similar to: Hybrid drives SSHD on Gluster peers

Hi, On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:35 AM, WK <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: > Pavel. > > Is there a difference between native client (fuse) and libgfapi in regards > to the crashing/read-only behaviour? I switched to FUSE now and the VM crashed (read-only remount) immediately after one node started rebooting. I tried to mount.glusterfs same volume on different server (not VM), running

Pavel. Is there a difference between native client (fuse) and libgfapi in regards to the crashing/read-only behaviour? We use Rep2 + Arb and can shutdown a node cleanly, without issue on our VMs. We do it all the time for upgrades and maintenance. However we are still on native client as we haven't had time to work on libgfapi yet. Maybe that is more tolerant. We have linux VMs mostly

Sorry, I did not start the glusterfsd on the node I was shutting yesterday and now killed another one during FUSE test, so it had to crash immediately (only one of three nodes were actually up). This definitely happened for the first time (only one node had been killed yesterday). Using FUSE seems to be OK with replica 3. So this can be gfapi related or maybe rather libvirt related. I tried

> On Apr 23, 2018, at 10:49 AM, WK <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: > > From some old May 2017 email. I asked the following: > "From the docs, I see you can identify the shards by the GFID > # getfattr -d -m. -e hex path_to_file > # ls /bricks/*/.shard -lh | grep GFID > > Is there a gluster tool/script that will recreate the file? > > or can you just sort

On 8/23/2017 10:44 PM, Pavel Szalbot wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:13 AM, WK <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: >> The default timeout for most OS versions is 30 seconds and the Gluster >> timeout is 42, so yes you can trigger an RO event. > I get read-only mount within approximately 2 seconds after failed IO. Hmm, we don't see that, even on busy VMs. We

Il 25-08-2017 21:48 WK ha scritto: > On 8/25/2017 12:56 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote: > > > We ran Rep2 for years on 3.4.? It does work if you are really,really? > careful,? But in a crash on one side, you might have lost some bits > that were on the fly. The VM would then try to heal. > Without sharding, big VMs take a while because the WHOLE VM file has > to be copied over.

On 8/25/2017 12:56 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote: > > >> WK wrote: >> 2 node plus Arbiter. You NEED the arbiter or a third node. Do NOT try 2 >> node with a VM > > This is true even if I manage locking at application level (via > virlock or sanlock)? We ran Rep2 for years on 3.4.? It does work if you are really,really? careful,? But in a crash on one side, you might

Hi, On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:13 AM, WK <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: > The default timeout for most OS versions is 30 seconds and the Gluster > timeout is 42, so yes you can trigger an RO event. I get read-only mount within approximately 2 seconds after failed IO. > Though it is easy enough to raise as Pavel mentioned > > # echo 90 > /sys/block/sda/device/timeout AFAIK

From some old May 2017 email. I asked the following: "From the docs, I see you can identify the shards by the GFID # getfattr -d -m. -e hex/path_to_file/ # ls /bricks/*/.shard -lh | grep /GFID Is there a gluster tool/script that will recreate the file? or can you just sort them sort them properly and then simply cat/copy+ them back together? cat shardGFID.1 .. shardGFID.X > thefile

OK, at least its not an *issue* with Gluster. I didn't expect any but you never know. I have been amused at the 'lack' of discussion on Teaming performance found on Google searches. There are lots of 'here it is and here is how to set it up' articles/posts, but no 'ooh-wee-wow it is awesome' comments. It seems that for most people Bonding has worked it kinks out

Hi R Users, I do have very big data sets and wanted to run some of the analyses many times with randomization (1000 times). I have done the analysis using an example data but it need to be done with randomized data (1000 times). I am doing manually for 10000 times but taking so much time, I wonder whether it is possible to perform the analysis with creating a loop for many replicated datasets?

I haven't done any testing of performance differences, but on my oVirt/rhev i use standard bonding as that's that it supports. On the stand along gluster nodes I use teaming for bonding. Teaming may be slightly easier to manage, but not by much if you are already used to bond setups. I haven't noticed any bugs or issues using teaming. *David Gossage* *Carousel Checks Inc. | System

Dear List, After running a compound symmetric model using gls, I realized that the default contrasts were not the ones that made the most sense given the biological relationships among the factor levels. When I either changed the factor levels to re-arrange the order they occur in the gls model (not shown below) OR specifically change the contrasts I get the exact same estimates for the

Nobody has any clues about the tls cafile ? Regards Le 04/08/2020 ? 15:18, MAS Jean-Louis via samba a ?crit?: > I have several samba servers on Debian 10 all using : > > samba 2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1 amd64 > > I use tls cafile, tls certfile and tls keyfile with certificates from > Sectigo (https://cert-manager.com) > > And when checking my connexion from the

If I were guessing, based on some experience with certificate usage in other apps, concatenate your certificate and intermediate certificates into a single file which is then your "tls certfile" then point "tls cafile" to your issuers proper CA or just to your distro's CA bundle, e.g /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt. Nick On 06/08/2020 16:36, MAS Jean-Louis via samba

I have several samba servers on Debian 10 all using : samba 2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1 amd64 I use tls cafile, tls certfile and tls keyfile with certificates from Sectigo (https://cert-manager.com) And when checking my connexion from the samba server, or from outside, I've got "unable to verify the first certificate" even if tls_cafile is provided in smb.conf. What is wrong

Hi, I have sort of a newbie question. I've seriously put a lot of effort into how to handle simple replicates in a repeated ANOVA design, but haven't had much luck. I really liked reading "Notes on the use of R for psychology experiments and questionnaires", by Jonathan Baron and Yuelin Li ( http://www.psych.upenn.edu/~baron/rpsych/rpsych.html ) but still didn't run across

On 4 October 2017 at 23:34, WK <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: > Just so I know. > > Is it correct to assume that this corruption issue is ONLY involved if you > are doing rebalancing with sharding enabled. > > So if I am not doing rebalancing I should be fine? > That is correct. > -bill > > > > On 10/3/2017 10:30 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > >

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=537 Summary: Identification should depend on port number Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Thanks for the clarification. That behaviour is quite weird as arbiter bricks should hold?only metadata. What does the following show on host?uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01: du -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brickdu -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick3/brickdu -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick2/brick If indeed the shards are taking space -?that is a really strange situation.From which version