similar to: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>: > > Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected to the 3 > bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that. > If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using `gluster volume start > engine force`, then launch the heal command like you did earlier and see if > heals

On 07/20/2017 02:20 PM, yayo (j) wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: > > 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>: > > 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run > the command? Does it complain anything about these files? > > >

On 07/19/2017 08:02 PM, Sahina Bose wrote: > [Adding gluster-users] > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:52 PM, yayo (j) <jaganz at gmail.com > <mailto:jaganz at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > We have an ovirt cluster hyperconverged with hosted engine on 3 > full replicated node . This cluster have 2 gluster volume: > > - data: volume for

Hi, Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>: 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run the > command? Does it complain anything about these files? > No, glustershd.log is clean, no extra log after command on all 3 nodes > 2. Are these 12 files also present in the 3rd data brick?

On 07/20/2017 03:42 PM, yayo (j) wrote: > > 2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>: > > > Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected > to the 3 bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that. > If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using

Hi all. If I have AD domain dc.samges.ru, how to setup a hostname, hosts file and resolv.conf file? DNS is samba internal type. Now I have settigs as here: (ad41 is dc with fsmo roles, ip 172.16.214.141, ad51 is a second dc, ip 172.16.214.151) root at ad51:~# hostname -s ad51 root at ad51:~# hostname -d samges.ru root at ad51:~# hostname -f ad51.samges.ru Must I have an $SERV.$ADDOMAIN

Tom In Shorewall6 4.4.27 the following proxyndp entry: 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3 eth2 eth0 no no does not add the required route. The code produced in /var/lib/shorewall6/.restart is: qt $IP -6 route del 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2 run_ip route add 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2 Splitting the line into 2 separate lines: qt $IP -6 route del 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2

18.11.2016 15:22, Rowland Penny via samba пишет: >> root at ad51:~# hostname -f >> ad51.samges.ru >> Must I have an $SERV.$ADDOMAIN hostname, like ad51.dc.samges.ru ? > Yes > >> If I change hostname now, what will happen in AD domain ? > > Your machine will not be found. But it can be found via DNS, why changing local (for this server) hostname affects this?

Hai Mike, I post it to the list so everybody can learn from it. > Why you use "hostname -i" ? man hostname wil tell.. But i'll try to explain it a bit. Read the Description, its also about how the hostnames are resolved within the systemfuntions. Like gethostname and gethostbyname > root at ad51:~# hostname -i > 127.0.0.1 > root at ad51:~# hostname -I >

Hi all! I operate an AD domain on samba4, provisioned some years ago. At provision some dns zones created, linked to my domain. I name domain as subdomain of my internet domain: AD dc.samges.ru, internet zone samges.ru Forward zones: dc.samges.ru _msdcs.dc.samges.ru All worked normal, but then my coworker create forward zone samges.ru (using windows RSAT tools) It serves some names, I can

See inline comments: On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:49:28 +0400 Mike Lykov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all. > > If I have AD domain dc.samges.ru, how to setup a hostname, hosts file > and resolv.conf file? DNS is samba internal type. > > Now I have settigs as here: > (ad41 is dc with fsmo roles, ip 172.16.214.141, ad51 is a second dc, > ip

Hai, Since your getting. finddcs: No matching server found > ERROR: Invalid IP address '3(NXDOMAIN)'! There is something wrong in the base of you setup. Check all DC's for ipnumbers (A) and PTR records. Dont forget to create the reverse zone yourself. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Troubleshooting

21.11.2016 12:32, L.P.H. van Belle via samba пишет: > Hai, > > Since your getting. > finddcs: No matching server found >> ERROR: Invalid IP address '3(NXDOMAIN)'! > There is something wrong in the base of you setup. yes, and it is a server own local hostname see "DC server own hostname must be part of ad dc domain?" thread your script relies on

On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:20:07 +0400 Mike Lykov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all! > > I operate an AD domain on samba4, provisioned some years ago. At > provision some dns zones created, linked to my domain. > > I name domain as subdomain of my internet domain: > AD dc.samges.ru, internet zone samges.ru > > Forward zones: > dc.samges.ru

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:58:03 +0100 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai Mike, > > I post it to the list so everybody can learn from it. > > > Why you use "hostname -i" ? > man hostname wil tell.. But i'll try to explain it a bit. > Read the Description, its also about how the hostnames are resolved >

See the following. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6761 Read 6.3 And https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1537 Snap: Note that all domains that contain hosts should have a "localhost" A record in them. Thats what i follow as close as possible. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny

Our software utilizes an OS X Server (Snow Leopard 10.6.8) for file read and writes. We gather files out of many directories, process them, and then write files back to the server. We had a long time end user who utilizes our software with an XP box upgrade from XP to Windows 7. Now with Windows 7 the SMBD is crashing routinely under heavy loads. Whatever information it was working

On 12/8/2017 2:54 PM, Taylor Hammerling via samba wrote: > Glad you guys replied, here is my output :D > > root at dc1:~# ./samba-setup-checkup.sh > Check hostnames : Ok > ./samba-setup-checkup.sh: line 89: [: too many arguments > Checking detected host ipnumbers from resolv.conf and default gateway > Ping gateway ip : 172.28.0.1 : Ok > ping nameserver1: 172.28.255.49 : Ok

Hi, we use attachment dedup with lots of emails (still migrating to it from maildir). We use netapp storage with wafl filesystem over nfs. Problem is that netapp has hard limit of 100k hardlinks to one file. And we encountered it. Problem is that dovecot start do segfault (lmtp,dsync,pop3 etc) when it happend when tried to deliver new emails with that attachment. Here is strace of dsync: 6740

On 3/5/2017 10:41 ??, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: > Does the UUID of root filesystem in /etc/fstab match the actual UUID > as reported by blkid? And remove/etc/lvm/cache/.cache if it exists Thank you Marcelo for replying, The directory /etc/lvm/cache/ is empty. And, yes, the UUID matches: # blkid /dev/vda1: UUID="297e2939-d6f5-431a-9813-9848368ee306" TYPE="xfs"