similar to: What is the difference between FORGET and UNLINK fops

Filtering the brick logs in TRACE mode with rpcsvc.c does show the FOPS. >From this, I've realized that LOOKUP is actually dns lookup. This actually differs from NFS lookup operation. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 13, 2017 9:40 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Can I get a brief description of all the

Hi Ben, Yes, I was referring to the same link before and I think most of the FOPS I've understood from the definitions there and I'll update if I found any corrections or new definitions. Btw, my previous underatanding about LOOKUP is wrong, its NOT dns lookup. Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 14, 2017 11:02 AM, "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com> wrote: Here is some of the

Hi, I am trying to understand how the extended attribute trusted.io-stats-dump works. setfattr -n trusted.io-stats-dump -v /tmp/gluster_perf_stats/io-stats-pre.txt /mnt/gluster/gv0_glusterfs I can see that the io-stats-pre.txt is created. But how and what happened in the background? And why I can't I see the attribute with getfattr again? getfattr -dm- /mnt/gluster/gv0_glusterfs # file:

Hi, There's no client activity and I have collected tcpdump for 5 mins on one of the glusterFs sever which is also a client with gluster NFS mount. From tcpdump I see that for every few seconds, STAT & STATFS commands are run. For whichctory are these commands being run and why? Regards, Jeevan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Also I forgot to mention there are DUMP and PORTBYBRICK calls too. I understood these too calls are to get updated on gluster configuration. But all these two calls are to a particular node only while there are total (2+1)*3= 6 nodes in my configuration. Why so? What exactly is DUMP and PORTBYBRICK? Regards Jeevan. On Dec 10, 2017 6:47 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at

An ESTALE error usually means the gfid could not be found. Does repeating the "rm -rf" delete the directory? Regards, Nithya On 3 January 2018 at 12:16, Jeevan Patnaik <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I haven't found any root cause or workaround for this yet. Can any one > help me in underatanding the issue? > > Regards, > Jeevan. > >

Hi, After running rm -rf on a directory, the files under it got deleted, but the directory was not deleted and was showing stale file handle error. After 18 minutes, I'm able to delete the directory. So could anyone help me in knowing what could have happened or when in general I get such errors. The following is NFS log: [2017-12-21 13:56:01.592256] I [MSGID: 108019]

Hi all, I haven't found any root cause or workaround for this yet. Can any one help me in underatanding the issue? Regards, Jeevan. On Dec 21, 2017 8:20 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > After running rm -rf on a directory, the files under it got deleted, but > the directory was not deleted and was showing stale file handle

trusted.io-stats-dump is a virtual (not physical) extended attribute. The code is written in a way that a request to set trusted.io-stats-dump gets bypassed at the io-stats translator layer on the stack and there it gets converted into the action of dumping the statistics into the provided output file path. See io_stats_setxattr() implementation in io-stats.c for more details. HTH, Krutika On

Hi, We have around 60 hosts and each of them acts as glusterFs clients as well as server. To achieve HA, my underatanding is that we can use Ganesha NFS alone (and not Kernel NFS) and for above 3.10 versions, the HA packages are not ready yet. So, I'm thinking if I can avoid HA by making each client acts as server for itself. i.e.,the server name specified while mounting is localhost. So,

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Pranith, > > > >> We found that compound fops is not giving better performance in >> replicate and I am thinking of removing that code. Sent the patch at >> https://review.gluster.org/19655 >> >> > If I understand it right, as of now AFR is the only component

Hi, >From strace, I can see the system calls setxattr and getxattr. Two things I don't understand is: 1. how does the file got created so quickly, from where it read the stats. 2.why is the added attribute missing if I check with getfattr? Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 13, 2017 12:40 PM, "Amar Tumballi" <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:14 PM,

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Jeevan Patnaik <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to understand how the extended attribute trusted.io-stats-dump > works. > > setfattr -n trusted.io-stats-dump -v /tmp/gluster_perf_stats/io-stats-pre.txt > /mnt/gluster/gv0_glusterfs > > I can see that the io-stats-pre.txt is created. But how and what happened

Hi, I got the same problem as Juergen, My volume is a simple replicated volume with 2 host and GlusterFS 3.2.0 Volume Name: poolsave Type: Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: ylal2950:/soft/gluster-data Brick2: ylal2960:/soft/gluster-data Options Reconfigured: diagnostics.brick-log-level: DEBUG network.ping-timeout: 20 performance.cache-size: 512MB

Hi, everyone. Its nice meeting you. I am poor at English.... I am writing this because I'd like to update GlusterFS to 3.2.2-1,and I want to change from gluster mount to nfs mount. I have installed GlusterFS 3.2.1 one week ago,and replication 2 server. OS:CentOS5.5 64bit RPM:glusterfs-core-3.2.1-1 glusterfs-fuse-3.2.1-1 command gluster volume create syncdata replica 2 transport tcp

Without the glusterd log file and the core file or the backtrace I can't comment anything. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:09 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Any suggestion.... > > On Dec 6, 2017 11:51, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> We are getting the crash in glusterd after

v2: use the same object for private data as with the drm debugfs functions Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau at karolherbst.de> --- drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c index 5392e07..fe53743 100644 ---

Hi Atin, Please find the backtrace and logs files attached here. Also, below are the BT from core. (gdb) bt #0 0x00003fff8834b898 in __GI_raise (sig=<optimized out>) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:55 #1 0x00003fff88350fd0 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 [**ALERT: The abort() might not be exactly invoked from the following function line. If the trail function

I hope these logs were sufficient... please let me know if you require more logs. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:26 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Atin, > > Please find the backtrace and logs files attached here. > > Also, below are the BT from core. > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0x00003fff8834b898 in __GI_raise (sig=<optimized out>) at >

I have a following sample function in a file which contains only function definitions like this. void mul(int x, int y, int& out, *int* arr*) { * arr[0] = 2;* * arr[1] = 1;* out = x * y; } I want to convert it to void mul(int x, int y, int& out) { out = x * y; } file contains only above function definitions. -- Thanks & Regards Jeevan -------------- next part --------------