similar to: Confusing lstat() performance

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Confusing lstat() performance"

2015 Apr 23
2
Samba 4 slow write
Hi Jones, many thanks again four your help and your time. Thanks for the patch too - I'll check it up. On my Ubuntu, there is a Samba 4.1.6. I'll install the samba source package, and will try to apply the patch, then - I hope - the package will be compiled as well. I'll notify to you about the result. (First, I need to upgrade that server.) Thanks again, Ervin On Thu, Apr
2018 Jan 31
2
swiotlb buffer is full
Hello, I've noticed firefox got randomly stuck, and as sometimes that leads to a complete system lock-up, I've checked dmesg and got this: [Jan29 10:49] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 2097152 bytes) [ +0.000033] swiotlb: coherent allocation failed for device 0000:01:00.0 size=2097152 [ +0.000004] CPU: 6 PID: 1023 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 4.15.0-rc8 #1 [ +0.000003]
2018 Feb 01
1
swiotlb buffer is full
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > Yeah, a lot of people were getting that, as a result of some drm/ttm > hugepage usage. > > Christian, did a fix ever end up going out? If so, what kernel was it > included in? https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/16/106 Alex > > -ilia > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Ricardo Nabinger
2005 Nov 28
20
open/stat64 syscalls run faster on Xen VM than standard Linux
Dear all, When I debugged the execution performance of an application using strace, I found there are some system calls like open and stat64 which run faster on XenLinux than the standard Linux. The following is the output of running "strace -c /bin/sh -c /bin/echo foo" on both systems. An open call runs averagely 109 usec on standard Linux but only 41 usecs on XenLinux. An stat64
2017 Sep 15
2
Confusing lstat() performance
On 15/09/17 02:45, Sam McLeod wrote: > Out of interest have you tried testing performance > with performance.stat-prefetch enabled? Not yet, because I'm still struggling to understand the current more basic setup's performance behaviour (with it being off), but it's definitely on my list and I'll report the outcome.
2017 Sep 17
0
Confusing lstat() performance
On 15/09/17 03:46, Niklas Hamb?chen wrote: >> Out of interest have you tried testing performance >> with performance.stat-prefetch enabled? I have now tested with `performance.stat-prefetch: on` but am not observing a difference. So far the only difference between `ls` and `bup index` I could observe is that `bup index` chdir()s into the directory to index, ls doesn't. But when
2017 Sep 17
3
Confusing lstat() performance
On 17/09/17 18:03, Niklas Hamb?chen wrote: > So far the only difference between `ls` and `bup index` I could observe > is that `bup index` chdir()s into the directory to index, ls doesn't. > > But when I `cd` into the dir and run `ls` without directory argument, it > is still much faster than bup index for each stat(). Hmm, bup uses the fchdir() syscall to go into the target
2017 Sep 18
2
Confusing lstat() performance
Hi Ben, do you know if the smallfile benchmark also does interleaved getdents() and lstat, which is what I found as being the key difference that creates the performance gap (further down this thread)? Also, wouldn't `--threads 8` change the performance numbers by factor 8 versus the plain `ls` and `rsync` that I did? Would you mind running those commands directly/plainly on your cluster to
2017 Sep 18
0
Confusing lstat() performance
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Niklas Hamb?chen" <mail at nh2.me> > To: "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com> > Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org > Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 9:49:10 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Confusing lstat() performance > > Hi Ben, > > do you know if the smallfile benchmark also does interleaved
2017 Sep 17
0
Confusing lstat() performance
I found the reason now, at least for this set of lstat()s I was looking at. bup first does all getdents(), obtaining all file names in the directory, and then stat()s them. Apparently this destroys some of gluster's caching, making stat()s ~100x slower. What caching could this be, and how could I convince gluster to serve these stat()s as fast as if a getdents() had been done just before
2018 Apr 16
1
lstat & readlink calls during glusterfsd process startup
Hi all, I am on gluster 3.10.5 with one EC volume 16+4. One of the machines go down previous night and I just fixed it and powered on. When glusterfsd processes started they consume all CPU on the server. strace shows every process goes over in bricks directory and do a lstat & readlink calls. Each brick directory is 8TB, %60 full. I waited for 24 hours for it to finish but it did not. I
2018 Feb 16
0
slow lstat on 3.12 disperse volume
Hi We've recently done some testing with a 3.12 disperse cluster. The performance of filesystem stat calls was terrible, taking multiple seconds. We dumped client side stats to see what was going on and noticed gluster STAT was the culprit. tpcdump shows a STAT call being sent and replied to quite fast, but still the client hangs for multiple seconds before returning. After downgrading
2001 Apr 03
1
lstat and NFS server not responding
In a somewhat unusual circumstance I have been having trouble when making R from source and with "R CMD build dse" forcing the machine to look for an NFS server which was not available, and then stalling. Our system administrator traced this back to the fact that these go through all the directories back to "/" , doing an lstat on everything. He suggests that that seems odd,
2006 Nov 06
3
Lstat & Dovecot
I am chasing a problem with dovecot generating an error: lstat(/var/spool/virtual_mailboxes/[domain dir]/[user dir]/Maildir/cur) failed: Permission denied I first tried making the directory world readable, same error. Them tried to lstat [the path] at the console and receive the error: lstat: command not found I have a manpage on lstat, but no file. "Yum provides" showed the
2017 Sep 15
0
Confusing lstat() performance
Hi Niklas, Out of interest have you tried testing performance with performance.stat-prefetch enabled? -- Sam McLeod @s_mcleod https://smcleod.net > On 14 Sep 2017, at 10:42 pm, Niklas Hamb?chen <mail at nh2.me> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a gluster 3.10 volume with a dir with ~1 million small files in > them, say mounted at /mnt/dir with FUSE, and I'm observing
2012 Jan 24
2
Help: read a proportion of high through-put data
Dear All, I have a text file, tab delimited, called "sample.txt",as follows: ID_REF 382 GC_Score Theta R B_Allele_Freq Log_R_Ratio 200003 BB 0.9101527 0.9734979 0.8788951 1 0 200006 AB 0.6003323 0.4385073 2.033364 0.4850979 0.01553433 I have explored various options of the command: read.table, with one as:
2013 Feb 12
1
Can't get working nsswitch, specifically "wbinfo -u"
Hi, my environment: Win2003 AD + Samba4 as second RW DC on debian wheeze. Samba compiled from source: samba --version Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-c932b13 Installed Samba4 according these: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Main_Page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Winbind Everything went good according tutorial, until I try get
2010 Apr 15
3
Viewing the NTP Server configured
How do i know which NTP server is my linux box contacting to synchronize its time with that of the server ? Thanks Jatin
2013 Jan 15
0
e1071 SVM, cross-validation and overfitting
I am accustomed to the LIBSVM package, which provides cross-validation on training with the -v option % svm-train -v 5 ... This does 5 fold cross validation while building the model and avoids over-fitting. But I don't see how to accomplish that in the e1071 package. (I learned that svm(... cross=5 ...) only _tests_ using cross-validation -- it doesn't affect the training.) Can
2007 Dec 02
3
creation date and OSX
Hi, I've been using rsync (OSX Tiger now Leopard) to backup my home folder daily using -a -H -A -X link-dest=dir to make incremental backups. There was a problem though since many files especially images, movies etc would be recopied each time instead of creating hard links. I have been testing the pre5 release and found that it seems to make hard links correctly for all files. I