Summit Videos - All our available videos (and slides) from Gluster Summit 2017 are up! Check out the

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> From today's community meeting, we had an item from the issue queue: >> https://github.com/gluster/community/issues/13 >> >> Should we have a Gluster Community slack team? I'm

Hi all! Based on the popularity of wanting more lightning talks at Gluster Summit, we'll be trying something new: Gluster Developer Conversations. This will be a one hour meeting on November 28th at UTC 15:00, with five 5 minute lightning talks and time for discussion in between. The meeting will be recorded, and I'll be posting the individual talks separately in our community channels.

Hey all! In the spirit of trying something new with the Community Meeting, this next one is changing a bit. I'm calling it 'Gluster Global Meetup' for lack of a better name (names welcomed) - and we're putting it on a video call. Same time as the community meeting, but a little different on the format. Here's a video call link for this that I'll add to the community

We're doing something new now with releases, running a retrospective on what things we as a community should stop, what we should start, and what we should continue. With last week's release, here's our quick form for 3.11 https://goo.gl/forms/OkhNZDFspYqdN00g2 We'll keep this open until June 15th to give everyone time to give us feedback. Thanks! -- Amye Scavarda | amye at

@Amye +1 for this great Idea, I am 100% for it. @Vijay for archiving purposes maybe it will be possible to use free service as https://slackarchive.io/ <https://slackarchive.io/> BR, Martin > On 9 Nov 2017, at 00:09, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com <mailto:amye at

It's great idea! :) But think about creating Slack for all RedHat provided opensource projects. For example one Slack workspace with separated Gluster, Ceph, Fedora etc. channels. I can't wait for it! Bartosz On 08.11.2017 22:22, Amye Scavarda wrote: > From today's community meeting, we had an item from the issue queue: > https://github.com/gluster/community/issues/13

>From today's community meeting, we had an item from the issue queue: https://github.com/gluster/community/issues/13 Should we have a Gluster Community slack team? I'm interested in everyone's thoughts on this. - amye -- Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead

Thanks to all who attended! Joe Julian to host our next one at 25 April, 15:00 UTC. https://bit.ly/gluster-community-meetings has our agenda, feel free to add topics! =========================================================== #gluster-meeting: Gluster Community Meeting - 11 April 2018 ============================================================ Meeting started by amye at 15:01:43 UTC. The

Joe, Agree with you on turning this around into something more positive. One aspect that would really help us decide on our next steps here is the actual number of deployments that will be affected by the removal of the gluster driver in Cinder. If you are running or aware of a deployment of OpenStack Cinder & Gluster, can you please respond on this thread or to me & Niels in private

Gluster Users, This is to inform you that from the 4.0 release onward, packages for CentOS 6 will not be built by the gluster community. This also means that the CentOS SIG will not receive updates for 4.0 gluster packages. Gluster release 3.12 and its predecessors will receive CentOS 6 updates till Release 4.3 of gluster (which is slated around Dec, 2018). The decision is due to the following,