similar to: What is the difference between FORGET and UNLINK fops

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "What is the difference between FORGET and UNLINK fops"

2017 Nov 13
0
What is the difference between FORGET and UNLINK fops
Filtering the brick logs in TRACE mode with rpcsvc.c does show the FOPS. >From this, I've realized that LOOKUP is actually dns lookup. This actually differs from NFS lookup operation. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 13, 2017 9:40 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Can I get a brief description of all the
2017 Nov 13
2
What is the difference between FORGET and UNLINK fops
Hi, Can I get a brief description of all the FOPS in gluster or the location of the source code file so that I will try to get an understanding myself? Few FOPS I'm not clear like FORGET, UNLINK, FLUSH, LOOKUP Or is there a way I can tunnel through the FOPS that that are happening in the background for each operation? I have tried this to find from a brick logfile in TRACE mode, but there
2018 Jan 03
1
stale file handle on gluster NFS client when trying to remove a directory
An ESTALE error usually means the gfid could not be found. Does repeating the "rm -rf" delete the directory? Regards, Nithya On 3 January 2018 at 12:16, Jeevan Patnaik <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I haven't found any root cause or workaround for this yet. Can any one > help me in underatanding the issue? > > Regards, > Jeevan. > >
2018 Jan 03
0
stale file handle on gluster NFS client when trying to remove a directory
Hi all, I haven't found any root cause or workaround for this yet. Can any one help me in underatanding the issue? Regards, Jeevan. On Dec 21, 2017 8:20 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > After running rm -rf on a directory, the files under it got deleted, but > the directory was not deleted and was showing stale file handle
2017 Dec 10
0
What does gluster do when it's idle?
Hi, Also I forgot to mention there are DUMP and PORTBYBRICK calls too. I understood these too calls are to get updated on gluster configuration. But all these two calls are to a particular node only while there are total (2+1)*3= 6 nodes in my configuration. Why so? What exactly is DUMP and PORTBYBRICK? Regards Jeevan. On Dec 10, 2017 6:47 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at
2017 Nov 13
0
What is it with trusted.io-stats-dump?
trusted.io-stats-dump is a virtual (not physical) extended attribute. The code is written in a way that a request to set trusted.io-stats-dump gets bypassed at the io-stats translator layer on the stack and there it gets converted into the action of dumping the statistics into the provided output file path. See io_stats_setxattr() implementation in io-stats.c for more details. HTH, Krutika On
2017 Nov 15
0
Is there any performance impact in setting up every gluster client as a NFS server?
Hi, What I meant was that every host acts as nfs server for itself alone. A is mounted on A, B is mounted on B etc. So, if a host is crashed or storage of the host is not available, other hosts won't be affected. And how bad can be the performance overhead in having multiple nfs servers? Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 15, 2017 10:07 AM, "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri at redhat.com>
2017 Nov 13
0
What is it with trusted.io-stats-dump?
Hi, >From strace, I can see the system calls setxattr and getxattr. Two things I don't understand is: 1. how does the file got created so quickly, from where it read the stats. 2.why is the added attribute missing if I check with getfattr? Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 13, 2017 12:40 PM, "Amar Tumballi" <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:14 PM,
2017 Nov 13
0
What is it with trusted.io-stats-dump?
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Jeevan Patnaik <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to understand how the extended attribute trusted.io-stats-dump > works. > > setfattr -n trusted.io-stats-dump -v /tmp/gluster_perf_stats/io-stats-pre.txt > /mnt/gluster/gv0_glusterfs > > I can see that the io-stats-pre.txt is created. But how and what happened
2017 Nov 14
1
Is there any performance impact in setting up every gluster client as a NFS server?
Hi, We have around 60 hosts and each of them acts as glusterFs clients as well as server. To achieve HA, my underatanding is that we can use Ganesha NFS alone (and not Kernel NFS) and for above 3.10 versions, the HA packages are not ready yet. So, I'm thinking if I can avoid HA by making each client acts as server for itself. i.e.,the server name specified while mounting is localhost. So,
2017 Dec 21
2
stale file handle on gluster NFS client when trying to remove a directory
Hi, After running rm -rf on a directory, the files under it got deleted, but the directory was not deleted and was showing stale file handle error. After 18 minutes, I'm able to delete the directory. So could anyone help me in knowing what could have happened or when in general I get such errors. The following is NFS log: [2017-12-21 13:56:01.592256] I [MSGID: 108019]
2017 Dec 10
2
What does gluster do when it's idle?
Hi, There's no client activity and I have collected tcpdump for 5 mins on one of the glusterFs sever which is also a client with gluster NFS mount. From tcpdump I see that for every few seconds, STAT & STATFS commands are run. For whichctory are these commands being run and why? Regards, Jeevan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2017 Nov 13
4
What is it with trusted.io-stats-dump?
Hi, I am trying to understand how the extended attribute trusted.io-stats-dump works. setfattr -n trusted.io-stats-dump -v /tmp/gluster_perf_stats/io-stats-pre.txt /mnt/gluster/gv0_glusterfs I can see that the io-stats-pre.txt is created. But how and what happened in the background? And why I can't I see the attribute with getfattr again? getfattr -dm- /mnt/gluster/gv0_glusterfs # file:
2015 Nov 09
0
[PATCH v2 1/5] debugfs: add infrastructure to add files with other fops than only read
v2: use the same object for private data as with the drm debugfs functions Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau at karolherbst.de> --- drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c index 5392e07..fe53743 100644 ---
2018 Mar 05
1
[Gluster-devel] Removal of use-compound-fops option in afr
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Pranith, > > > >> We found that compound fops is not giving better performance in >> replicate and I am thinking of removing that code. Sent the patch at >> https://review.gluster.org/19655 >> >> > If I understand it right, as of now AFR is the only component
2020 Apr 24
2
[PATCH 3/5] drm/nouveau: utilize subconnector property for DP
From: Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev at intel.com> Since DP-specific information is stored in driver's structures, every driver needs to implement subconnector property by itself. v2: rebase Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev at intel.com>
2020 Feb 04
2
Can I delete a function argument and its corresponding code from a file
I have a following sample function in a file which contains only function definitions like this. void mul(int x, int y, int& out, *int* arr*) { * arr[0] = 2;* * arr[1] = 1;* out = x * y; } I want to convert it to void mul(int x, int y, int& out) { out = x * y; } file contains only above function definitions. -- Thanks & Regards Jeevan -------------- next part --------------
2020 Apr 01
0
[PATCH 3/5] drm/nouveau: utilize subconnector property for DP
Since DP-specific information is stored in driver's structures, every driver needs to implement subconnector property by itself. Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev at intel.com> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b at intel.com>
2020 Aug 16
0
[v3] drm/nouveau: utilize subconnector property for DP
From: Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev at intel.com> Since DP-specific information is stored in driver's structures, every driver needs to implement subconnector property by itself. v2: rebase v3: renamed a function call Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Vasilev
2020 Apr 07
0
[PATCH 3/5] drm/nouveau: utilize subconnector property for DP
From: Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev at intel.com> Since DP-specific information is stored in driver's structures, every driver needs to implement subconnector property by itself. v2: rebase Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev at intel.com>