similar to: Gluster Summit BOF - Encryption

Hi, We had a BOF on Rebalance at the Gluster Summit to get feedback from Gluster users. - Performance has improved over the last few releases and it works well for large files. - However, it is still not fast enough on volumes which contain a lot of directories and small files. The bottleneck appears to be the single-threaded filesystem crawl. - Scripts using the fix-layout and file migration

Hi all, We had a BoF about Upstream Testing and increasing coverage. Discussion included: - More docs on using the gluster-specific libraries. - Templates, examples, and testcase scripts with common functionality as a jumping off point to create a new test script. - Reduce the number of systems required by existing libraries (but scale as needed). e.g., two instead of eight. - Providing

Hi all, We had a BoF about Upstream Testing and increasing coverage. Discussion included: - More docs on using the gluster-specific libraries. - Templates, examples, and testcase scripts with common functionality as a jumping off point to create a new test script. - Reduce the number of systems required by existing libraries (but scale as needed). e.g., two instead of eight. - Providing

I thought people on this list might be interested in the Xen Developer Summit in Edinburgh in October (alongside LinuxCon EU and a bunch of other confs). Lars tells me that they are going to be advertising more widely next week so if you are interested now would be a good time to sign up. Ian. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Dear Community member, the schedule for the Xen Project

I propose to present on one or more of the following topics: * NFS-Ganesha Architecture, Roadmap, and Status * Architecture of the High Availability Solution for Ganesha and Samba - detailed walk through and demo of current implementation - difference between the current and storhaug implementations * High Level Overview of autoconf/automake/libtool configuration (I gave a presentation in BLR

On 08/17/2016 09:56 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > I propose to present on one or more of the following topics: > > * NFS-Ganesha Architecture, Roadmap, and Status,Jiffin Thotton copresenter. > * Architecture of the High Availability Solution for Ganesha and Samba > - detailed walk through and demo of current implementation > - difference between the current and storhaug

During Gluster Summit, we discussed gluster volumes as storage for VM images - feedback on the usecase and upcoming features that may benefit this usecase. Some of the points discussed * Need to ensure there are no issues when expanding a gluster volume when sharding is turned on. * Throttling feature for self-heal, rebalance process could be useful for this usecase * Erasure coded volumes with

As part of Gluster Summit, we did discuss about Documentation and how to improve it further. In the topic, one of the major request was to make sure we version the document, so all things which were valid for a release will still be valid in that doc, even after it got changed in later versions. - Please version the document, and tag them properly after every release. - Readthedoc already

Hi folks, I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing: [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs ecryptfs 85424 0 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# yum -q repolist id del repositorio nombre del repositorio

On 10/31/2015 08:24 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing: > > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r > 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs > ecryptfs 85424 0 > > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]#

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sahina Bose" <sabose at redhat.com> > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:46:57 AM > Subject: [Gluster-users] BoF - Gluster for VM store use case > > During Gluster Summit, we discussed gluster volumes as storage for VM

Rainy Days via rsync wrote: > Hi, > > My company have been using rsync to sync our file to a backup server (running rsync daemon), and now we would like to store them encrypted. > I found some thread that discussed this issue but they are pretty old (about 10 years ago). So I send this question again and looking for any new approach. > Is there any option or module for rsync to

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1307 Low Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1307.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 685ff985b7e4c55879b31822f4b81bd2 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.i386.rpm 652450acf1c7922023e7da04bc86a590 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1241 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1241.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0cb2b6619882f6492b3c0190eace5bb4 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.i386.rpm 7a9e58b26bc1e9bb944ba131db28cad9 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1503 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 7b3237947343a7dc3997db354dfbd762 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.i386.rpm c0b39223824b2154eaefe4d9b0409672 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.x86_64.rpm

I shared raid 5 array which is mounted using ecryptfs to a windows 10 client using samba share . When i do a robocopy of file greater than size of 7GB the samba throws an error NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND which can be observed in wire shark . Setup : ---------- Host with ubuntu 16.01 -------------------> windows 10 client (Samba server,

Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> writes: > Could you try what happens, if you create the hardlink manually as the > vmail user _two_ times, if the first link() succeeds. Maybe: > > 1) hard links won't work on your encfs, > 2) link() fails with "Operation not permitted" instead of "File exists" in > your case, if the target file

Folks, OLS is fast approaching. There is a session on virtualization at the Kernel Summit, with Keir and Zach invited, which will probably last an hour(?). There is also a Xen BoF currently scheduled (Thursday, 7/20, 7:00PM) which will cover Xen specific issues. And there are approximately 3 or 4 paper presentations on related subjects. None of the above are going to allow for adequate time to

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1307 Low Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1307.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 880c55fb91b5da7be83571f90ed995c0 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.i386.rpm 1dc8b59dfdfa7961103e3b91c780ea42 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-5.el5.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1241 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1241.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: aa9dfe1c4fb367d7a43d76ed3c680ea4 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.i386.rpm af16fc4c26f57cc3328bf7b5233cdba8 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-5.el5_7.2.i386.rpm