similar to: trying to mount gluster volume

Hi, I've created a 2 node glusterFS test (Gluster 3.8). Without enabling NFS-Ganesha, when I try to mount from a client using glusterfs option - everything works. However, after enabling NFS-Ganesha, when I try to mount from a client using the glusterfs option (fuse), it fails with the following output (when using the log-file option): [2017-12-28 08:15:30.109110] I [MSGID: 100030]

HI, I'm using CentOS 7.4 with Gluster 3.10.7 and Ganesha NFS 2.4.5. I'm trying to create a very simple 2 nodes cluster to be used with NFS-ganesha. I've created the bricks and the volume. Here's the output: # gluster volume info Volume Name: cluster-demo Type: Replicate Volume ID: 9c835a8e-c0ec-494c-a73b-cca9d77871c5 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2

Hi Jiffin, I looked at the document, and there are 2 things: 1. In Gluster 3.8 it seems you don't need to do that at all, it creates this automatically, so why not in 3.10? 2. The step by step guide, in the last item, doesn't say where exactly do I need to create the nfs-ganesha directory. The copy/paste seems irrelevant as enabling nfs-ganesha creates automatically the ganesha.conf and

On Saturday 02 December 2017 07:00 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > HI, > > I'm using CentOS 7.4 with Gluster 3.10.7 and Ganesha NFS 2.4.5. > > I'm trying to create a very simple 2 nodes cluster to be used with > NFS-ganesha. I've created the bricks and the volume. Here's the output: > > # gluster volume info > > Volume Name: cluster-demo > Type:

Hi, On Monday 04 December 2017 07:43 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > Hi Jiffin, > > I looked at the document, and there are 2 things: > > 1. In Gluster 3.8 it seems you don't need to do that at all, it > creates this automatically, so why not in 3.10? Kindly please refer the mail[1] and release note [2] for glusterfs-3.9 Regards, Jiffin [1]

Thanks Jiffin, Btw, the nfs-ganesha part in the release notes is having a wrong header, so it's not highlighted. One thing that it is still mystery to me: gluster 3.8.x does all what the release notes of 3.9 says - automatically. Any chance that someone could port it to 3.9? Thanks for the links On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan at redhat.com> wrote: >