similar to: Extremely slow du

Hi Vijay Thanks for your quick response. I am using gluster 3.8.11 on Centos 7 servers glusterfs-3.8.11-1.el7.x86_64 clients are centos 6 but I tested with a centos 7 client as well and results didn't change gluster volume info Volume Name: atlasglust Type: Distribute Volume ID: fbf0ebb8-deab-4388-9d8a-f722618a624b Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 5 Transport-type: tcp

Can you please provide more details about your volume configuration and the version of gluster that you are using? Regards, Vijay On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:35 PM, mohammad kashif <kashif.alig at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I have just moved our 400 TB HPC storage from lustre to gluster. It is > part of a research institute and users have very small files to big files > ( few

Hi Vijay I have enabled client profiling and used this script https://github.com/bengland2/gluster-profile-analysis/blob/master/gvp-client.sh to extract data. I am attaching output files. I don't have any reference data to compare with my output. Hopefully you can make some sense out of it. On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote: > Would it be

Would it be possible for you to turn on client profiling and then run du? Instructions for turning on client profiling can be found at [1]. Providing the client profile information can help us figure out where the latency could be stemming from. Regards, Vijay [1] https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Performance%20Testing/#client-side-profiling On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at

Hi Vijay Did you manage to look into the gluster profile logs ? Thanks Kashif On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:40 AM, mohammad kashif <kashif.alig at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Vijay > > I have enabled client profiling and used this script > https://github.com/bengland2/gluster-profile-analysis/blob/ > master/gvp-client.sh to extract data. I am attaching output files. I >

Hi Mohammad, A lot of time is being spent in addressing metadata calls as expected. Can you consider testing out with 3.11 with md-cache [1] and readdirp [2] improvements? Adding Poornima and Raghavendra who worked on these enhancements to help out further. Thanks, Vijay [1] https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release-notes/3.9.0/ [2] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/166 On

Hi Kashif, Thank you for your feedback! Do you have some data on the nature of performance improvement observed with 3.11 in the new setup? Adding Raghavendra and Poornima for validation of configuration and help with identifying why certain files disappeared from the mount point after enabling readdir-optimize. Regards, Vijay On 07/11/2017 11:06 AM, mohammad kashif wrote: > Hi Vijay and

Hi, This is my code (my data is attached): library(languageR) library(rms) library(party) OLDDATA <- read.csv("/Users/Abigail/Documents/OldData250412.csv") OLDDATA$YD <- factor(OLDDATA$YD, label=c("Yes", "No"))? OLDDATA$ND <- factor(OLDDATA$ND, label=c("Yes", "No"))? attach(OLDDATA) defaults <- cbind(YD, ND) set.seed(47) data.controls

Dear R wizards--- I have a wrapper on mclapply() that makes it a little easier for me to do multiprocessing. (Posting this may make life easier for other googlers.) I pass a data frame, a vector that tells me what rows should be recomputed, and the function; and I get back a vector or matrix of answers. d <- data.frame( id=1:6, val=11:16 ) loc <- c(TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE)

Isn't anything in a data frame that is not explicitly numeric a *factor*? -Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Dalgaard BSA [mailto:p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk] > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 5:32 PM > To: Erich Neuwirth > Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: Re: [Rd] question > > > Erich Neuwirth

Hi, We have outdated SOA information in our samba DNS. We used to have a DC1, and it is no more, however it's listed in our SOA records on both remaining DC's. I think this is not correct. I am under the impression that in order to get full failover support, all DC's need to have listed themselves as SOA. This is also what google tells me:

On 22/03/2023 01:04, Anantha Raghava via samba wrote: > Hi, > > While upgrading Samba-AD fromm 4.15.9 to version 4.18, I ran into a > peculiar problem. AD Component is up, but DNS is just not coming up. > kinit is reporting KDC not found problem. > > All these years I have been compiling samba from source and for nearly 7 > years, it was working like a charm. But this

Hi, I seem to have a split brain issue, but I cannot figure out where this is and what it is, can someone help me pls, I cant find what to fix here. ========== root at salt-001:~# salt gluster* cmd.run 'df -h' glusterp2.graywitch.co.nz: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/centos-root

Hi, Which version of gluster you are using? You can find which file is that using the following command find <brickpath> -samefile <brickpath/.glusterfs/<first two bits of gfid>/<next 2 bits of gfid>/<full gfid> Please provide the getfatr output of the file which is in split brain. The steps to recover from split-brain can be found here,

Hello Rowland, ldbsearch command is returning 0 records. # returned 0 records # 0 entries # 0 referrals On the backup front, I take the back up using samba-tool backup command and it was successful. Can I create a new ForestZone using samba-tool? I asking this question as RSAT is not connecting to DNS server. Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava H A This e-mail communication and any

How do I find what "eafb8799-4e7a-4264-9213-26997c5a4693" is? https://docs.gluster.org/en/v3/Troubleshooting/gfid-to-path/ On May 21, 2018 3:22:01 PM PDT, Thing <thing.thing at gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >I seem to have a split brain issue, but I cannot figure out where this >is >and what it is, can someone help me pls, I cant find what to fix here. >

I tried this already. 8><--- [root at glusterp2 fb]# find /bricks/brick1/gv0 -samefile /bricks/brick1/gv0/.glusterfs/ea/fb/eafb8799-4e7a-4264-9213-26997c5a4693 /bricks/brick1/gv0/.glusterfs/ea/fb/eafb8799-4e7a-4264-9213-26997c5a4693 [root at glusterp2 fb]# 8><--- gluster 4 Centos 7.4 8><--- df -h [root at glusterp2 fb]# df -h Filesystem

Hello, We have a very fresh gluster 3.10.10 installation. Our volume is created as distributed volume, 9 bricks 96TB in total (87TB after 10% of gluster disk space reservation) For some reasons I can?t ?heal? the volume: # gluster volume heal gv0 Launching heal operation to perform index self heal on volume gv0 has been unsuccessful on bricks that are down. Please check if all brick processes

Hi Anatoliy, The heal command is basically used to heal any mismatching contents between replica copies of the files. For the command "gluster volume heal <volname>" to succeed, you should have the self-heal-daemon running, which is true only if your volume is of type replicate/disperse. In your case you have a plain distribute volume where you do not store the replica of any

I tried looking for a file of the same size and the gfid doesnt show up, 8><--- [root at glusterp2 fb]# pwd /bricks/brick1/gv0/.glusterfs/ea/fb [root at glusterp2 fb]# ls -al total 3130892 drwx------. 2 root root 64 May 22 13:01 . drwx------. 4 root root 24 May 8 14:27 .. -rw-------. 1 root root 3294887936 May 4 11:07 eafb8799-4e7a-4264-9213-26997c5a4693 -rw-r--r--. 1 root